Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Initial Evaluation of the Discomfort Sensitivity Scale

  • Published:
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Discomfort Sensitivity Scale (DSS) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in independent symptomatic (i.e., clinically elevated levels of depressive symptoms) and non-symptomatic subsamples. Participants were 846 undergraduate students (Mage = 19.28, SD = 2.52; 70.0% female; 85.6% Caucasian) that were split into non-symptomatic EFA (n = 286), non-symptomatic CFA (n = 286), and symptomatic CFA (n = 274) subsamples. The EFAs resulted in a 1-factor solution with 8 items. Subsequent CFAs in the symptomatic and non-symptomatic subsamples also supported a one-factor solution. The DSS demonstrated excellent internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity in its associations with other measures of psychopathology. The DSS appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of sensitivity to physical discomfort that is appropriate for use in clinical and non-clinical samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As the goal of the current study was to revise the DIS, we had intended to name the measure the Discomfort Intolerance Scale—Revised. However, the final measure did not contain any of the original DIS items, and the items that were retained appear to assess sensitivity to or dislike of physical discomfort rather than intolerance of physical discomfort. As such, we did not feel using DIS in the name would be appropriate and chose to name the measure the Discomfort Sensitivity Scale.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ACM, ALJ, CML, and EMO developed the measure and designed the study; EMO collected the data; ALJ, CML, and EMO analyzed the data and drafted the “Methods” and “Results” sections. ACM wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and ALJ, CML, and EMO provided significant input in revising the manuscript drafts. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison C. McLeish.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table

Table 7 Discomfort Sensitivity Scale (DSS). Instructions: Below are statements about how some people feel and behave. For each statement below, circle the number which best describes the degree to which the statement applies to you

7

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLeish, A.C., Johnson, A.L., Luberto, C.M. et al. Development and Initial Evaluation of the Discomfort Sensitivity Scale. J Cogn Ther 15, 434–451 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-022-00146-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-022-00146-w

Keywords

Navigation