Abstract
For a characteristic γ-ray with interlaced overlap peak, and the case where its reliable and credible net count cannot be obtained using the current high-purity germanium (HPGe) multichannel γ-ray spectrum software, two new methods are proposed herein to obtain the γ-ray net peak count from the interlaced overlap peak in the HPGe γ-ray spectrometer system, of which one is the symmetric conversion method based on Gaussian distribution and the other is where the energy average value of two close γ-rays is regarded as the γ-ray energy. The experimental results indicate that the two methods mentioned above are reliable and credible. This study is significant for the development of better γ-ray spectrum processing software for measuring complex γ-ray spectra concerning the nuclear reaction cross section, neutron activation analysis, and analysis of transuranium elements, using an HPGe detector.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.J. Bai, Z.P. Zheng, D.X. Gao et al., Extensive application and independent research progress of HPGe detector. Nucl. Phys. Rev. 33, 52–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.11804/NuclPhysRev.33.01.052
J. Zhong, X.G. Wu, Y.J. Ma et al., A development of lifetime measurement based on the differential decay curve method. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29, 108-1-7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0453-6
C.Y. Xiong, M.Z. Liu, Z. Zuo et al., Ballistic deficit compensation method for a large-volume HPGe detector at high count rates. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 27, 67-1-9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0063-0
X.M. Zhou, G.M. Liu, D. Li et al., Using activation method to measure neutron spectrum in an irradiation chamber of a research reactor. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 25, 010603-1-5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.25.010603
S.U. Rehman, S.M. Mirza, N.M. Mirza et al., GEANT4 simulation of photo-peak efficiency of small high purity germanium detectors for nuclear power plant applications. Ann. Nucl. Energy 38, 112–117 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.08.010
W.X. Yu, X.L. Huang, X.J. Chen et al., Evaluation of the relative γ-ray intensities emitted from 56Co and 66Ga. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 20, 363–368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.20.363-368
M.A. Mariscotti, A method for automatic identification for peaks in the presence of background and its application to spectrum analysis. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 50, 309–320 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554x(67)90058-4
V.E. Levis, K.J. Zieba, A transfer standard for d + T neutron fluence and energy. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 174, 141–144 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(80)90422-X
NuDat 2.6 (selected evaluated nuclear structure data), Decay Radiation database version of 2017-5-18, IAEA Nuclear Data Services. https://www-nds.iaea.org/
R.B. Firestone, V.S. Shirley, Table of Isotopes (Wiley, New York, 1996)
X.Z. Kong, R. Wang, Y.C. Wang et al., Cross sections for 13.5–14.7 MeV neutron induced reactions on palladium isotopes. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 50, 361–364 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(97)10144-0
F.Q. Zhou, X.Q. Yang, W.F. Wang et al., A formula used to subtract the effect of γ-ray of the others to that of measured reaction in measurement of cross section of nuclear reaction and its application. Chin. Phys. C 32, 873–976 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/32/11/005
A.A. Filatenkov, Neutron activation cross sections measured at KRI in neutron energy region 13.4–14.9 MeV. USSR Report to the INDC. No.0460, Austria (2016). https://www-nds.iaea.org/publications/indc/indc-ccp-0460-rev.pdf
A.A. Filatenkov, S.V. Chuvaev, Experimental determination of cross sections for several insufficiently known neutron induced reaction on heavy nuclei (Z = 74–79). Khlopin Radiev. Inst., Leningrad Reports, No. 259 (2003). http://www-nds.iaea.org/EXFOR/41428.052
S.M. Qaim, C. Graca, Neutron activation cross sections at 14.7 MeV for isotopes of tungsten. Nucl. Phys. A 242, 317–322 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(75)90052-4
A.A. Filatenkov, S.V. Chuvaev, V.A. Yakovlev et al., Rept: Khlopin Radiev. Inst., Leningrad Reports, No. 252 (1999). http://www-nds.iaea.org/EXFOR/41298.092
A. Poularikas, R.W. Fink, D.G. Gardner, Absolute activation cross-sections for 14.8 neutrons. University of Arkansas Reports, No. 59, 4 (1960). http://www-nds.iaea.org/EXFOR/12181.004
S. Murahira, Y. Satoh, N. Honda, et al., Measurement of formation cross sections producing short-lived nuclei by 14 MeV neutrons-Pr, Ba, Ce, Sm, W, Sn, Hf. Conf: Japanese report to the INDC., No. 175, 171 (1996). http://www-nds.iaea.org/EXFOR/22311.014
S.K. Mukherjee, H. Bakhru, Some (n,α) reaction cross-sections and the resulting radio-isotopes. Conf: Nucl. and Sol. State Physics Symp., Bombay, 244 (1963). http://www-nds.iaea.org/EXFOR/31330.012
R.F. Coleman, B.E. Hawker, L.P. Oonnor et al., Cross sections for (n,p) and (n,α) reactions with 14.5 MeV neutrons. Proc. Phys. Soc. 73, 215–220 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/73/2/308
Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF),Database Version of 2017-06-01, Nuclear Data Services. https://www-nds.iaea.org/
M. Wagner, H. Vonach, A. Pavlik et al., Evaluation of cross sections for 14 important neutron-dosimetry reactions. Phys. Daten Phys. Data 13–5, 183 (1990)
Acknowledgements
We thank the crew of the K-400 Neutron Generator at Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry China Academy of Engineering Physics for performing irradiation work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11575090, 11605099) and the Young Key Teachers Training Program of He’nan Higher Education in China (No. 2015GGJS-258).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, YL., Zhou, FQ., Li, Y. et al. Methods for obtaining characteristic γ-ray net peak count from interlaced overlap peak in HPGe γ-ray spectrometer system. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0525-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0525-7