Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple Team Memberships and Employee Well-Being: Exploring Polychronicity and Support as Moderators

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Occupational Health Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To better understand the implications of multiple team membership (MTM) for employee well-being, we explored: (1) how MTM relates to stress and engagement; (2) demands as an underlying mediator; and (3) polychronicity and instrumental support as moderators. Participants who were full-time employees completed an online survey regarding their experiences with MTM. Results showed MTM predicted greater stress through increased demands, but individuals higher on polychronicity were less likely to experience these negative consequences. Interestingly, demands related positively to engagement, suggesting those associated with MTM may be beneficial (e.g., perceived as challenges rather than hindrances). Contrary to expectations, instrumental support did not buffer MTM’s relationship with demands. These findings expand the literatures on teams and employee well-being, and provide practical insights for organizations utilizing MTM structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

All data available upon request to the corresponding author.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abbey, J. D., & Meloy, M. G. (2017). Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality. Journal of Operations Management, 53–56(1), 63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baethge, A., Rigotti, T., & Roe, R. A. (2015). Just more of the same, or different? An integrative theoretical framework for the study of cumulative interruptions at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 308–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, R. M., Boroş, S., Kenis, P., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2013). It’s only temporary: Time frame and the dynamics of creative project teams. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. (2018). Multiple teams, multiple roles, multiple consequences: Are polychronics the better multiteamers? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018, 12406

  • Bertolotti, F., Mattarelli, E., Vignoli, M., & Macrì, D. M. (2015). Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and team performance: The role of social networks and collaborative technology. Research Policy, 44(4), 911–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology; Bradford, 14(3/4), 205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad?. In C. E. Lance, & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends. Psychology Press

  • Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S., & Barua, M. (2011). Relation between human resource development climate and employee engagement: Results from India. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7(4), 664–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Smith, T. A., Kirkman, B. L., Zhang, P., Lemoine, G. J., & Farh, J. L. (2019). Multiple team membership and empowerment spillover effects: Can empowerment processes cross team boundaries? Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 321–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2010). Things to Do Today… : A Daily Diary Study on Task Completion at Work. Applied Psychology, 59(2), 273–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, E. R., Reeves, C. J., Stewart, G. L., & Astrove, S. L. (2019). To link or not to link? Multiple team membership and unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 341–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. N., & Haas, M. R. (2012). So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 316–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deelstra, J. T., Peeters, M. C., Schaufeli, W. B., Stroebe, W., Zijlstra, F. R., & van Doornen, L. P. (2003). Receiving instrumental support at work: when help is not welcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finuf, K. D. (2020). Linking multiple team membership and outcomes: A multilevel daily diary study (Order No. 28093389) [Doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global

  • Fisher, G., & Aguinis, H. (2017). Using theory elaboration to make theoretical advancements. Organizational Research Methods, 20(3), 438–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gällstedt, M. (2003). Working conditions in projects: Perceptions of stress and motivation among project team members and project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerich, J., & Weber, C. (2020). The ambivalent appraisal of job demands and the moderating role of job control and social support for burnout and job satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 148(1), 251–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, T. K. (2016). Organizing to avoid project overload: The use and risks of narrowing strategies in multi-project practice. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), 94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. A., Hurlbert, J. S., & Zimmer, C. (1991). Occupational stress, social support, and the buffer hypothesis. Work and Occupations, 18(2), 212–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P. M., & Cooper, C. L. (2002). Occupational stress: Toward a more integrated framework. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Volume 2: Organizational psychology (pp. 93–114). Sage Publications, Inc

  • Hecht, T. D., & Allen, N. J. (2005). Person-job fit on the dimension of polychronicity: Examining links with well-being and performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2003(1), F1–F6

  • Johnson, J. V., & Hall, E. M. (1988). Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. American Journal of Public Health, 78(10), 1336–1342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman-Scarborough, C., & Lindquist, J. D. (1999). Time management and polychronicity. Comparisons, contrasts, and insights for the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3–4), 288–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawada, T., & Otsuka, T. (2011). Relationship between job stress, occupational position and job satisfaction using a brief job stress questionnaire (BJSQ). Work, 40(4), 393–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B. J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1974). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company

  • LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, S. (2009). Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 168–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, S., & Schmidt, A. M. (2016). The effect of regulatory focus on attention residue and performance during interruptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 218–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., & Fairchild, A. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 16–20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. (2020). Multiple team membership: An integrative review. Small Group Research, 51(1), 48–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., & Harris, J. (2005). No task left behind?: Examining the nature of fragmented work. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’05, 321–330

  • Mathieu, M., Eschleman, K. J., & Cheng, D. (2019a). Meta-analytic and multiwave comparison of emotional support and instrumental support in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(3), 387–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Gallagher, P. T., Domingo, M. A., & Klock, E. A. (2019b). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola, J., & Disselhorst, R. (2019). Should we be “challenging” employees?: A critical review and meta-analysis of the challenge‐hindrance model of stress.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40

  • Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological Aspects of Workload. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, & de C. J. Wolff (Eds.), A Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology (2nd vol., pp. 5–33). Psychology Press

  • Mo, G. Y., & Wellman, B. (2016). The effects of multiple team membership on networking online and offline: Using multilevel multiple membership modeling. Information, Communication, & Society, 19, 1250–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockałło, Z., & Widerszal-Bazyl, M. (2021). Role of job and personal resources in the appraisal of job demands as challenges and hindrances. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0248148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M., Woolley, A., & O’Leary, M. (2007). Conditions enabling effective multiple team membership.Virtuality and Virtualization,215–228

  • National Center for O*NET Development (2021). O*NET OnLine. https://www.onetonline.org/

  • O’Leary, M. B., Mortensen, M., & Woolley, A. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning from individuals and teams. The Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachler, D., Kuonath, A., Specht, J., Kennecke, S., Agthe, M., & Frey, D. (2018). Workflow interruptions and employee work outcomes: The moderating role of polychronicity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 417–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. F., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1983). Organizational determinants of job stress. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(2), 160–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanakul, P., Pinto, J. K., & Pinto, M. B. (2016). Motivation to perform in a multiple-project environment: The impact of autonomy, support, goal clarity, and opportunities for learning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 39, 65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluut, H., Flestea, A. M., & Curşeu, P. L. (2014). Multiple team membership: A demand or resource for employees? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(4), 333–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Ellis, A. P., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 391–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. O. L. H., Gogus, I., C., & Yu, R. C. F. (2010). When does teamwork translate into improved team performance? A resource allocation perspective. Small Group Research, 41(2), 221–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [R]. https://cran.r-projects.org

  • Rapp, T. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2019). Team and individual influences on members’ identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 303–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Razinskas, S., & Hoegl, M. (2020). A multilevel review of stressor research in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 185–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. (2019). Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych

  • Robinson, J., Litman, L., & Rosenzweig, C. (2021). Who are the Mechanical Turk workers?. In L. Litman, & J. Robinson (Eds.), Conducting Online Research on Amazon Mechanical Turk and Beyond. Sage Publications

  • Rogers, L. (2019). Median Age Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/06/median-age-does-not-tell-the-whole-story.html

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018). The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead. American Psychologist, 73(4), 593–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 459–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person-and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E. J., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 842–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storozuk, A., Ashley, M., Delage, V., & Maloney, E. A. (2020). Got Bots? Practical Recommendations to Protect Online Survey Data from Bot Attacks. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(5), 472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Ellingson, J. E. (2013). The impact of coworker support on employee turnover in the hospitality industry. Group & Organization Management, 38(5), 630–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The jamovi project (2020). Jamovi (1.2) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org

  • Thomas, K. A., & Clifford, S. (2017). Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 184–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2005). Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(4), 100–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafton, J. G., & Monk, C. A. (2007). Task interruptions. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3(1), 111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Brake, H. J., Walter, F., Rink, F. A., Essens, P. J. M. D., & van der Vegt, G. S. (2018). The dynamic relationship between multiple team membership and individual job performance in knowledge-intensive work.Journal of Organizational Behavior,1–13

  • Van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The Job Demand-Control (-Support) Model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress, 13(2), 87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. L., Seibert, S. E., Goering, D., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2019). A tale of two sample sources: Do results from online panel data and conventional data converge? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 425–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zika-Viktorsson, A., Sundström, P., & Engwall, M. (2006). Project overload: An exploratory study of work and management in multi-project settings. International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, 11550, Hempstead, NY, United States

    Kayla D. Finuf, Aditi Rabindra Sachdev & Rebecca Grossman

Authors
  1. Kayla D. Finuf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aditi Rabindra Sachdev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca Grossman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kayla D. Finuf.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The present study was approved by the IRB and was granted ‘Exempt’ status.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was given to participants. Consent to participate was required to complete the survey.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finuf, K.D., Sachdev, A.R. & Grossman, R. Multiple Team Memberships and Employee Well-Being: Exploring Polychronicity and Support as Moderators. Occup Health Sci 6, 183–205 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-022-00109-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-022-00109-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation