Abstract
Bubble formation is an integral part of the two-phase flow science. Through numerical simulation and experiments using different air flow rates and orifice diameters, the present study aims at investigating the behavior of bubble formation and evolution from vertical wall orifice in quiescent pure water. For the experiments, the images of the bubble formation process under different working conditions were recorded using a high-speed camera and analyzed the entire process. The bubble formation process can be divided into three stages, namely nucleation, stable growth, and necking. According to the obtained results, bubble forms only when the air-phase pressure exceeds the threshold pressure at wall orifice. Due to the influence of the threshold pressure and buoyancy, the bubble volume decreases with an increase in the wall orifice diameter for the same flow rate. Moreover, the volume of fluid method is applied to simulate bubble formation in a three-dimensional model and the “buffer volume” is considered in the simulation model. The simulation results matched well with the experimental data, which proves the existence of threshold pressure and the periodic pressure fluctuation at the wall orifice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.C. Robertson, MSRE design and operation report I, ORNL-0728. (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1965), pp. 205–243
W.C. Tang, C.Q. Yan, L.C. Sun et al., Characteristic of bubble breakup in venture-type bubble generator. Atomic Engergy Sci. Technol. 48(5), 843–847 (2014). https://doi.org/10.7538/yzk.2014.48.05.0844. (in Chinese)
X.F. Ju, L.C. Sun, W.C. Tang et al., Analysis of the operating characteristics of a Venturi-type bubble generator for MSR. Nucl. Tech. 37(12), 120605 (2014). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.120605. (in Chinese)
N. Kantarci, F. Borak, K.O. Ulgen, Bubble column reactors. Process Biochem. 40, 2263–2283 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.10.004
N. Yang, J.H. Chen, H. Zhao et al., Explorations on the multi-scale flow structure and stability condition in bubble columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 6978–6991 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.08.034
G.Q. Yang, B. Du, L.S. Fan, Bubble formation and dynamics in gas-liquid-solid fluidization—a review. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 2–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.021
N. Yang, Z.Y. Wu, J.H. Chen et al., Multi-scale analysis of gas–liquid interaction and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 3212–3222 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.029
M. Pourtousi, J. Sahu, P. Ganesan, Effect of interfacial forces and turbulence models on predicting flow pattern inside the bubble column. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 75, 38–47 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2013.11.001
M. Pourtousi, J. Sahu, P. Ganesan, S. Shamshirband et al., A combination of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy system (ANFIS) for prediction of the bubble column hydrodynamics. Powder Technol. 274, 466–481 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetec.2015.01.038
G.H. Yeoh, J. Tu, Computational Techniques for Multiphase (Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 2010), pp. 351–353
M. Pourtousi, P. Ganesan, A. Kazemzadeh et al., Methane bubble formation and dynamics in a rectangular bubble column: a CFD study. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 147, 111–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.003
M. Jamialahmadi, M.R. Zehtaban, H. Müller-Steinhagen et al., Study of bubble formation under constant flow conditions. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 79, 523–532 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1205/02638760152424299
X. Zhu, Q. Liao, H. Wang et al., Experimental Study of bubble growth and departure at the tip of capillary tubes with various wettabilities in a stagnant liquid. J. Supercond. Novel Magn. 23(6), 1141–1145 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-010-0723-y
L. Zhang, M. Shoji, Aperiodic bubble formation from a submerged orifice. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56(18), 5371–5381 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00241-X
V.V. Buwa, D. Derlach, F. Durst et al., Numerical simulation of bubble formation on submerged orifice: period-1 and period-2 bubbling regimes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62(24), 7119–7132 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.08.061
A. Bhunia, S.C. Pais, Y. Kamotan et al., Bubble formation in a coflow normal and reduced configuration in gravity. AIChE J. 44(7), 1499–1509 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690440704
H.K. Nahra, Y. Kamotani, Bubble formation from wall orifice in liquid cross-flow under low gravity. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 4653–4665 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00102-0
H.K. Nahra, Y. Kamotani, Prediction of bubble diameter at detachment from a wall orifice in liquid cross-flow under reduced and normal gravity conditions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 55–69 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00516-X
I. Chakraborty, G. Biswas, P.S. Ghoshdastidar, A coupled level-set and volume-of-fluid method for the buoyant rise of gas bubbles in liquids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 58, 240–259 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016//j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.02.053
J. Xie, X. Zhu, Q. Liao et al., Dynamics of bubble formation and detachment from an immersed micro-orifice on a plate. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 55, 3205–3213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016//j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.027
J. Zhang, Y. Yu, C. Qu et al., Experimental study and numerical simulation of periodic bubble formation at submerged micron-sized nozzles with constant gas flow rate. Chem. Eng. Sci. 168, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.04.012
Y.J. Zhang, M.Y. Liu, Y.G. Xu et al., Three-dimensional volume of fluid simulations on bubble formation and dynamics in bubble columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 73, 55–78 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.01.012
K. Mukundakrishnan, S. Quan, D.M. Eckmann et al., Numerical study of wall effects on buoyant gas-bubble rise in a liquid-filled finite cylinder. Phys. Rev. E 76, 036308–01–15 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036308
K.Y. Zhang, Y.Q. Feng, P. Schwarz et al., Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of bubble dynamics in the aluminum smelting process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52(33), 11378–11390 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303464a
Z.B. Zhao, Y.Q. Feng, P. Schwarz et al., Numerical modeling of flow dynamics in the aluminum smelting process: comparison between air-Water and CO2-cryolite systems. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 48, 1200–1216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0872-x
K.B. Cai, Y.C. Song, J.J. Li et al., Pressure and velocity fluctuation in the numerical simulation of bubble detachment in a Venturi-type bubble generator. Nucl. Technol. 205, 94–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1479575
D. Ma, M.Y. Liu, Y.G. Zu et al., Two-dimensional volume of fluid simulation studies on single bubble formation and dynamics in bubble columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 72, 61–77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.01.013
W. Helden, C. Geld, P. Boot, Forces on bubbles growing and detaching in flow along a vertical wall. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 38(11), 2075–2088 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(94)00319-Q
J.F. Klausner, R. Mei, D.M. Bernhard et al., Vapor bubble departure in forced convection boiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 36(3), 651–662 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(93)80041-r
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA0202000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11535009).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, ZW., Wu, XL., Zhang, Q. et al. Bubble formation and evolution behavior from vertical wall orifice. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0709-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0709-9