Abstract
There is an increasing need for portable sleep monitoring in clinical practice, but there is no comparative study that used the same device for home and in-laboratory sleep monitoring and device close to full polysomnography (PSG) to evaluate the feasibility and preference of home unattended sleep monitoring. Twenty male participants with high risk for moderate to severe OSA based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire were included. The participants were randomly assigned to group A (home unattended monitoring after in-laboratory monitoring) or group B (in-laboratory monitoring after home unattended monitoring). A 2-week washout period was implemented between the sleep tests. All hook-up procedures were performed in laboratory. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire after finishing each sleep test. There was no difference in sleep efficiency, arousal index, or time spent in each sleep stage between the two monitoring modes using Nox-A1. Additionally, other respiratory parameters such as apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), supine AHI, and snoring time did not differ. A high and similar sensor quality for airflow, oxygen, and respiratory effort was observed in both monitoring groups. Patient’s feelings and satisfaction with the test were similar between in-laboratory and home monitoring, but preference rate for the in-laboratory test was higher than that for home monitoring (70% vs. 30%, respectively). These data suggest that home unattended monitoring with Nox-A1 type 2 ambulatory device is a feasible alternative diagnostic mode for high risk of moderate to severe OSA, yielding reliable quality recordings and high patient satisfaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(17):1230–5.
Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, Agusti AG. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1046–53.
Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Peppard PE, Nieto FJ, Hla KM. Burden of sleep apnea: rationale, design, and major findings of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort study. WMJ. 2009;108(5):246–9.
Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(9):1217–39.
Jennum P, Riha RL. Epidemiology of sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and sleep-disordered breathing. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(4):907–14.
Collop NA. Portable monitoring for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008;14(6):525–9.
Ghegan MD, Angelos PC, Stonebraker AC, Gillespie MB. Laboratory versus portable sleep studies: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(6):859–64.
Masa JF, Corral J, Pereira R, Duran-Cantolla J, Cabello M, Hernandez-Blasco L, Monasterio C, Alonso A, Chiner E, Rubio M, Garcia-Ledesma E, Cacelo L, Carpizo R, Sacristan L, Salord N, Carrera M, Sancho-Chust JN, Embid C, Vazquez-Polo FJ, Negrin MA, Montserrat JM. Effectiveness of home respiratory polygraphy for the diagnosis of sleep apnoea and hypopnoea syndrome. Thorax. 2011;66(7):567–73.
Practice parameters for the use of portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. Standards of Practice Committee of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Sleep. 1994;17(4):372–7.
Portier F, Portmann A, Czernichow P, Vascaut L, Devin E, Benhamou D, Cuvelier A, Muir JF. Evaluation of home versus laboratory polysomnography in the diagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:814–8.
Santos-Silva R, Sartori DE, Truksinas V, Truksinas E, Alonso FF, Tufik S, Bittencourt LR. Validation of a portable monitoring system for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 2009;32(5):629–36.
Xu L, Han F, Keenan BT, Kneeland-Szanto E, Yan H, Dong X, Chang Y, Zhao L, Zhang X, Li J, Pack AI, Kuna ST. Validation of the Nox-T3 portable monitor for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in chinese adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(5):675–83.
Zou J, Meng L, Liu Y, Xu X, Liu S, Guan J, Yin S, Yi H. Evaluation of a 2-channel portable device and a predictive model to screen for obstructive sleep apnea in a laboratory environment. Respir Care. 2015;60(3):356–62.
Brockmann PE, Perez JL, Moya A. Feasibility of unattended home polysomnography in children with sleep-disordered breathing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(12):1960–4.
Campbell AJ, Neill AM. Home set-up polysomnography in the assessment of suspected obstructive sleep apnea. J Sleep Res. 2011;20:207–13.
Fry JM, DiPhillipo MA, Curran K, Goldberg R, Baran AS. Full polysomnography in the home. Sleep. 1998;21(6):635–42.
Iber C, Redline S, Kaplan Gilpin AM, Quan SF, Zhang L, Gottlieb DJ, Rapoport D, Resnick HE, Sanders M, Smith P. Polysomnography performed in the unattended home versus the attended laboratory setting-Sleep Heart Health Study methodology. Sleep. 2004;27(3):536–40.
Chesson AL Jr, Berry RB, Pack A, American Academy of Sleep M, American Thoracic S. American College of Chest P. Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep. 2003;26(7):907–13.
Bruyneel M, Sanida C, Art G, Libert W, Cuvelier L, Paesmans M, Sergysels R, Ninane V. Sleep efficiency during sleep studies: results of a prospective study comparing home-based and in-hospital polysomnography. J Sleep Res. 2011;20(1 Pt 2):201–6.
Meyer TJ, Eveloff SE, Kline LR, Millman RP. One negative polysomnogram does not exclude obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1993;103(3):756–60.
Redline S, Tosteson T, Boucher MA, Millman RP. Measurement of sleep-related breathing disturbances in epidemiologic studies. Assessment of the validity and reproducibility of a portable monitoring device. Chest. 1991;100(5):1281–6.
Wittig RM, Romaker A, Zorick FJ, Roehrs TA, Conway WA, Roth T. Night-to-night consistency of apneas during sleep. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129(2):244–6.
Quan SF, Griswold ME, Iber C, Nieto FJ, Rapoport DM, Redline S, Sanders M, Young T, Sleep Heart Health Study Research G. Short-term variability of respiration and sleep during unattended nonlaboratory polysomnography—the Sleep Heart Health Study (corrected). Sleep. 2002;25(8):843–9.
Acknowledgements
We thank Kwangwoo MeDix, Inc. for supplying the Nox-A1 portable devices, Cho-Hee Hong for conducting sleep analysis, and Min-Joo Jeon for performing all hook-up procedures for the in-laboratory and home sleep test. This randomized crossover trial was registered at Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0002914).
Funding
This work was supported by Grant no. 06-2017-2300 from the SNUH Research Fund and Kwangwoo Medix, Inc. D.W.Y received a scholarship from the BK21-plus education program provided by the National Research Foundation of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: DW and HW; data collection: DW and IH; analysis and interpretation of data: DW, IH, IK, and HW; drafting the manuscript: DW and IH; revision for important intellectual content: DW, IH, IK, and HW.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the contents of this article.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. The Institutional Review Board at Seoul National University Hospital reviewed and approved the study protocol. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Seoul National University Hospital (No. 1706-041-858).
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, D.W., Hong, IH., Baik, I. et al. Evaluation of the feasibility and preference of Nox-A1 type 2 ambulatory device for unattended home sleep test: a randomized crossover study. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 17, 297–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-019-00213-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-019-00213-4