Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between two generalized process capability indices for Burr XII distribution using bootstrap confidence intervals

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process capability index is an effective indicator for gauging the capability of a process potential and performance. It is used to quantify the relation between the actual performance of the process and the preset specifications of the product. In this article, we utilize bootstrap re-sampling simulation method to construct bootstrap confidence intervals, namely, standard bootstrap, percentile bootstrap, Student’s t bootstrap (STB) and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap to study the difference between two generalized process capability indices \(C_{\text {pTk1}}\) and \(C_{\text {pTk2}}\) (\(\delta =C_{\text {pTk1}}-C_{\text {pTk2}}\)) and to select the better of the two processes or manufacturer’s (or supplier’s) through simulation when the underlying distribution is Burr XII distribution. The model parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood method. The proposed four bootstrap confidence intervals can be effectively employed to determine which one of the two processes or manufacturers (or suppliers) has a better process capability. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to compare the performances of the proposed bootstrap confidence intervals for \(\delta \) in terms of their estimated average widths, coverage probabilities and relative coverages. Simulation results showed that the estimated average width and relative coverages of the STB confidence interval perform better than their counterparts. Finally, real data are presented to illustrate the bootstrap confidence intervals of the difference between two process capability indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Hamid AH (2009) Constant-partially accelerated life tests for Burr XII distribution with progressive Type II censoring. Comput Stat Data Anal 53:2511–2523

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Mousa MAM, Jaheen ZF (2002) Statistical inference for the Burr model based on progressively censored data. Comput Math Appl 43(10–11):1441–1449

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boyles RA (1994) Process capability with asymmetric tolerances. Commun Stat Simul Comput 23(3):615–635

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burr IW (1942) Cumulative frequency functions. Ann Math Stat 13(2):215–232

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-modal inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A multivariate measure of process capability. Int J Model Simul 13:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JP, Tong LI (2003) Bootstrap confidence interval of the difference between two process capability indices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JP, Chen KS (2004) Comparison of two process capabilities by using indices Cpm: an application to a color STN display. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 21(1):90–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JP, Chen KL (2006) Supplier selection by testing the process incapability index. Int J Prod Res 44(3):589–600

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chou YM (1994) Selecting a better supplier by testing process capability indices. Qual Eng 6(3):427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis JE, Schnabel RB (1983) Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and non-linear equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S, Saha M, Maiti SS, Jun CH (2018) Bootstrap confidence intervals of generalized process capability index Cpyk for Lindley and power Lindley distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput 47(1):249–262

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S, Saha M (2018) Bootstrap confidence intervals of the difference between two generalized process capability indices for inverse Lindley distribution. Life Circle Reliab Saf Eng 7(2):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 27(7):1–26

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The Jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter BH (1989) The use and abuse of Cpk. Qual Progress 22(3):108–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (1992) The bootstrap and edgeworth expansion. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang TC, Taguchi G (1985) A tutorial on quality control and assurance—the Taguchi methods. In: ASA annual meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, p 188

  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Gr Stat 5:299–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM (1974) Juran’s quality control handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanichukattu JK, Luke JA (2013) Comparison between two process capability indices using generalized confidence intervals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2793–2798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis AW (1982) The Burr distribution as a general parametric family in survivorship and reliability theory applications, pp 3095–3095

  • Maiti SS, Saha M, Nanda AK (2010) On generalizing process capability indices. Qual Technol Quant Manag 7(3):279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar M, Nassr SG, Dey S (2017) Analysis of Burr Type-XII distribution under step stress partially accelerated life tests with Type-I and adaptive Type-II progressively hybrid censoring schemes. Ann Data Sci 4(2):227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearn WL, Chen KS (1995) Estimating process capability indices for non-normal pearsonian populations. Qual Reliab Eng Int 11:389–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24:216–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perakis M (2010) Estimation of differences between process capability indices Cpm or Cpmk for two processes. J Stat Comput Simul 80(3):315–334

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RN (1977) A guide to the Burr type XII distributions. Biometrika 64(1):129–134

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saha M, Kumar S, Maiti SS, Yadav AS (2018) Asymptotic and bootstrap confidence intervals of generalized process capability index \(C_ {py}\) for exponentially distributed quality characteristic. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 7(4):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha M, Kumar S, Maiti SS, Yadav AS, Dey S (2019a) Asymptotic and bootstrap confidence intervals for the process capability index cpy based on Lindley distributed quality characteristic. Am J Math Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2019.1580644

  • Saha M, Dey S, Maiti SS (2019b) Bootstrap confidence intervals of \(C_{pTk}\) for two parameter logistic exponential distribution with applications. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1–9

  • Soliman AA (2005) Estimation of parameters of life from progressively censored data using Burr-XII model. IEEE Trans Reliab 54(1):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadikamalla PR (1980) A look at the Burr and related distributions. Int Stat Rev 48:337–344

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tosasukul J, Budsaba K, Volodin A (2009) Dependent bootstrap confidence intervals for a population mean. Thailand Stat 7(1):43–51

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tong LI, Chen HT, Tai YF (2008) Constructing BCa bootstrap confidence interval for the difference between two non-normal process capability indices CNpmk. Qual Eng 20(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CW, Shu MH, Pearn WL, Liu KH (2008) Bootstrap approach for supplier selection based on production yield. Int J Prod Res 46(18):5211–5230

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer WJ, Keats JB, Wang FK (1998) The Burr XII distribution in reliability analysis. J Qual Technol 30:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick D (1995) A hybrid method for fitting distributions to data and its use in computing process capability indices. Qual Eng 7:601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor and anonymous Referees for careful reading and for comments which substantially improved our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Dey, S. & Saha, M. Comparison between two generalized process capability indices for Burr XII distribution using bootstrap confidence intervals. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 8, 347–355 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-019-00092-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-019-00092-1

Keywords

Navigation