Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical research study of quantification methods of mineralogical phases in cementitious materials

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cement or clinker phase quantification is considered as an important task for the control of the cement quality and its manufacturing conditions. Indeed, precise clinker phase quantification allows the prediction of cement properties and the identification of possible anomalies during its production process. However, the complexity of cement and clinker mineralogy makes this step very difficult. In this work, a study was carried out to quantify the mineralogical phases of four Portland cements and two clinkers using two different methods: The first is the traditional Bogue method and the second is X-ray diffraction coupled with Rietveld refinement. The comparison method results showed that the Rietveld method is the most precise and powerful tool for cement and clinker phase quantification since it takes into account the minor phases such as gypsum, anhydrite, and hemihydrate and differentiates between the polymorphism varieties of cement phases (M1 alite, M3 alite, β belite, and γ belite). However, it was shown that Bogue calculation remains a primary estimation method of only the major clinker phases (C3S, C2S, C3A, and C4AF). Only for calcite amount must be better estimated by thermogravimetric technique or calcimetry method than Rietveld method, since there is an overlapping of the peaks of calcite and alite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michaux, M., Nelson, E.B., Vidick, B.: 2 chemistry and characterization of Portland cement. Dev Pet Sci. 28, 2-1–2-17 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Megriche A: The Effect of Marl and Clay Compositions on the Portland Cement Quality; 2016

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, H.: Cement Chemistry. Academic Press, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chatterjee, A.K.: Chemistry and engineering of the clinkerization process—incremental advances and lack of breakthroughs. Cem Concr Res. 41(7), 624–641 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Schepper, M., De Buysser, K., Van Driessche, I., De Belie, N.: The regeneration of cement out of completely recyclable concrete: clinker production evaluation. Constr Build Mater. 38, 1001–1009 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aldridge, L.: Accuracy and precision of an X-ray diffraction method for analysing Portland cements. Cem Concr Res. 12(4), 437–446 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrari, L., Kaufmann, J., Winnefeld, F., Plank, J.: Reaction of clinker surfaces investigated with atomic force microscopy. Constr Build Mater. 35, 92–96 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Odler, I.: Hydration, setting and hardening of Portland cement. In: Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, vol. 4, pp. 241–297 (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bogue, R.H.: Calculation of the compounds in Portland cement. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed. 1(4), 192–197 (1929)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stutzman PE: Guide for X-ray powder diffraction analysis of Portland cement and clinker: US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Applied Economics, Building and Fire Research Laboratory; (1996)

  11. Rietveld, H.: A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 2(2), 65–71 (1969)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khelifi, S., Ayari, F., Tiss, H., Hassan Chehimi, D.B.: X-ray fluorescence analysis of Portland cement and clinker for major and trace elements: accuracy and precision. J Aust Ceram Soc. 53(2), 743–749 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Standard N: P 94-048 (2003) Sols: Reconnaissance et Essais–Détermination de la teneur en calcite–Méthode du calcimètre. In.: January, AFNOR

  14. Choudhary, H., Anupama, A., Kumar, R., Panzi, M., Matteppanavar, S., Sherikar, B.N., Sahoo, B.: Observation of phase transformations in cement during hydration. Constr Build Mater. 101, 122–129 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aranda, M.A., Ángeles, G., León-Reina, L.: Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of OPC clinkers, cements and hydration products. Rev Mineral Geochem. 74(1), 169–209 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishi, F., Takéuchi, Y., Maki, I.: Tricalcium silicate Ca3O [SiO4]: the monoclinic superstructure. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials. 172(1–4), 297–314 (1985)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mondal, P., Jeffery, J.: The crystal structure of tricalcium aluminate, Ca3Al2O6. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Crystallogr Cryst Chem. 31(3), 689–697 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Colville, A., Geller, S.: The crystal structure of brownmillerite, Ca2FeAlO5. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Crystallogr Cryst Chem. 27(12), 2311–2315 (1971)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Standard A: C150/C150M-15 (2015) Standard specification for Portland cement ASTM international, West Conshohocken, PA, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0150-15.In

  20. Wesselsky, A., Jensen, O.M.: Synthesis of pure Portland cement phases. Cem Concr Res. 39(11), 973–980 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maki, I., Goto, K.: Factors influencing the phase constitution of alite in Portland cement clinker. Cem Concr Res. 12(3), 301–308 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Courtial, M., De Noirfontaine, M.-N., Dunstetter, F., Gasecki, G., Signes-Frehel, M.: Polymorphism of tricalcium silicate in Portland cement: a fast visual identification of structure and superstructure. Powder Diffract. 18(1), 7–15 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunstetter, F., De Noirfontaine, M.-N., Courtial, M.: Polymorphism of tricalcium silicate, the major compound of Portland cement clinker: 1. Structural data: review and unified analysis. Cem Concr Res. 36(1), 39–53 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Boughanmi, S., Labidi, I., Megriche, A., El Maaoui, M., Nonat, A.: Natural fluorapatite as a raw material for Portland clinker. Cem Concr Res. 105, 72–80 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Staněk, T., Sulovský, P.: The influence of the alite polymorphism on the strength of the Portland cement. Cem Concr Res. 32(7), 1169–1175 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhanumathidas, N., Kalidas, N.: Dual role of gypsum: set retarder and strength accelerator. Indian Concr J. 78(3), 1–4 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lutterotti, L., Scardi, P., Maistrelli, P.: LSI—a computer program for simultaneous refinement of material structure and microstructure. J Appl Crystallogr. 25(3), 459–462 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Le Saoût, G., Kocaba, V., Scrivener, K.: Application of the Rietveld method to the analysis of anhydrous cement. Cem Concr Res. 41(2), 133–148 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goswami, G., Mohapatra, B., Panda, J.: Gypsum dehydration during comminution and its effect on cement properties. J Am Ceram Soc. 73(3), 721–723 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Strydom, C., Potgieter, J.: Dehydration behaviour of a natural gypsum and a phosphogypsum during milling. Thermochim Acta. 332(1), 89–96 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Murat, M.: Sulfates de calcium et matériaux dérivés. Rapport de synthèse sur les méthodes d'analyse (détermination de la composition chimique et minéralogique). Mater Struct. 15(1), 63–91 (1982)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramachandran, V.S., Paroli, R.M., Beaudoin, J.J., Delgado, A.H.: Handbook of Thermal Analysis of Construction Materials. William Andrew (2002)

  33. Odigure, J.: Kinetic modelling of cement raw mix containing iron particles and clinker microstructure. Cem Concr Res. 26(9), 1435–1442 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Odigure, J.O.: Grindability of cement clinker from raw mix containing metallic particles. Cem Concr Res. 29(3), 303–307 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. De Noirfontaine M-N: Etude structurale et cristallographie des composés du ciment anhydre. Ecole Polytechnique X; (2000)

  36. Jadhav, R., Debnath, N.: Computation of X-ray powder diffractograms of cement components and its application to phase analysis and hydration performance of OPC cement. Bull Mater Sci. 34(5), 1137–1150 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. De La Torre, Á.G., Bruque, S., Campo, J., Aranda, M.A.: The superstructure of C 3 S from synchrotron and neutron powder diffraction and its role in quantitative phase analyses. Cem Concr Res. 32(9), 1347–1356 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. EN N: 196-1, Méthodes d’essais des ciments-Partie 1: détermination des résistances mécaniques. French Standard (2006)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Applied Mineral Chemistry (UR11ES18), Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Campus Universitaire Farhat Hached, 2092, Tunis, Tunisia

    Islem Labidi, Sonia Boughanmi & Adel Megriche

  2. Laboratory Production, Cements of Bizerte, BP 53, Baie de Sebra, 7018, Bizerte, Tunisia

    Houcine Tiss

Authors
  1. Islem Labidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sonia Boughanmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Houcine Tiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adel Megriche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Islem Labidi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Throughout this paper, the following notation for the cement:

C = CaO; S = SiO2; A = Al2O3; F = Fe2O3; N = Na2O; K = K2O; \( \overline{S} \) = SO3; LOI = Loss in ignition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labidi, I., Boughanmi, S., Tiss, H. et al. Critical research study of quantification methods of mineralogical phases in cementitious materials. J Aust Ceram Soc 55, 1127–1137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-019-00327-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-019-00327-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation