Abstract
The modified airlift reactor (MALR) was previously developed to enhance the oxygen transfer coefficient, KLa by optimizing internal configurations and operational conditions. Although MALR mass transfer and gas–liquid hydrodynamic performance have been investigated, scaling has not yet been examined. Therefore, this work studies scale effects and defined scaling criteria to construct empirical correlations for multi-scale MALRs. Five different MALR working volumes or scales were examined (2.2, 4.4, 6.6, 17.5, and 140 dm3) in similar geometries. The results of scale effect on KLa and hydrodynamics showed that every MALR scale provided better KLa compared with regular reactors. Moreover, 1.1- to 1.6-fold higher KLa was obtained from the 140 dm3 reactor compared with 17.5 dm3. Scaling criteria analysis was divided into three types: multi-dimensional, liquid height, and combined processes. The KLa coefficient was defined as the scaling criteria compared to investigated parameters, i.e., oxygen transfer rate and efficiency, and aeration efficiency, for all three scaling types. Thus, KLa prediction correlations were constructed with respect to reactor configuration and operating conditions. KLa was well presented by all considered models, with R2 = 92–99% and discrepancy = 10–20%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akita K, Yoshida F (1973) Gas holdup and volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. Effects of liquid properties. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 12:76–80
Al Ba’ba’a HB, Amano RS (2017) A study of optimum aeration efficiency of a lab-scale air-diffused system. Water Environ J 31:432–439
American Society of Civil Engineers (1993) Measurement of oxygen transfer in clean water. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia
Ashley K, Fattah K, Mavinic D, Kosari S (2013) Analysis of design factors influencing the oxygen transfer of a pilot-scale Speece cone hypolimnetic aerator. J Environ Eng 140:04013011
Barreto CM, Ochoa IM, Garcia HA, Hooijmans CM, Livingston D, Herrera A, Brdjanovic D (2018) Sidestream superoxygenation for wastewater treatment: oxygen transfer in clean water and mixed liquor. J Environ Manage 219:125–137
Beinhauer R (1971) Dynamic measurement of the relative gas contents in bubble columns by means of X-ray absorption. Dissertation, Technical University of Berlin
Benyahia F, Jones L (1997) Scale effects on hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics of external loop airlift reactors. J Chem Technol Biotechnol Int Res Process Environ Clean Technol 69:301–308
Besagni G, Inzoli F, De Guido G, Pellegrini LA (2016) Experimental investigation on the influence of ethanol on bubble column hydrodynamics. Chem Eng Res Des 112:1–15
Blažej M, Kiša M, Markoš J (2004) Scale influence on the hydrodynamics of an internal loop airlift reactor. Chem Eng Process 43:1519–1527
Bun S, Wongwailikhit K, Chawaloesphonsiya N, Lohwacharin J, Ham P, Painmanakul P (2019a) Development of modified airlift reactor (MALR) for improving oxygen transfer: optimize design and operation condition using ‘design of experiment’ methodology. Environ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1579869
Bun S, Chawaloesphonsiya N, Nakajima F, Tobino T, Painmanakul P (2019b) Comparative study of local gas-liquid hydrodynamics and mass transfer between conventional and modified airlift reactors. J Environ Chem Eng 10:103206
Cerri MO, Badino AC (2010) Oxygen transfer in three scales of concentric tube airlift bioreactors. Biochem Eng J 51:40–47
Christi MY (1989) Airlift bioreactors: experimental techniques of investigation into bioreactors. Elsevier Applied Science, London
Deckwer WD, Burckhart R, Zoll G (1974) Mixing and mass transfer in tall bubble columns. Chem Eng Sci 29:2177–2188
Fogler HS (2006) Elements of chemical reaction engineering. Pearson Education Inc, Fort Worth
Gavrilescu M, Tudose RZ (1997) Effects of geometry on hydrodynamics in external-loop airlift reactors. Chem Eng Commun 156:89–113
Giovannettone JP, Gulliver JS (2008) Gas transfer and liquid dispersion inside a deep airlift reactor. AIChE J 54:850–861
Han M, Laari A, Koiranen T (2017) Hydrodynamics and mass transfer performance of annulus-rising airlift reactor-the effect of reactor scale. Int J Chem Eng Appl 8:47
He Z, Petiraksakul A, Meesapya W (2003) Oxygen-transfer measurement in clean water. J KMITNB 13:14–19
Hongprasith N, Dolkittikul N, Apiboonsuwan K, Pungrasmi W, Painmanakul P (2016) Study of different flexible aeration tube diffusers: characterization and oxygen transfer performance. Environ Eng Res 21:233–240
Imai T, Zhu H (2011) Improvement of oxygen transfer efficiency in diffused aeration systems using liquid-film-forming apparatus. In: Mass transfer-advanced aspects. InTech, Rijeka
Jia X, Hu W, Yuan X, Yu K (2015) Effect of surfactant type on interfacial area and liquid mass transfer for CO2 absorption in a bubble column. Chin J Chem Eng 23:476–481
Kouzbour S, El Azher N, Gourich B, Gros F, Vial C, Stiriba Y (2017) Removal of manganese (II) from drinking water by aeration process using an airlift reactor. J Water Process Eng 16:233–239
Kracht W, Gomez C, Finch J (2008) Controlling bubble size using a frit and sleeve sparger. Miner Eng 21:660–663
Levenspiel O (1962) Chemical reaction engineering. Wiley, New York
Liu T, Miura S, Yaguchi M, Arimura T, Park EY, Okabe M (2006) Scale-up of l-lactic acid production by mutant strain Rhizopus sp. Mk-96-1196 from 0.003 m3 to 5 m3 in airlift bioreactors. J Biosci Bioeng 101:9–12
Lukić NL, Šijački IM, Kojić PS, Popović SS, Tekić MN, Petrović DL (2017) Enhanced mass transfer in a novel external-loop airlift reactor with self-agitated impellers. Biochem Eng J 118:53–63
Manikandan S, Karthikeyan N, Suganthi KS, Rajan KS (2012) Enhancement of volumetric mass transfer coefficient for oxygen transfer using Fe2O3-water nanofluids. Asian J Sci Res 5:271–277
McClure DD, Liu Z, Barton GW, Fletcher DF, Kavanagh JM (2018) Oxygen transfer in pilot-scale contactors: an experimental and computational investigation into the effect of contactor design. Chem Eng J 344:173–183
Oliveira MS, Ni XW (2004) Effect of hydrodynamics on mass transfer in a gas–liquid oscillatory baffled column. Chem Eng J 99:59–68
Sarin P, Snoeyink VL, Bebee J, Jim KK, Beckett MA, Kriven WM, Clement JA (2004) Iron release from corroded iron pipes in drinking water distribution systems: effect of dissolved oxygen. Water Res 38:1259–1269
Sastaravet P, Chuenchaem C, Thaphet N, Chawaloesphonsiya N, Painmanakul P (2014) Comparative study of mass transfer and bubble hydrodynamic parameters in bubble column reactor: physical configurations and operating conditions. Environ Eng Res 19:345–354
Van Baten JM, Ellenberger J, Krishna R (2003) Hydrodynamics of internal air-lift reactors: experiments versus CFD simulations. Chem Eng Process 42:733–742
Zhang X, Guo K, Qi W, Zhang T, Liu C (2017) Gas holdup, bubble behaviour, and mass transfer characteristics in a two-stage internal loop airlift reactor with different screens. Can J Chem Eng 95:1202–1212
Zheng Z, Chen Y, Zhan X, Gao M, Wang Z (2018) Mass transfer intensification in a novel airlift reactor assembly with helical sieve plates. Chem Eng J 342:61–70
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by ASEAN University Network/Southeast Asia Engineering Education Development Network (AUN/SEED-Net) Program of Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) through Collaborative Research (CR) Program JFY 2018. This work was also supported by Center of Excellence on Hazardous Substance Management (HSM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bun, S., Chawaloesphonsiya, N., Ham, P. et al. Experimental and empirical investigation of mass transfer enhancement in multi-scale modified airlift reactors. Multiscale and Multidiscip. Model. Exp. and Des. 3, 89–101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-019-00063-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-019-00063-0