Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser for debonding of ceramic brackets and prevention of enamel damage and intrapulpal temperature change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Dental Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debonding of ceramic brackets can cause problems such as bracket fracture and enamel damage due to high bond strength and low fracture toughness. Laser irradiation, aiming to decrease the bond strength, may be able to enhance ceramic bracket debonding. Nonetheless, temperature rise following laser therapy can adversely affect the dental pulp. The aim of this study is to assess enamel damage and intrapulpal temperature change after debonding ceramic brackets with or without Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation. In this experimental study, 80 Fascination ceramic brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of extracted human premolars. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 40. In group 1 (control), polycrystalline brackets were debonded using the pliers recommended by the manufacturer. In group 2, brackets were irradiated by Er,Cr:YSGG (Waterlase iPlus, Biolase, USA, 12/2013), gold handpieces, and tip MZ8 and were operated at 50 Hz, 4.5 W, H-Mode (60 μs), 80% water, and 60% air. After laser irradiation, the brackets were debonded as in group 1. Before bracket bonding and after debonding, the buccal surface of the teeth was inspected under a stereomicroscope to assess the presence of enamel cracks. The number and length of enamel cracks before bonding and after debonding were compared using Scope Image version 9.0. A K-type thermocouple with 0.2-mm diameter was used to assess the intrapulpal temperature change following laser irradiation. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22. No enamel fracture was noted in the control or laser group. Bracket debonding with the help of laser decreased the number and length of enamel cracks compared with the control group. Temperature rise in the laser group (2.63 ± 1.3 °C) was significantly lower than the critical threshold of 5.5 °C. The two groups showed significant differences regarding the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores (P < 0.05). Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation can minimize enamel damage with no thermal damage to the pulp, and is an efficient and safe modality for enhanced debonding of ceramic brackets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahrari F, Heravi F, Fekrazad R, Farzanegan F, Nakhaei S (2012) Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets? Lasers Med Sci 27(3):567–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0933-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldon PJ, Murray PE, Burch JG, Meister M, Freedman MA (2010) Diode laser debonding of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138(4):458–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Artun J (1997) A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 19(2):219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishara SE, Ostby AW, Laffoon J, Warren JJ (2008) Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. Angle Orthod 78(6):1078–1083. https://doi.org/10.2319/112007-540.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sulimana SN, Trojanb TM, Tantbirojnc D, Versluisd A (2015) Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: a quantitative analysis in vitro. Angle Orthod 85:651–656. https://doi.org/10.2319/032414-224.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han X, Liu X, Bai D, Meng Y, Huang L (2008) Nd: YAG laser-aided ceramic brackets debonding: effects on shear bond strength and enamel surface. Applied surface science 255(2):613–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bishara SE (2000) Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117(5):595–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70212-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozcan M, Finnema K, Ybema A (2008) Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization. Eur J Orthod 30(2):176–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sernetz F, Kraut J (1991) Laboratory evaluations on thermal debonding of ceramic brackets. J Clin Dent 2:87–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bishara SE, Trulove TS (1990) Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brouns EM, Schopf PM, Kocjancic B (1993) Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets. An in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 15:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azzeh E, Feldon P (2003) Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 123(1):79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dostalova T, Jelinkova H, Remes M, Šulc J, Němec M (2016) the use of the er:yag laser for bracket debonding and its effect on enamel damage. Photomed Laser Surg 34(9):394–399. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwon YH, Kwon OW, Kim HI, Kim KH (2003) Nd:YAG laser ablation of enamel for orthodontic use: tensile bond strength and surface modification. Dent Mater J 22:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee BS, Hsieh TT, Lee YL, Lan WH, Hsu YJ, Wen PH, Lin CP (2003) Bond strengths of orthodontic bracket after acid etched, Er: YAG laser irradiated and combined treatment on enamel surface. Angle Orthod 73:565–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Basaran G, Ozer T, Berk N, Hamamci O (2007) Etching enamel for orthodontics with an erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium gallium- garnet laser system. Angle Orthod 77:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tocchio RM, Williams PT, Mayer FJ, Standing KG (1993) Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 103:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Niemz MH (2004) Laser–tissue interactions; fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 45–150

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morford CK, Buu NC, Rechmann BM, Finzen FC, SharmaAB RP (2011) Er:YAG laser debonding of porcelain veneers. Lasers Surg Med 43:965–974. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.21144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Iseri U, Ulkur F, Arun T (2012) Effects of different application durations of scanning laser method on debonding strength of laminate veneers. Lasers Med Sci 27:713–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0959-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rechmann P, Buu NC, Rechmann BM, Le CQ, Finzen FC, Featherstone JD (2014) Laser all-ceramic crown removal a laboratory proof of principle study phase 1 material characteristics. Lasers Surg Med 46:628–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang Y, Rabie ABM (2014) A review of laser applications in orthodontics. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 25:47–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Macri RT, de Lima FA, Bachmann L, Galo R, Romano FL, Borsatto MC, Matsumoto MA (2015) CO2 laser as auxiliary in the debonding of ceramic brackets. Lasers Med Sci 30(7):1835–1841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1688-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yassaei S, Soleimanian A, Nik ZE (2015) Effects of diode laser debonding of ceramic brackets on enamel surface and pulpal temperature. J Contemp Dent Pract 16(4):270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghazanfari R, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Alikhasi M (2016) Laser-aided ceramic bracket debonding: a comprehensive review. J lasers med Sci 7(1):2–11. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2016.02

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayakawa K (2005) Nd: YAG laser for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128(5):638–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nalbantgil D, Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Arun T (2011) Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change duringdebonding. Lasers Med Sci 26(6):735–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0796-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tehranchi A, Fekrazad R, Zafar M, Eslami B, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N (2011) Evaluation of the effects of CO2 laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method. Lasers Med Sci 26(5):563–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0820-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahrari F, Fekrazad R, Kalhori KA, Ramtin M (2013) Reconditioning of ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Lasers Med Sci 28(1):223–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1093-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ishida K, Endo T, Shinkai K, Katoh Y (2011) Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology 99(2):129–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-011-0012-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahrari F, Basafa M, Fekrazad R, Mokarram M, Akbari M (2012) The efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in reconditioning of metallic orthodontic brackets. Photomed Laser Surg 30(1):41–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2011.3088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Basaran G, Ozer T, Berk N, Hamamci O (2007) Etching enamel for orthodontics with an erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser system. Angle Orthod 77(1):117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Maajoun MK, Henar TE, Tost AE, Terren CA (2017) CO2 and Er,Cr:YSGG laser applications in debonding ceramic materials: an in vitro study. Open J Dent Oral Med 5(3):25–30. https://doi.org/10.13189/ojdom.2017.050301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alikhasi M, Monzavi A, Ebrahimi H, Pirmoradian M, Shamshiri A, Ghazanfari R (2019) Debonding time and dental pulp temperature with the Er, Cr: YSGG laser for debonding feldespathic and lithium disilicate veneers. Lasers Med Sci 10(3):211–214. https://doi.org/10.22037/jlms.v10i3.20542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoteit M, Nammour S, Zeinoun T (2020) Evaluation of enamel topography after debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by different Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG lasers settings. Dent J (Basel) 9:8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8010006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarp ASK, Gülsoy M (2011) Ceramic bracket debonding with ytterbium fiber laser. Lasers Med Sci 26(5):577–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0817-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wigdor H, Abt E, Ashrafi S, Walsh JT (1993) The effect of lasers on dental hard tissues. J Am Dent Assoc 124(2):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saito A, Namura Y, Isokawa K, Shimizu N (2015) CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules. Lasers Med Sci 30(2):869–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1482-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kitahara-Ceia FM, Mucha JN, dos Santos M (2008) Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134(4):548–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eliades T, Viazis AD, Lekka M (1993) Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104(1):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Strobl K, Bahns TL, Willham L, Bishara SE, Stwalley WC (1992) Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101(2):152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zach L, Cohen G (1965) Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 19:515–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Grzech-Leśniak K, Matys J, Żmuda-Stawowiak D, Mroczka K, Dominiak M, Brugnera Junior A, Gruber R, Romanos GE, Sculean A (2018) Er:YAG laser for metal and ceramic bracket debonding: an in vitro study on intrapulpal temperature, SEM, and EDS analysis. Photomed Laser Surg 36(11):595–600. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yilanci H, Yildirim ZB, Ramoglu SI (2017) Intrapulpal temperature increase during Er:YAG laser-aided bebonding of ceramic brackets. Photomed Laser Surg 35(4):217–222. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Diaci J, Gaspirc B (2012) Review comparison of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers used in dentistry. Journal of the Laser and Health Academy 1:1–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahereh Baherimoghadam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by Ethical Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran (1397.16310201972010).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naseri, N., Ghasemi, N., Baherimoghadam, T. et al. Efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser for debonding of ceramic brackets and prevention of enamel damage and intrapulpal temperature change. Laser Dent Sci 4, 157–163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-020-00101-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-020-00101-y

Keywords

Navigation