Skip to main content
Log in

China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chinese Political Science Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, China has been actively seeking a leadership role in its region, while taking a more reluctant attitude toward global leadership. Drawing upon recent research on status in international relations, this article seeks to explain the variation in China’s leadership at regional and global levels. A rising power does not always maximize its status on the world stage. China seeks an active role in East Asia due to its strong interests and identity commitment within the region. However, China takes a more reluctant approach toward global leadership, because higher status brings additional responsibilities and risks. Due to various limitations, China cannot become a new hegemonic power. But China can be a co-leader in regional and global affairs, and it can also be a more active leader in the developing world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is based on purchasing power parity (PPP).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyu Pu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, X. China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. 3, 48–61 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6

Keywords

Navigation