Skip to main content
Log in

Proposition of a Shortened Version of the Self-efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA-15): Psychometric Validation and Cut-Off Score for CPAP Adherence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Vigilance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) is a 26-item questionnaire that investigates perceived risks, outcome expectancies and self-efficacy, i.e., the confidence to undertake treatment, in the context of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) interventions for sleep apnea syndrome. This questionnaire can be considered too lengthy for clinical practice; therefore, a shortened version is needed.

Methods

290 adults undergoing CPAP treatment completed the SEMSA-26. An item reduction process took into account both the results of statistical analyses and the expertise of a steering committee. Construct validity, reliability and external validity were tested for a 15-item short version. Additionally, CPAP adherence (usage more than 4 h per night) was collected, and receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to establish the cut-off point of the SEMSA-15 that would best classify patients depending on their adherence.

Results

The structure of the SEMSA-15 was confirmed by principal components factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.66 to 0.86. The SEMSA-15 dimension scores were highly correlated with their respective SEMSA-26 dimension scores. The self-efficacy sub-score of the SEMSA-15 obtained the best classification performance, with a cut-off point of 2.78 to predict CPAP adherence.

Conclusion

The SEMSA-15 seems to be appropriate for use in clinical practice to investigate beliefs and perception of self-efficacy in CPAP interventions. It is, therefore, a useful tool to predict long-term adherence to treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lévy P, Kohler M, McNicholas WT, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2015;1:15015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malhotra A, White DP. Obstructive sleep apnoea. Lancet. 2002;360:237–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09464-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatia M, Singh Y. CPAP compliance in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Vigil. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41782-019-00070-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gay P, Weaver T, Loube D, Iber C. Evaluation of positive airway pressure treatment for sleep related breathing disorders in adults. Sleep. 2006;29:381–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/29.3.381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Engleman HM, Wild MR. Improving CPAP use by patients with the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS). Sleep Med Rev. 2003;7:81–99. https://doi.org/10.1053/smrv.2001.0197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Macmillan; 1997.

  7. Schwarzer R, Fuchs R. Self-efficacy and health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting health behaviour. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1996. p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Philip P, Bioulac S, Altena E, et al. Specific insomnia symptoms and self-efficacy explain CPAP compliance in a sample of OSAS patients. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0195343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Stepnowsky CJ, Marler MR, Ancoli-Israel S. Determinants of nasal CPAP compliance. Sleep Med. 2002;3:239–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9457(01)00162-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Micoulaud-Franchi J-A, Monteyrol P-J, Guichard K, et al. Déterminants psychologiques et adhérence au traitement par pression positive continue: des outils pratiques pour une médecine du sommeil intégrative. Médecine Sommeil. 2017;14:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msom.2017.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Micoulaud-Franchi J-A, Coste O, Bioulac S, et al. A French update on the Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) to assess continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use. Sleep Breath. 2019;23:217–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-018-1686-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weaver TE, Maislin G, Dinges DF, et al. Self-efficacy in sleep apnea: instrument development and patient perceptions of obstructive sleep apnea risk, treatment benefit, and volition to use continuous positive airway pressure. Sleep. 2003;26:727–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/26.6.727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ware JE. Improvements in short-form measures of health status: introduction to a series. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Déry V. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:317–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862008000400018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  16. van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. Handbook of modern item response theory. Berlin: Springer; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56:81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steffen M. Universalism, responsiveness, sustainability—regulating the French Health Care System. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:401–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1504547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shapiro GK, Shapiro CM. Factors that influence CPAP adherence: an overview. Sleep Breath. 2010;14:323–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-010-0391-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parish JM, Lyng PJ. Quality of life in bed partners of patients with obstructive sleep apnea or hypopnea after treatment with continuous positive airway pressure. Chest. 2003;124:942–7. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.3.942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucile Dupuy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and French Good Clinical Practices.

Informed consent

All subjects provided written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dupuy, L., Bioulac, S., Coste, O. et al. Proposition of a Shortened Version of the Self-efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA-15): Psychometric Validation and Cut-Off Score for CPAP Adherence. Sleep Vigilance 4, 17–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41782-020-00083-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41782-020-00083-8

Keywords

Navigation