Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges and Operational Strategies to Achieve Partial Nitrification in Biological Wastewater Treatment: A Review

  • Review article
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Partial nitritation is a promising technology for wastewater treatment systems and, in symbiosis with other nitrogen removal approaches (i.e., Anammox bacteria), is attractive for reducing costs compared to conventional technologies. However, the intrinsic problems related to the different characteristics of the effluent induce unstable process conditions, including the subsequent accumulation of nitrate, which also reduces the partial yield of nitritation. Several studies highlight the persistent obstacles in preventing nitrate accumulation by nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, identified as the main challenge in the partial nitritation process. Consequently, this study conducted a comprehensive literature review, exploring various strategies to overcome these bottlenecks. Addressing the suppression of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and the inhibition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria involved consideration of operational strategy. Notably, pH emerged as an essential factor affecting microbial activity and process stability, influencing the efficiency of biochemical reactions. In addition, other interferents, such as organic compounds and metals, can influence the health and activity of microorganisms, affecting the overall effectiveness of the nitrogen removal process. The systematic control of various environmental and operational variables is essential for the stability of the process, demonstrating that a single strategy does not define the control of partial nitritation in wastewater. To date, maintaining dissolved oxygen in the range of 0.4 to 1 mg O2 L−1 and temperatures between 25 and 35 °C remains the most viable strategy for promoting stable partial nitritation. Finally, it is imperative to carry out further studies to develop control strategies and technologies, guaranteeing the efficiency of large-scale nitrogen removal systems and maintaining environmental safety standards.

Article Highlights

  • Key advantages and limitations to favor AOB activity were critically discussed.

  • The partial nitrification dynamical energy efficiency was explored.

  • PN/A-based processes with different operational strategies require further study.

  • Control strategies using microbial mechanisms are potential and necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

(Adapted from Zhu et al. 2008)

Fig. 5

(Adapted from Anthonisen et al. 1976)

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

ADP:

Adenosine DiPhosphate

AOB:

Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria

ATP:

Adenosine TriPhosphate

CANON:

Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite

COD:

Chemical oxygen demand

DEMON:

Deammonification: PN + Anammox

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic Acid

DO:

Dissolved oxygen

Ea:

Activation energy

FA:

Free Ammonia

FNA:

Free Nitrous Acid

HRT:

Hydraulic Retention time

IFAS:

Fixed-biofilm activated sludge

MBBR:

Moving bed biofilm reactor.

NOB:

Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria

OLAND:

Oxygen limited autotrophic nitrification–denitrification

PN:

Partial nitritation

PN/A:

Partial nitritation /Anammox

RNA:

Ribonucleic Acid

SBR:

Sequential Batch Reactor

SHARON:

Single reactor for high activity ammonia removal over nitrite

SNAP:

Single stage nitrogen removal using Anammox and partial nitrification

SRT:

Solid Retention Time

TAN:

Total ammonia nitrogen

TN:

Total nitrogen

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank financial support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological (CNPq), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Araucaria Foundation for Support to Scientific and Technological Development of the State of Paraná (FA), and the University of Technology—Paraná—UTFPR-Dois Vizinhos.

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological (CNPq); Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and Araucaria Foundation for Support to Scientific and Technological Development of the State of Paraná (FA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Celant De Prá.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolsan, A.C., Hollas, C.E., Rodrigues, H.C. et al. Challenges and Operational Strategies to Achieve Partial Nitrification in Biological Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Int J Environ Res 18, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00572-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00572-y

Keywords

Navigation