Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Rights, Disability, and Mindfulness

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) has identified and articulated the rights of people with disabilities, mandating how these rights should be upheld and protected by countries. The objective of this article is to explore how these rights can be translated into action for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

Method

We conceptualize what human rights mean in the context of people with IDD, examine models of disability that have been utilized to provide services, and explore how mindfulness research and practices could be better aligned with the CRPD.

Results

We present five core principles of interdependent human rights of people with IDD and highlight five key challenges that hinder the realization of their fundamental rights and freedoms, which are intrinsic to the dignity of all human beings and are an essential component of a just and equitable society. We delve into the key Articles of the CRPD that underpin these rights and freedoms. Various models of services for people with IDD have been developed and implemented. We underscore the strengths and limitations of the medical, social, and biopsychosocial models, and provide an overview of the emergent human rights model that is based on the CRPD. Mindfulness is discussed in the context of other interventions as an adjunctive treatment and a potential intervention that could address some concerns expressed in the CRPD.

Conclusions

Human rights, disability, and mindfulness are inextricably linked and could be strengthened to advance equity and full inclusion of people with IDD in our society. Impairment cannot be used as a basis for denying or restricting their rights. We need to promote the understanding that disability is an essential part of human diversity, and people with disabilities contribute unique and crucial perspectives in a just and enlightened society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

This is a review article, and no data are included.

References

  • Amaro, B., & Singh, N. N. (2021). Mindfulness: Definitions, attributes, and mechanisms. In N. N. Singh, & S. D. Singh Joy (Eds.), Mindfulness-based interventions with children and adolescents: Research and practice (pp. 11–33). Routledge.

  • American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Association.

  • Bailey, K., Harris, S. J., & Simpson, S. (2015). Stammering and the social model of disability: Challenge and opportunity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 193, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, L. (2009). Disability, physical education and sport: Some critical observations and questions. In H. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Disability and youth sport (pp. 39–50). Routledge.

  • Blustein, J. (2012). Philosophical and ethical issues in disability. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 9, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-00904002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrell-Carrió, F., Suchman, A. L., & Epstein, R. M. (2004). The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(6), 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, I. (2004). Perceptions of disability and their impact upon involvement in sport for people with disabilities at all levels. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 28, 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723504268729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. H., & Rohrbaugh, R. M. (2015). The biopsychosocial formulation manual: A guide for mental health professionals. Routledge.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020). Disability and health promotionhttps://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability.html.

  • Coles, J. (2001). The social model of disability: What does it mean for practice in services for people with learning difficulties? Disability & Society, 16, 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120059504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2016). Quality of life. In N. N. Singh (Ed.), Handbook of evidence-based practices in intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 169–227). Springer.

  • Degener, T. (2016a). A human rights model of disability. In P. Blanck, & E. Flynn (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability law and human rights (pp. 31–49). Routledge.

  • Degener, T. (2016b). Disability in a human rights context. Laws, 5, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degener, T. (2017a). A new human rights model of disability. In V. D. Fina, R. Cera, & G. Palmisano (Eds.), The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A commentary. Springer.

  • Degener, T. (2017b). 10 years of Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(3), 152–157. Social Work Chronicle, 4(1), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.21863/swc/2015.4.1and2.001.

  • DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. (2015). Disability as disjuncture: A theory to guide social work practice. Social Work Chronicle, 4, https://doi.org/10.21863/swc/2015.4.1and2.001.

  • Donoghue, C. (2003). Challenging the authority of the medical definition of disability: An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm. Disability & Society, 18(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000052833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for bio-medicine. Science, 196, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.137.5.535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. L. (1988). How much longer must medicine’s science be bounded by a seventeenth century world view? In K. L. White (Ed.), The task of medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg (pp. 113–136). The Henry Kaiser Family Foundation.

  • Felver, J. C., Clawson, A. J., Ash, T. L., Martens, B. K., Wang, Q., & Singh, N. N. (2022). Meta-analysis of mindfulness-based program soles of the feet for disruptive behaviors. Behavior Modification, 46(6), 1488–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455211073738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, H. (2006). Disability and physical education. In D. Kirk, D. MacDonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 752–766). Sage.

  • Goering, S. (2015). Rethinking disability: The social model of disability and chronic Disease. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 8(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9273-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haegele, J. A., & Hodge, S. (2016). Disability discourse: Overview and critiques of the medical and social models. Quest, 68(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1143849

  • Higgins, J. P. T., Lasserson, T., Thomas, J., Flemyng, E., & Churchill, R. (2023). Methodological expectations of Cochrane intervention reviews. Cochrane. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401

  • Humpage, L. (2007). Models of disability, work, and welfare in Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 41, 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.2007.41.issue-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. K., & Singh, N. N. (2023). Mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions. In P. Sturmey, R. Lang, & J. K. Luiselli (Eds.), Lifespan treatment of autism spectrum disorder: An evidence-based guide for professionals and families. Oxford University Press.

  • Jorgensen, M., Nankervis, K., & Chan, J. (2023). Environments of concern’: Reframing challenging behavior within a human rights approach. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 69(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.2118513.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

  • Lawson, A., & Beckett, A. E. (2021). The social and human rights models of disability: Towards a complementarity thesis. International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, J. M. (2017). Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: In response to Mike Oliver. Disability & Society, 32(4), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoBianco, A. F., & Sheppard-Jones, K. (2008). Perceptions of disability as related to medical and social factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00143.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard-Vance, R., Soye, E., Ferri, D., McEvoy, E., MacLachlan, M., & Sarlio-Siintola, S. (2023). Applying the Human rights Model of disability to informed consent: Experiences and reflections from the SHAPES project. Disabilities, 3, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities3010003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matko, K., Ott, U., & Sedlmeier, P. (2021). What do meditators do when they meditate? Proposing a novel basis for future meditation research. Mindfulness, 12, 1791–1811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01641-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McTigue, P. (2015). From Navas to Kaltoft: The European Court of Justice’s evolving definition of disability and the implications for HIV-positive individuals. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 15(4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229115591653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060160040501.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, J., & Weiss, N. R. (2021). Pain and shock in America: Politics, advocacy, and the controversial treatment of people with disabilities. Brandeis University Press.

  • Oliver, M. (1983). Social work with disabled people. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The New Politics of disablement. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Palmer, M., & Harley, D. (2012). Models and measurement in disability: An international review. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, T. R. (2023). Rights are necessary but insufficient for the achievement of the full inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-023-00351-4.

  • Pfeiffer, D. (2001). The conceptualization of disability. In B. M. Altman, & S. Barnartt (Eds.), Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: Vol. 2. Research in social science and disability (pp. 29–52). Elsevier.

  • Quinn, G., & Degener, T. (2002). Human rights and disability: The current use and future potential of United Nations human rights instruments in the context of disability. United Nations.

  • Reindal, S. M. (2008). A social relational model of disability: A theoretical framework for special needs education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250801947812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reindal, S. M. (2009). Disability, capability, and special education: Towards a capability-based theory. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250902793610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, C. A. (2020). Why we do not need a ‘stronger’ social model of disability. Disability & Society, 35(9), 1509–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1809349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, K. A., & Singh, N. N. (2022). Intervening from the Inside Out: Exploring the role of self–determination and mindfulness–based interventions for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 6, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-022-00252-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. N., & Hwang, S. K. (2020). Mindfulness-based programs and practices for people with intellectual and developmental disability. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 33, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. N., & Hwang, S. K. (2021). Mindfulness in intellectual and developmental disabilities. In N. N. Singh, & S. D. Singh Joy (Eds.), Mindfulness-based interventions with children and adolescent: Research and practice (pp. 96–118). Routledge.

  • Singh, N. N., & Singh Joy, S. D. (2021). Teaching mindfulness to adolescents. In N. N. Singh, & S. D. Singh Joy (Eds.), Mindfulness-based interventions with children and adolescent: Research and practice (pp. 162–178). Routledge.

  • Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Hwang, S. K., & Myers, R. E. (2022). Mindfulness: Therapeutic applications for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. In L. L. Matson, & P. Sturmey (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorder (pp. 1283–1300). Springer.

  • Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Myers, R. E., Hwang, Y. S., & Medvedev, O. N. (2024). Mindfulness and disability. In E. Andrews, K. Ayers, D. S. Dunn, & M. Wehmeyer (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (2nd Edition). Oxford University Press.

  • United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Treaty Series, 2515, 3. I-44910-080000028017bf87.pdf.

  • Winance, M. (2016). Rethinking disability: Lessons from the past, questions for the future. Contributions and limits of the social model, the sociology of science and technology, and the ethics of care. European Journal of Disability Research, 10, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2016.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, R. (2017). Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated for autism: In response to Jonathan Levitt. Disability & Society, 32(7), 1090–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1328157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health WHO.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Queensland, Campbell Rd, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia

    Yoon-Suk Hwang & Jeffrey Chan

  2. Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, 30912, United States

    Nirbhay N. Singh

Authors
  1. Yoon-Suk Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nirbhay N. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoon-Suk Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This is a review paper and does not require an ethics approval.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, YS., Chan, J. & Singh, N.N. Human Rights, Disability, and Mindfulness. Adv Neurodev Disord 8, 7–16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-023-00375-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-023-00375-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation