Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Real time fault detection in railway tracks using Fast Fourier Transformation and Discrete Wavelet Transformation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Railway transportation system is a safety critical system, a small fault in a train, track or train operation control system may cause serious hazards. Therefore, each of them should be carefully investigated for safe running of the trains. Railway tracks are deployed over a long span in diverse geographical conditions hence more vulnerable to the faults. Therefore, real time automatic track monitoring system is needed to timely investigate the tracks with precision without hurdling the normal train traffic. The main goal of this paper is to compare the performance of two mathematical methods (Fast Fourier Transformation and Discrete Wavelet Transformation) widely used to detect faults on railway tracks. The accelerator sensors are deployed on the axle-box of service trains to measure the acceleration of the vibrations produced by the running train. Both methods are used to process the acceleration measurements to estimate the track faults specifically, cracks and corrugations. The effectiveness of both methods is compared to determine the best implementation in a real time scenario. In real time scenario, the data is processed, as soon as it is collected from the accelerator sensors while train is running, rather than using previously collected data of the track. It was observed from the simulation results that using Fast Fourier Transformation, 100% of corrugations and 90.53% of cracks were detected, while using Discrete Wavelet Transformation, 99.33% of corrugations and 99.85% of cracks were detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silla A, Kallberg V-P (2012) The development of railway safety in Finland. Accid Anal Prev 45:737–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2011.09.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farrington-Darby T, Pickup L, Wilson JR (2005) Safety culture in railway maintenance. Saf Sci 43:39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2004.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kyriakidis M, Hirsch R, Majumdar A (2012) Metro railway safety: an analysis of accident precursors. Saf Sci 50:1535–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2012.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barke D, Chiu WK (2005) Structural health monitoring in the railway industry: a review. Struct Health Monit 4:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921705049764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu X, Saat MR, Barkan CPL (2012) Analysis of causes of major train derailment and their effect on accident rates. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2289:154–163. https://doi.org/10.3141/2289-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ministry of Railways, Indian Railways Statistical Publications 2016–17: Statistics for Track and Bridges, 2017. http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/railwayboard/uploads/directorate/stat_econ/IRSP_2016-17/Year_Book_Eng/10.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2018

  7. Hodge VJ, O’Keefe S, Weeks M, Moulds A (2015) Wireless sensor networks for condition monitoring in the railway industry: a survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16:1088–1106. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2366512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yick J, Mukherjee B, Ghosal D (2008) Wireless sensor network survey. Comput Netw 52:2292–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMNET.2008.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salvador P, Naranjo V, Insa R, Teixeira P (2016) Axlebox accelerations: their acquisition and time-frequency characterisation for railway track monitoring purposes. Measurement 82:301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li C, Luo S, Cole C, Spiryagin M (2017) An overview: modern techniques for railway vehicle on-board health monitoring systems. Veh Syst Dyn 55:1045–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2017.1296963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mori H, Tsunashima H, Matsumoto A, Mizuma T, Naganuma Y (2010) Condition monitoring of railway track using in-service vehicle. J Mech Syst Transp Logist 3:154–165. https://doi.org/10.1299/jmtl.3.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Firlik B, Czechyra B, Chudzikiewicz A (2012) Condition monitoring system for light rail vehicle and track. Key Eng Mater 518:66–75. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.518.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei X, Liu H, Jia L (2012) Fault detection of urban rail vehicle suspension system based on acceleration measurements. In: IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, AIM, pp 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2012.6265989

  14. Tsunashima H, Matsumoto A, Mizuma T, Mori H, Naganuma Y (2012) Condition monitoring of railway track using in-service vehicle. Reliab Saf Railw. https://doi.org/10.1299/jmtl.3.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chellaswamy C, Balaji L, Vanathi A, Saravanan L (2017) IoT based rail track health monitoring and information system. In: 2017 International conference on Microelectronic devices, circuits and systems, ICMDCS 2017, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMDCS.2017.8211548

  16. OBrien EJ, Quirke P, Bowe C, Cantero D (2018) Determination of railway track longitudinal profile using measured inertial response of an in-service railway vehicle. Struct Health Monit 17:1425–1440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717744479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chudzikiewicz A, Bogacz R, Kostrzewski M, Konowrocki R (2017) Condition monitoring of railway track systems by using acceleration signals on wheelset axle-boxes. Transport 33:555–566. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2017.1342101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rong J, Song S, Dang Z, Shi H, Cao Y (2016) Rail track irregularity detection method based on computer vision and gesture analysis. Int J Online Eng 12:55–59. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v12i12.6444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. James A, Jie W, Xulei Y, Chenghao Y, Ngan NB, Yuxin L, Yi S, Chandrasekhar V, Zeng Z (2018) TrackNet—a deep learning based fault detection for railway track inspection. In: 2018 International conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation, IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRT.2018.8641608

  20. Rizvi AR, Khan PR, Ahmad S (2017) Crack detection in railway track using image processing. Int J Adv Res 3:489–496

    Google Scholar 

  21. Papaelias MP, Roberts C, Davis CL (2008) A review on non-destructive evaluation of rails: state-of-the-art and future development. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 222:367–384. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pohl R, Erhard A, Montag H-J, Thomas H-M, Wüstenberg H (2004) NDT techniques for railroad wheel and gauge corner inspection. NDT E Int 37:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NDTEINT.2003.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Somalraju S, Murali V, Saha G, Vaidehi V (2012) Robust railway crack detection scheme (RRCDS) using LED-LDR assembly. In: 2012 International conference on recent trends on information and technology, IEEE, pp 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRTIT.2012.6206824

  24. Verma A, Pattanaik KK, Goel PP (2014) Mobile agent based CBTC system with moving block signalling for Indian Railways. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance, Ajaccio, Corsica, paper, vol 278, pp 8–11

  25. Verma A, Pattanaik KK (2015) Multi-agent communication based train control system for Indian Railways: the structural design. J Softw 10(3):250–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verma A, Pattanaik KK (2014) Mobile agent based train control system for mitigating meet conflict at turnout. Proc Comput Sci 32:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verma A, Pattanaik KK (2015) Multi-agent communication-based train control system for Indian railways: the behavioural analysis. J Mod Transp 23(4):272–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Verma A, Pattanaik KK (2016) Failure detector of perfect P class for synchronous hierarchical distributed systems. Int J Distrib Syst Technol 7(2):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Verma A, Singh M, Pattanaik KK (2019) Failure detectors of strong S and perfect P classes for time synchronous hierarchical distributed systems. Applying integration techniques and methods in distributed systems and technologies. IGI Global, pp 246–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Papaelias MP, Lugg MC, Roberts C, Davis CL (2009) High-speed inspection of rails using ACFM techniques. NDT E Int 42(4):328–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barshinger JN, Dewangan SK, Ramaswamy S, Li J (2007) US Patent No. 7,305,885. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office

  32. Clark R (2004) Rail flaw detection: overview and needs for future developments. NDT E Int 37(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pagano DA (1979) US Patent No. 4,174,636. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office

  34. Dhande BS, Pacharaney US (2017) Unmanned level crossing controller and rail track broken detection system using IR sensors and Internet of Things technology. In: 2017 International conference on inventive communication and computational technologies (ICICCT), IEEE, pp 206–210

  35. Dhande BS, Pacharaney US (2017) Railway management system using IR sensors and internet of things technology. Int J Sci Res Netw Secur Commun 5(1):12–15

    Google Scholar 

  36. Holguin GA, Lehman BL, Hull LA, Jones VP, Park J (2010) Electronic traps for automated monitoring of insect populations. IFAC Proc Vol 43(26):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zaman HU, Bhuiyan MMH, Ahmed M, Aziz ST (2016) A novel design of line following robot with multifarious function ability. In: 2016 International conference on microelectronics, computing and communications (MicroCom), IEEE, pp 1–5

  38. Li CJ, Limmer JD (2000) Model-based condition index for tracking gear wear and fatigue damage. Wear 241(1):26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zumpano G, Meo M (2006) A new damage detection technique based on wave propagation for rails. Int J Solids Struct 43(5):1023–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lepik Ü, Hein H (2014) Haar wavelets: with applications. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Li J, Shi H (2019) Rail corrugation detection of high-speed railway using wheel dynamic responses. Shock Vib 219:12

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gómez MJ, Corral E, Castejon C, García-Prada JC (2018) Effective crack detection in railway axles using vibration signals and WPT energy. Sensors 18(5):1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work is part of the research work funded by “Seed Grant to Faculty Members under IoE Scheme (under Dev. Scheme No. 6031 at Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India)” (Awarded to Anshul Verma) and “DST-Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India (File no. PDF/2020/001646)” (Awarded to Pradeepika Verma).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

    Chayan Ghosh & Anshul Verma

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India

    Pradeepika Verma

Authors
  1. Chayan Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anshul Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pradeepika Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anshul Verma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, C., Verma, A. & Verma, P. Real time fault detection in railway tracks using Fast Fourier Transformation and Discrete Wavelet Transformation. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 14, 31–40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00784-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00784-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation