Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainability spillover effects of social, environment and economy: mapping global sustainable development in a systematic analysis

  • Climate Change Impacts On Regional Economics In South Asia
  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Initially introduced in 2015, the United Nations (UN) has launched 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a unique platform to facilitate global sustainability, end poverty, address environmental concerns, and act as a blueprint for peace and prosperity. Nevertheless, the question remains unanswered whether globalization and openness, as a result of the UN platform, support global sustainability or are against it. To answer this question, our study estimated and compared the effects of each sustainable development pillar of social, environment and economy in global regions and their potential spillover effects on each other. To estimate the sustainability spillover effects (or sustainability elasticities), a SEY (Social-Environment-Economy) model was developed as a package of simultaneous equations, Vector Autoregressive (VAR) and Granger causality approaches from 1971 to 2016. According to the results, the sustainability in each region showed a positive spillover effect on sustainability in other regions. This confirmed synergies between global and local sustainable development as sustainability elasticities range from 1.27% in Asia to 3.96% in MENA (Middle East and North Africa). However, there is some evidence in North America, that indicate trends in de-internationalization and de-globalization. Still, based on the positively dominant role of global spillover effects, this study considered the addition of a 4th pillar of sustainability (or sustainable development) as Peace and Partnership (or spillover effects) that is inter-related with SDG 16 and SDG 17. In this way, a new perspective as “Integrated Sustainability” is introduced in addition to the common weak and strong sustainability. This perspective, in turn, encourages global flow-based governance and improves sustainability in a peaceful and integrated environment through regional unions, intergovernmental and international agreements and partnerships.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Elaborated by authors, based on (Cutter et al. 2015; Nodehi et al. 2021; Taghvaee et al. 2021a, b, c; UN 2020)

Fig. 2

Source: Elaborated by authors, based on (Cutter et al. 2015; Nodehi et al. 2021; Taghvaee et al. 2021a, b, c; UN 2020)

Fig. 3

Source: Researchers’ findings

Fig. 4

Source: Researchers’ findings. (In Fig. 4, the left-hand-side regions affect the right-hand-side ones with spillover effects. The positive spillover effects or synergies are coming from and going inside the rectangles, while the negative spillover effects or trade-offs emerge from and go outside the rectangles, assigned to each region of the world. As can be seen, most of the spillover effects are positive and represent synergistic relationships)

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data employed in this research is available in the following repository link (Taghvee et al. 2021).

Code availability

The work-file of EViews software and its codes employed in this research are available in the following repository link (Taghvee et al. 2021).

Notes

  1. SDG 16 and 17 are about peace and partnership, encouraging globalization and openness (Taghvaee et al. 2021).

  2. Spillover effects can be defined as the interaction of sustainable development between two or more regions that can potentially be considered as a proxy for globalization and openness. From this point of view, globalization and openness are beneficial for sustainable development if the spatial spillover effects are positive; in this case, the policy-makers should adopt flow-based governance and synergetic problem-solving, rather than place-based governance and trade-offs relationships.

  3. The normalization is according to the following equation:

    \({\text{Normalized value}} = \frac{{{\text{Current value}} - {\text{Maximum value}}}}{{{\text{Maximum value}} - {\text{Minimum value}}}}\)

    After normalization, all the variables are put into the stationary test, and all of them are stationary in level.

References

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taghvaee, V.M., Nodehi, M., Arani, A.A. et al. Sustainability spillover effects of social, environment and economy: mapping global sustainable development in a systematic analysis. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci 7, 329–353 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-022-00231-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-022-00231-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation