Skip to main content
Log in

Cutting-Based Single Atomic Layer Removal Mechanism of Monocrystalline Copper: Atomic Sizing Effect

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Nanomanufacturing and Metrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of atomic and close-to-atomic scale (ACS) cutting mechanism, through an investigation of a typical diamond–copper cutting system using molecular dynamics modeling. The fundamentals in the ACS cutting process towards single atomic layer removal are emphatically analyzed. The results indicate that cutting-based single atomic layer removal could be enabled on a Cu(111) surface, achieving minimum chip thickness to single atomic layer. The material removal during ACS cutting is greatly influenced by atomic sizing effect, mainly depending on the ratio of cutting depth to atomic radius. When the ratio is larger than one threshold value, plastic material removal could be realized with chip formation, and it is dominated by shear stress-driven dislocation motion, which is different from shearing-driven chip formation in conventional cutting and the extrusion-dominated chip formation in nanocutting. This study also shows that only elastic deformation occurs on the workpiece surface during ACS cutting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang FZ (2016) Atomic and close-to-atomic scale manufacturing—a trend in manufacturing development. Front Mech Eng 11(4):325–327

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Fang FZ, Zhang N, Guo D, Ehmann K, Cheung B, Liu K, Yamamura K (2019) Towards atomic and close-to-atomic scale manufacturing. Int J Extreme Manuf 1:012001–012033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pierre M, Wacquez R, Jehl X, Sanquer M, Vinet M, Cueto O (2010) Single-donor ionization energies in a nanoscale CMOS channel. Nat Nanotechnol 5(2):133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao M, Yu Y, Yimo H, Yang X, Zhu H, Wang S, Wang Y, Muller DA, Zhang X (2016) Large-scale chemical assembly of atomically thin transistors and circuits. Nat Nanotechnol 11(11):954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koch M, Keizer JG, Pakkiam P, Keith D, House MG, Peretz E, Simmons MY (2019) Spin read-out in atomic qubits in an all-epitaxial three-dimensional transistor. Nat Nanotechnol 14(2):137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang FZ, Xu FF (2018) Recent advances in micro/nano-cutting: effect of tool edge and material properties. Nanomanuf Metrol 1:4–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Komanduri R, Von Turkovich BF (1981) New observations on the mechanism of chip formation when machining titanium alloys. Wear 69(2):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie JQ, Bayoumi AE, Zbib HM (1995) Analytical and experimental study of shear localization in chip formation in orthogonal machining. J Mater Eng Perform 4(1):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fang FZ, Wu H, Zhou W, Hu XT (2007) A study on mechanism of nano-cutting single crystal silicon. J Mater Process Technol 184(1–3):407–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang FZ, Wu H, Liu YC (2005) Modelling and experimental investigation on nanometric cutting of monocrystalline silicon. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(15):1681–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu F, Wang J, Fang FZ, Zhang X (2017) A study on the tool edge geometry effect on nano-cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5–8):2787–2797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan J, Zhao H, Kuriyagawa T (2009) Effects of tool edge radius on ductile machining of silicon: an investigation by FEM. Semicond Sci Technol 24(7):075018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu PZ, Fang FZ (2016) Study of the minimum depth of material removal in nanoscale mechanical machining of single crystalline copper. Comput Mater Sci 118:192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Murray SD (1986) Embedded-atom-method functions for the FCC metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B 33(12):7983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Girifalco LA, Victor GW (1959) Application of the Morse potential function to cubic metals. Phys Rev 114(3):687

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support received from the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (No. 15/RP/B3208) and ‘111’ project by the State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs and the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. B07014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengzhou Fang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, W., Fang, F. Cutting-Based Single Atomic Layer Removal Mechanism of Monocrystalline Copper: Atomic Sizing Effect. Nanomanuf Metrol 2, 241–252 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-019-00045-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-019-00045-3

Keywords

Navigation