Abstract
Geothermal energy has drawn its attention as an alternative promising energy source in recent times. Geothermal power plants have been developed in different parts of the world based on the geological conditions and thermal potential of the geofields. In the present study, a single-flash geothermal power plant (SFGPP) is proposed for possible operation in the Puga valley in Ladakh region, India. The SFGPP is evaluated thermodynamically using the method of energy and exergy analysis. A mathematical model of the proposed SFGPP is developed to obtain the rates of energy losses and exergy destruction of the SFGPP system components. The energy and exergetic efficiencies of individual components of the SFGPP system are then calculated. The results of the analyses showed that an output overall energy efficiency of 8.37% and the overall exergetic efficiency of 57.74%, respectively, can be obtained with a net power output of 3429.121 kW. The effects of expansion valve and the separator on the steam turbine (ST) power output and efficiency are found to be dependent on the geofluid conditions, especially on the geofield location. The overall performance of the single-flash system is expected to improve with a reduction in losses in the turbine, condenser, and the expansion valve.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data is available with the authors.
Abbreviations
- T :
-
Temperature, \(\left( {\text{K}} \right)\)
- \(x\) :
-
Dryness fraction, \(\left( \% \right)\)
- \(h\) :
-
Specific enthalpy, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}})\)
- \(h_{f}\) :
-
Specific enthalpy of saturated liquid, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}})\)
- \(h_{g}\) :
-
Specific enthalpy of saturated vapor, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}})\)
- \(h_{fg}\) :
-
Specific enthalpy of evaporation, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}})\)
- \(s\) :
-
Specific entropy, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}}{\text{.K}})\)
- \(s_{g}\) :
-
Specific entropy of saturated vapor, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}}{\text{.K}})\)
- \(s_{f}\) :
-
Specific entropy of saturated liquid, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}}{\text{.K}})\)
- \(s_{fg}\) :
-
Specific entropy of evaporation, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}}{\text{.K}})\)
- h 0 :
-
Specific enthalpy at the reference state, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}})\)
- \(s_{0}\) :
-
Specific entropy at the reference state, \(({\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}}{\text{.K}})\)
- \(\dot{m}\) :
-
Mass flow rate, \({\text{kg}}/{\text{s}}\)
- \(\dot{W}_{T}\) :
-
Turbine work rate, \(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- \(\dot{W}_{P}\) :
-
Pump work rate, \(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- \(\dot{s}_{{{\text{gen}}}} |_{{{\text{sep}}}}\) :
-
Rate of entropy generation in the separator, \({\text{W}}/{\text{m}}{\text{.K}}\)
- \(T_{{{\text{sep}}}}\) :
-
Separator Temperature, \({\text{K}}\)
- \(P_{{{\text{cond}}}}\) :
-
Condenser pressure, \(\left( {{\text{bar}}} \right)\)
- \(e_{x, i}\) :
-
Specific flow exergy for state ‘\(i\)’ \(\left( {{\text{kJ}}/{\text{kg}}} \right)\)
- \(\dot{\varepsilon }_{i}\) :
-
Exergy rate at state i \(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- \(\eta_{{{\text{en}}}}\) :
-
Energy efficiency, \(\left( \% \right)\)
- \(\eta_{{{\text{en}}}}\) :
-
Energy efficiency, \(\left( \% \right)\)
- \(\eta_{T}\) :
-
Isentropic efficiency of turbine, \(\left( \% \right)\)
- \(\eta_{P}\) :
-
Isentropic efficiency of pump (%)
- \(\eta_{{{\text{ex}}, {\text{comp}}}}\) :
-
Exergy efficiency of the component, (%)
- \(\dot{\varepsilon }_{d,v}\) :
-
Rate of exergy destruction in the expansion valve,\(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- \(\dot{\varepsilon }_{d,s}\) :
-
Rate of exergy destruction in the separator, \(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- \(\dot{\varepsilon }_{d,T}\) :
-
Rate of exergy destruction in the turbine, \(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- \(\dot{\varepsilon }_{{d, {\text{cond}}}}\) :
-
Rate of exergy destruction in the condenser, \(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- \(\dot{\varepsilon }_{d, P}\) :
-
Rate of exergy destruction in the pump, \(\left( {{\text{kW}}} \right)\)
- Exp. Valve:
-
Expansion valve
- ST:
-
Steam turbine
- \({\text{kW}}\) :
-
Kilowatt
- \({\text{MW}}\) :
-
Megawatt
- \({\text{K}}\) :
-
Kelvin
- \({\text{kJ}}\) :
-
Kilojoule
- \({\text{kg}}\) :
-
Kilogram
- \(d\) :
-
Destruction
- \(0\) :
-
Reference state
- \(v\) :
-
Expansion valve
- \({\text{cond}}\) :
-
Condenser
- \(s\) :
-
Isentropic condition
References
Abdul AKK, Harinarayana T (2007) Magnetotelluric evidence of potential geothermal resource in Puga, Ladakh, NW Himalaya. Curr Sci 93(3):323–329. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228372106_Magnetotelluric_evidence_of_potential_geothermal_resource_in_Puga_Ladakh_NW_Himalaya
Absar A, Kumar V, Bajpai I, Sinha AK, Kapoor A (1996) Reservoir modelling of Puga geothermal system, Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir. Geology 45:69–74
Ahangar FA (2012) Feasibility study of developing a binary power plant in the low-temperature geothermal field in Puga, Jammu and Kashmir, India. In: Proceedings of the Geothermal Training Programme, United Nations University, Iceland, 2012.
Akpan AE, Naraynanan M, Tirumalachetty H (2014) Estimation of subsurface temperatures in the Tattapani geothermal field, Central India, from limited volume of magnetotelluric data and borehole thermograms using a constructive back-propagation neural network. Earth Interact. https://doi.org/10.1175/2013EI000539.1
Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M (1996) Thermal design and optimization. Wiley, Hoboken
Chandrasekharam D, Alam Md A, Minissale A (2003) Geothermal resource potential of Himachal Pradesh, India. In: Proceedings of the International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavik, September 2003 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267416783_Geothermal_resource_potential_of_Himachal_Pradesh_India
El Mamdouh HA, Yashar A, Salar R, Bashria Y, Mohammadreza P (2021) Energy and exergy analyses of single flash geothermal power plant at optimum separator temperature. Int J Low Carbon Technol 16(3):873–881. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctab014
Gupta ML, Sharma SR, Singh SB, Drolia RK (1979) Geophysical exploration and assessment of power potential of Puga geothermal field. Geoviews 6:1–4
Harinarayana T, Abdul AKK, Murthy DN, Veeraswamy K, Rao SPE, Manoj C, Naganjaneyulu K (2006) Exploration of geothermal structure in Puga geothermal field, Ladakh Himalayas, India by magnetotelluric studies. J Appl Geophys 58:280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.05.005
IRENA (2018) Renewable energy statistics. The International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi https://www.irena.org//media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Apr/IRENA_Report_GET_2018.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2023
Jalilinasrabady S, Itoi R, Fujii H, Tanaka, T (2010) Energy and exergy analysis of Sabalan geothermal power plant, Iran. In: Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Bali, Indonesia, 25–29 April 2010
Jeanne P, Jonny R, Craig H, Julio G, Patrick FD, Mark W (2014) R Reservoir structure and properties from geomechanical modeling and microseismicity analyses associated with an enhanced geothermal system at the Geysers, California. Geothermics 51:460–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.02.003
Jha SK, Puppala H (2017) Assessment of subsurface temperature distribution from the gauged wells of Puga Valley Ladakh. Geotherm Energy 5(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-017-0061-4
Jha SK, Puppala H (2018) Conceptual modeling and characterization of Puga geothermal reservoir, Ladakh, India. Geothermics 72:326–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.12.004
Jha SK, Puppala H, Kumar MSM (2020) 3D characterization of thermo-hydro-geological fields and estimation of power potential from Puga geothermal reservoir, Ladakh, India. Ren Egy 146:1510–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.006
Kotas TJ (2012) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Exergon Publishing Company UK Ltd, London
Kumar R, Singh SB, Mohan GL, Rao GV (1982) Geophysical surveys in Parvati valley geothermal field, Kullu, India. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 13(3):213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(82)90051-8
Luo C, Zhao J, Gong Y, Wang Y, MA W (2016) Energy efficiency comparison between geothermal power systems. Therm Sci 21: 74–75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301237719_Energy_efficiency_comparison_between_geothermal_power_systems
Nardini I (2022) Geothermal power generation. In: Hafner M, Luciani G (eds) The palgrave handbook of international energy economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86884-0_11
Pambudi NA, Itoi R, Jalilinasrabady S, Jaelani K (2014) Exergy analysis and optimization of Dieng single-flash geothermal power plant. Egy Convers Mgmt 78:405–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.073
Puppala H, Jha SK (2019) Extraction schemes to harness geothermal energy from Puga geothermal field, India. Energy Sour Part A Recov Utilizat Environ Effects 43(15):1912–1932. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1668086
Shanker R, Absar AKK, Srivastava GC, Bajpai I (1976) Case study of Puga geothermal system, India. Geological Survey of India. Shanker1.pdf (stanford.edu)
Wang J, Wang J, Dai Y, Zhao P (2015) Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power generation system. Geothermics 55:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.01.012
Yari M (2010) Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants. Ren Energy 35:112–212
Zhang LX, Pang MY, Han J, Li YY, Wang CB (2019) Geothermal power in China: development and performance evaluation. Ren Sus Egy Rev 116:109431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109431
Acknowledgements
We, the authors of this work would like to pay our heartfelt gratitude to the available literary works and their contributors who have contributed immensely to the development in the field of geothermal energy and its conversion systems.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that the present article is free from any conflict of interest from any parties. There is also no conflict of interest with anyone as to any material or funding concerning the present manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dutta, J., Haloi, P., Kumar, A. et al. Thermodynamic Analysis of a Single-Flash Geothermal Power Plant in the Puga Valley, Ladakh, India. Trans Indian Natl. Acad. Eng. 9, 189–198 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-023-00441-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-023-00441-8