Skip to main content
Log in

A Comment on “What Is Wrong with the West’s Economies?” by Edmund Phelps

  • Comment
  • Published:
Homo Oeconomicus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper confront the Phelps’ theses on a decay of what he calls a flourishing era of capitalism with the commentator’s own experience with approaches that countries in Central and Eastern Europe must have adopted in the early 1990s during the so called transition. Unlike Phelps, the commentator states that an attachment to the text-book economics can hardly prevent the innovativeness and creativity of architects of institutional change. Moreover, the commentator claims that not only the 19th century but also the above few years of the end of the last century enjoyed Phelpsian flourishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dušan Tříska.

Additional information

D. Tříska: Former deputy minister of finance of Czechoslovakia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tříska, D. A Comment on “What Is Wrong with the West’s Economies?” by Edmund Phelps. Homo Oecon 33, 33–36 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-016-0011-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-016-0011-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation