Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Growth Impacts of Catastrophic and Non-catastrophic Natural Disasters

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Disasters and Climate Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using disaster data from 1960, this paper examines the effects of natural disasters on economic growth. The analysis considers disaster effects by combining the following four dimensions: 1) short-, medium-, and long-term impacts, 2) disaster severity, categorized as catastrophic (CAT) or non-catastrophic (NCAT), 3) disaster type: hydro-meteorological, geophysical, and other specific disaster types, and 4) four income groups. The results show that the impacts of a disaster event on economic growth vary depending on the time frame, severity, disaster type, and income level. Overall, CAT disasters have negative impacts regardless of the time frame, while NCAT disasters may have positive impacts depending on the disaster type. The results also indicate that economic growth in lower-middle-income countries is most sensitive to natural disasters, but developed countries also experience negative impacts from CAT disasters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There is a case of increased investment, beyond the initial balanced growth path before the disaster occurred, in the intermediate term after a disaster. However, in the long run, the GDP per capita may return to its initial balanced growth path for the following reasons: the depreciation of capital is larger than the replacement investments (Albala-Bertrand 1993) and the temporary inflow of foreign aid/assistance stops at a certain point in time (Klomp and Valckx 2014).

  2. See Cavallo and Noy 2011; Klomp and Valckx 2014; Kousky 2014; Lazzaroni and van Bergeijk 2014 for a comprehensive literature review.

  3. See Appendix Table 6 for specific income group thresholds in the analytical period from 1990 to 2010.

  4. Some studies use NatCatSERVICE, which is a private database provided by the insurance firm Munich Re, and adopt an alternative decision rule known as “an adaptation of Munich Re’s great natural catastrophe category” (e.g., Felbermayr and Gröschl 2014; Gassebner et al. 2010; Klomp 2016). These studies define a catastrophic disaster if a disaster event satisfies any of the following criteria: (i) number of killed is no fewer than 1000, (ii) number of injured is no fewer than 1000, (iii) number of affected is no fewer than 100,000, and (iv) the amount of the damages is larger than $1 billion.

  5. Recent papers used original data on hazard strength and hazard intensity (See Hsiang and Jina 2014; Felbermayr and Gröschl 2014; Newmayer et al., 2014).

  6. Fomby et al. (2013), Loayza et al. (2012), and Klomp (2016) constructed a disaster variable, which divides the sum of fatalities and 30% of the total number of people affected by the total population; the number of affected is counted by the definition of the IMF (2003).

  7. We consider the lagged year as more than 10 years and as the long-term effect, which is longer than lagged years used in previous studies (Cavallo et al. 2013; Cunado and Ferreira 2014; Klomp et al., 2016; McDermott et al. 2014).

  8. If interested in the results of other thresholds (95th, 90th, 75th) and the IMF (2003) decision rule, they are available upon request.

  9. With different definitions of a short-term period, particularly the shorter term (e.g. [t, t-1], [t, t-3]), the negative coefficients of disaster variables are smaller. Moreover, the negative coefficients of the medium-term period are larger.

References

  • Abe K, Ishimura G, Tsurumi T, Managi S, Sumaila UR (2017) Does trade openness reduce a domestic fisheries catch? Fish Sci 83(6):897–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akao K, Managi S (2007) The feasibility and optimality of sustainable growth under materials balance. J Econ Dyn Control 31(11):3778–3790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alauddin M, Sarker MAR (2014) Climate change and farm-level adaptation decisions and strategies in drought-prone and groundwater-depleted areas of Bangladesh: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 106:204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albala-Bertrand J (1993) Natural disaster situations and growth: a macroeconomic model for sudden disaster impacts. World Dev 21:1417–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68(1):29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Salai-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87(1):115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo E, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J (2013) Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1549–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo E, Noy I (2011) The economics of natural disasters: a survey. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 5:63–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhibber A, Laajaj R (2008) Natural disasters and economic development impact, response and preparedness. J Afr Econ 17:7–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman M, Noy I (2011) Hurricane Iniki: measuring the long-term economic impact of a natural disaster using synthetic control. Environ Dev Econ 17:187–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunado J, Ferreira S (2014) The macroeconomic impacts of natural disasters: the case of floods. Land Econ 90(1):149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Duraiappah A, Managi S, Barbier E, Collins R, Fraumeni B, Gundimeda H, Liu G, Mumford KJ (2015) How to measure sustainable Progress. Science 350(62623):748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felbermayr G, Gröschl J (2014) Naturally negative: the growth effects of natural disasters. J Dev Econ 111:92–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fomby T, Ikeda Y, Loayza N (2013) The growth aftermath of natural disasters. J Appl Econ 28:412–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassebner M, Keck A, Teh R (2010) Shaken, not stirred: the impact of disasters on international trade. Rev Int Econ 18(2):351–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Sapir D, Below R, Hoyois Ph (n.d.) EM-DAT: The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database – www.emdat.be – Université Catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium

  • Heger M, Julca A, Paddison O (2008) Analysing the impact of natural hazards in small economies: the Caribbean case. UNU/WIDER research paper. No. 25

  • Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2012) Penn world table version 7.1, Center for International Comparisons of production, income and prices at the University of Pennsylvania

  • Hsiang SM, Jina AS (2014) The causal effect of environmental catastrophe on long-run economic growth: evidence from 6,700 cyclones. NBER Working Paper Series. No. 20352

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2003) Fund assistance for countries facing exogenous shocks. Policy development and review department. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

  • Kanie N, Abe N, Iguchi M, Yang J, Kabiri N, Kitamura Y, Managi S, Miyazawa I, Olsen S, Tasaki T, Yamamoto T, Yoshida T, Hayakawa Y (2014) Integrating sustainable development goals (SDGs) into a Post-2015 development agendas. Sustainability 6(4):1761–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanie N, Managi S (2014) Stimulating 2015 climate Deal: governance of low carbon technology transfer. Environ Econ Policy Stud 16(2):111–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klomp J (2016) Economic development and natural disasters: a satellite data analysis. Glob Environ Chang 36:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klomp J, Valckx K (2014) Natural disasters and economic growth: a meta-analysis. Glob Environ Chang 26:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousky C (2014) Informing climate adaptation: a review of the economic costs of natural disasters. Energy Econ 46:576–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R (2008) Crop switching as a strategy for adapting to climate change. African J Agric Resour Econ 2:105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzaroni S, van Bergeijk PAG (2014) Natural disasters’ impact, factors of resilience and development: a meta-analysis of the macroeconomic literature. Ecol Econ 107:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loayza N, Olaberria E, Rigolini J, Christiaensen L (2012) Natural disasters and growth: going beyond the averages. World Dev 40:1317–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):346–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107:407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott T, Barry F, Tol R (2014) Disasters and development: natural disasters, credit constraints, and economic growth. Oxf Econ Pap 66:750–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy I (2009) The macroeconomic consequences of disasters. J Dev Econ 88(2):221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuma H, Shin K, Managi S (2017) Reduction of future disaster damages by learning from disaster experiences. Nat Hazards 87(3):1435–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raddatz CE (2009) The wrath of god: macroeconomic costs of natural disasters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. No. 5039. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1471137

  • Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J 9(1):86136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore M, Toya H (2002) Do natural disasters promote long-run growth? Econ Inq 40:664–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore M, Toya H (2013) Natural disaster impacts and fiscal decentralization. Land Econ 89(1):101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobl E (2012) The economic growth impact of natural disasters in developing countries: evidence from hurricane strikes in the central American and Caribbean regions. J Dev Econ 97:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömberg D (2007) Natural disasters, economic development, and humanitarian aid. J Econ Perspect 21(3):199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsurumi T, Managi S (2014) The effect of trade openness on deforestation: empirical analysis for 142 countries. Environ Econ Policy Stud 16(4):305–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2015) Making development sustainable: the future of disaster risk management, global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Switzerland, Geneva

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant from the Sompo Japan Environment Foundation, the Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellow (263600), and a Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (26000001) by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the grant supporters.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Onuma.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 6 Income Group Thresholds

Appendix 2

Table 7 List of Countries in the Samples

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onuma, H., Shin, K.J. & Managi, S. Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Growth Impacts of Catastrophic and Non-catastrophic Natural Disasters. EconDisCliCha 5, 53–70 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-020-00074-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-020-00074-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation