Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fifty Years with the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Aims and scope

Abstract

The 1972 paper introducing the Cox proportional hazards regression model is one of the most widely cited statistical articles. In the present article, we give an account of the model, with a detailed description of its properties, and discuss the marked influence that the model has had on both statistical and medical research. We will also review points of criticism that have been raised against the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1:
Figure 2:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen PK, Borgan Ø (1985) Counting process models for life history data: a review (with discussion). Scand J Statist 12:97–158

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen PK, Borgan Ø, Gill RD, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen PK, Geskus RB, de Witte T, Putter H (2012) Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls. Int J Epidemiol 41:861–70

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen PK, Gill RD (1982) Cox’s regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Ann Statist 10:1100–1120

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen PK, Skovgaard LT (2006) Regression with linear predictors. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey KR (1983) The asymptotic joint distribution of regression and survival parameter estimates in the Cox regression model. Ann Statist 11:39–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. Begun JM, Hall WJ, Huang W-M, Wellner JA (1983) Information and asymptotic efficiency in parametric-nonparametric models. Ann Statist 11:432–452

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bickel PJ, Klaassen CA, Ritov Y, Wellner JA (1998) Efficient and adaptive inference in semiparametric models. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Breslow NE (1974) Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics 30:89–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Buckley JD, James IR (1979) Linear regression with censored data. Biometrika 66:429–436

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM (2006) Measurement error in nonlinear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clayton DG, Cuzick J (1985) Multivariate generalizations of the proportional hazards model (with discussion). J R Statist Soc A 148:82–117

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J Roy Statist Soc B 34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cox DR (1975) Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62:269–276

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duchateau L, Janssen P (2008) The frailty model. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Efron B (1977) The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. J Amer Statist Assoc 72:557–565

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fang EX, Ning Y, Liu H (2017) Testing and confidence intervals for high dimensional proportional hazards models. J R Statist Soc B 79:1415–1437

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Amer Statist Assoc 94:496–509

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gail MH, Wieand S, Piantadosi S (1984) Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika 71:431–444

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ghosh D, Lin DY (2002) Marginal regression models for recurrent and terminal events. Statistica Sinica 12:663–688

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gill RD (1992) Marginal partial likelihood. Scand J Statist 19:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goeman JJ (2010) L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. Biom J 52:70–84

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hao L, Kim J, Kwon S, Ha ID (2021) Deep learning-based survival analysis for high-dimensional survival data. Mathematics 9:1244

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hernan MA (2010) The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiology 21:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hernan MA, Robins JM (2020) Causal inference: what if. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobsen M (1984) Maximum likelihood estimation in the multiplicative intensity model: a survey. Internat Statist Rev 52:193–207

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johansen S (1983) An extension of Cox’s regression model. Internat Statist Rev 51:258–262

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1973) Marginal likelihoods based on Cox’s regression and life model. Biometrika 60:267–278

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data (2nd edn 2002). Wiley, New York

  30. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Amer Statist Assoc 53(457–481):562–563

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kim WJ, Sung JM, Sung D, Chae M, An SK, Namkoong K, Lee E, Chang H (2019) Cox proportional hazard regression versus a deep learning algorithm in the prediction of dementia: an analysis based on periodic health examination. JMIR Med Inform 7(3):e13139

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kvamme H, Borgan Ø, Scheel I (2019) Time-to-event prediction with neural networks and Cox regression. J Mach Learn Res 20:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leger S, Zwanenburg A, Pilz K, Lohau F, Linge A, Zöphel K, Kotzerke J, Schreiber A, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Sak A, S M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Mönnich D, Zips D, Krause M, Baumann M, Troost EGC, Löck S, Richter C (2017) A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-to-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling. Nat Sci Rep 7:13206

  34. Lin DY (2000) Proportional means regression for censored medical costs. Biometrics 56:775–778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin DY, Wei LJ, Yang I, Ying Z (2000) Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events. J R Statist Soc Ser B 62:711–730

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z (1993) Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika 80:557–572

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lombard M, Portmann B, Neuberger J, Williams R, Tygstrup N, Ranek L, Ring-Larsen H, Rodes J, Navasa M, Trepo C, Pape G, Schou G, Badsberg JH, Andersen PK (1993) Cyclosporin A treatment in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a long-term placebo controlled trial. Gastroenterol 104:519–526

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Martinussen T, Scheike TH, Skovgaard IM (2002) Efficient estimation of fixed and time-varying covariate effects in multiplicative intensity models. Scand J Statist 28:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  39. Martinussen T, Vansteelandt S, Andersen PK (2020) Subtleties in the interpretation of hazard contrasts. Lifetime Data Anal 26:833–855

    Google Scholar 

  40. Oakes D (1977) The asymptotic information in censored survival data. Biometrika 59:472–474

    Google Scholar 

  41. Prentice RL, Kalbfleisch JD, Peterson AV, Flournoy N, Farewell VT, Breslow N (1978) The analysis of failure time data in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 34:541–554

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schemper M (1992) Cox analysis of survival data with non-proportional hazard functions. J R Statist Soc Ser D (The Statistician) 41:455–465

    Google Scholar 

  43. Slud EV (1986) Inefficiency of inferences with the partial likelihood. Commun Statist Theory Methods 15:3333–3351

    Google Scholar 

  44. Slud EV (1992) Partial likelihood for continuous-time stochastic processes. Scand J Statist 19:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stensrud MJ, Hernan MA (2020) Why test for proportional hazards? JAMA 323:1401–1402

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tsiatis AA (1981) A large sample study of Cox’s regression model. Ann Statist 9:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tsiatis AA (2006) Semiparametric theory and missing data. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. van Houwelingen HC, Putter H (2012) Dynamic prediction in clinical survival analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  49. Witten DW, Tibshirani R (2010) Survival analysis with high-dimensional covariates. Statist Methods Med Res 19:29–51

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wong WH (1986) Theory of partial likelihood. Ann Statist 14:88–123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark

    Per Kragh Andersen

Authors
  1. Per Kragh Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Kragh Andersen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares to have no conflicts of interest,

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andersen, P.K. Fifty Years with the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model. J Indian Inst Sci 102, 1135–1144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-021-00283-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-021-00283-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation