Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance of a plastic scintillation fiber dosimeter based on different photoelectric devices

  • Published:
Nuclear Science and Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The photoelectric device of a scintillation dosimeter converts photons produced by radiation into an electrical signal. Its features directly determine the overall performance of the dosimeter. For a plastic scintillation fiber dosimeter (PSFD) with a current readout mode, systematic studies of the stability and light-dose response were performed for the photomultiplier tube (PMT), silicon photomultiplier (SiPM), avalanche photodiode (APD), and photodiode (PD). The temperature stability, long-term stability, repeatability, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and current dose response of the PSFD with the abovementioned photoelectric devices were studied using a pulsed LED light source and the Small Animal Radiation Therapy platform. An exponential relationship between the dark/net current and temperature was obtained for all the devices. It is shown that the APD is the most sensitive device to temperature, with a current dependence on temperature reaching 6.5\(\%\,^{\circ }\hbox {C}^{-1}\) at room temperature, whereas for the other devices this dependence is always \(<{0.6}{\%\,^{\circ }\hbox {C}^{-1}}\). In terms of long-term stability, the net current of PD can change by up to 4% when working continuously for 8 h and 2% when working intermittently for 32 h, whereas for the other devices, the changes are all <1%. For the dose response, the PMT and SiPM exhibit excellent linear responses and SNRs within the range of 0.1–60 Gy/min. For the PSFD with a current readout mode, the performance of the PMT and SiPM is concluded to be better than that of the other devices in the study. In particular, the SiPM, which has a compact size, low bias voltage, and antimagnetic interference, has great advantages for further applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Essers, B. Mijnheer, In vivo dosimetry during external photon beam radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 43(2), 245–259 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00341-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.S. Beddar, Plastic scintillation dosimetry and its application to radiotherapy. Radiat. Meas. 41, S124–S133 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.01.002

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G.P. Fonseca, J.G. Johansen, R.L. Smith et al., In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 16, 1–11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Celi, E. Costa, C. Wessels et al., EPID based in vivo dosimetry system: clinical experience and results. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 17, 262–276 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Parodi, J.C. Polf, In-vivo range verification in particle therapy. Med. Phys. 62, L41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diode in Vivo Dosimetry for Patients Receiving External Beam Radiation Therapy. AAPM REPORT NO. 87 https://doi.org/10.37206/881

  7. R. Consorti, A. Petrucci, F. Fortunato et al., In vivo dosimetry with MOSFETs: dosimetric characterization and first clinical results in intraoperative radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 63(3), 952–960 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Chai, L. Chen, C.P. Yang et al., Evaluation of CdZnTe spectrometer performance in measuring energy spectra during interventional radiology procedure. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 30, 137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0661-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A.S. Beddar, T.R. Mackie, F.H. Attix, Water-equivalent plastic scintillation detectors for high-energy beam dosimetry: II. Properties and measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 37(10), 1901 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/37/10/007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Berra, V. Conti, D. Lietti et al., A SiPM based real time dosimeter for radiotherapic beams. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 773, 72–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.11.001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Berra, A. Ferri, C. Novati et al., Single and multichannel scintillating fiber dosimeter for radiotherapic beams with SiPM readout. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 838, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.08.068

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. De Gerone, S. Dussoni, F. Gatti et al., Development and characterization of scintillating fiber-APD-based detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 610, 218–221 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.05.159

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Rego, L. Peralta, M. da Concei Abreu, A Scintillating Fiber Dosimeter for Radiology and Brachytherapy with photodiode readout. arXiv:1109.6545v1(2011)

  14. F. Therriault-Proulx, T.M. Briere, F. Mourtada et al., A phantom study of an in vivo dosimetry system using plastic scintillation detectors for real-time verification of \(^192\)Ir HDR brachytherapy. Med. Phys. 38, 2542–2551 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3572229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. O’Keeffe, D. McCarthy, P. Woulfe et al., A review of recent advances in optical fibre sensors for in vivo dosimetry during radiotherapy. Med. Phys. 88, 1050 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Boivin, S. Beddar, M. Guillemette et al., Systematic evaluation of photodetector performance for plastic scintillation dosimetry. Med. Phys. 42, 6211–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4931979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C.P. Yang, J. Xin, D.D. Zhou et al., Development of a SiPM-based practical plastic scintillation fiber dosimeter. Nucl. Tech. 42, 100402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2019.hjs.42.100402 (in Chinese)

  18. H.M. Araujo, A. Bewick, D. Davidge et al., Low-temperature study of 35 photomultiplier tubes for the ZEPLIN III experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 521, 407–415 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2003.10.094

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Lyashenko, T. Nguyen, A. Snyder et al., Measurement of the absolute Quantum Efficiency of Hamamatsu model R11410-10 photomultiplier tubes at low temperatures down to liquid xenon boiling point. J. Instrum. 9, P11021 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/9/11/P11021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A.N. Otte, D. Garcia, T. Nguyen et al., Characterization of three high efficiency and blue sensitive silicon photomultipliers. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 846, 106–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.09.053

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Yang, S. Dzhosyuk, J.M. Gabrielse et al., Performance of a large-area avalanche photodiode at low temperature for scintillation detection. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 508, 388–393 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01665-6

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Yin, J. Lambert, D.R. McKenzie et al., Real-time monitoring and diagnosis of scintillation dosimeters using an ultraviolet light emitting diode. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 2303 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/9/007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H.M.L. Rosales, P. Duguay-Drouin, L. Archambault et al., Optimization of a multipoint plastic scintillator dosimeter for high dose rate brachytherapy. Med. Phys. 46, 2412–2421 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.A. Seibert, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging (Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Yue Yang, Cui-Ping Yang, and Ren-Sheng Wang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ren-Sheng Wang, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei-Wei Qu, Liang Hu or Ren-Sheng Wang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M621818), the National Key Research and Development Project (Nos. 2017YFF0206205 and 2016YFB0501303), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51873137 and 11705123), and the Project of the State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University (No. GZN1201801).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Yang, CP., Xin, J. et al. Performance of a plastic scintillation fiber dosimeter based on different photoelectric devices. NUCL SCI TECH 32, 120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00965-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00965-0

Keywords

Navigation