Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulant Use in High-Stress Occupational Environments: Countermeasure or Counterproductive?

  • Major Empirical Contribution
  • Published:
Occupational Health Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In high-risk, 24/7 occupations, stimulants can serve as a countermeasure to acute stressors. However, chronic stimulant use may negatively impact operational readiness and health. Using cross-sectional data from 15,880 U.S. Navy personnel, we assessed relationships between job stress, sleep quantity and disturbance, and daily caffeine and nicotine use on readiness and health in the operational environment. Under operationally-relevant conditions of mid-high stress and poor sleep, use of caffeinated beverages (coffee/soda/tea), energy drinks, caffeine supplements (gum/pill), combustible tobacco (cigarette/cigar/pipe), electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; e-cigarettes/vape), and smokeless nicotine (chew/snuff/patch/gum) associated with either no effects or significant decrements in functional performance capacity. Caffeinated beverages benefit physical and mental health under moderate job stress and low sleep quantity (< 5 h/day), but decrement under high stress; energy drinks and supplements were neutral or detrimental to health. Combustible tobacco benefits physical health under high sleep disturbance, but decrements mental health under low sleep quantity. ENDS use was neutral to physical health, with benefits in mental health under high sleep disturbance but decrements under low sleep quantity. Smokeless nicotine was neutral to health. Overall, under high operational stress conditions, caffeine associated with significant benefits to readiness and health in 4% of conditions vs. decrements in 68% of conditions; nicotine associated with benefits in 7% vs. decrements in 11% of conditions. These data indicate that in high-risk work environments, chronic stimulant use has limited benefits as a sustained countermeasure, and may be more counterproductive by compounding the detrimental effects of occupational stressors on operational readiness and health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly because they are the property of the U.S. Department of Defense.

Notes

  1. U.S. servicemembers can purchase nicotine products at military stores and consume them in designated areas at military facilities. Although tobacco product use is prohibited inside of Navy vessels, commanding officers may designate outside-facing exterior “weather decks” as tobacco use areas (Department of the Navy, 2021). The presence of smoked nicotine use in otherwise unauthorized locations (e.g., “stealth vaping”; Williams et al., 2022) is recognized but its prevalence is unknown.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the leadership and crews of the participating U.S. Navy ships for their dedication and contributions. We also thank Jillian Jarrett, John Allen, and the CNSF OSRI team for their skilled technical contributions.

Funding

This work was supported by internal funds from the U.S. Navy, Commander Naval Surface Forces.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: DWR, PGR, CAR. Methodology: PGR, DWR, CAR. Investigation: DWR, PGR. Data Curation: PGR, CAR. Formal Analysis: PGR, CAR. Visualization: PGR, CAR. Writing—Original Draft: PGR, CAR, DWR. Writing—Review & Editing: PGR, CAR, DWR. Funding Acquisition: DWR.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Roma.

Ethics declarations

Declarations

This work was prepared as part of our official duties. Title 17, U.S.C §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C §101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by an employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. Neither the authors nor their family members have a financial interest in any commercial product, service, or organization providing financial support for this research. The authors are solely responsible for the preparation, conduct, writing, and submission of the manuscript. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, Leidos Inc., Rice University, Pepperdine University, Uniformed Services University, nor the U.S. Government.

Ethics Approval

This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The ASCAS was approved by the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Institutional Review Board (project NMCP.2020.0051).

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 789 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roma, P.G., Russell, C.A. & Russell, D.W. Stimulant Use in High-Stress Occupational Environments: Countermeasure or Counterproductive?. Occup Health Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-024-00180-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-024-00180-4

Keywords

Navigation