Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the feasibility and preference of Nox-A1 type 2 ambulatory device for unattended home sleep test: a randomized crossover study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Biological Rhythms Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an increasing need for portable sleep monitoring in clinical practice, but there is no comparative study that used the same device for home and in-laboratory sleep monitoring and device close to full polysomnography (PSG) to evaluate the feasibility and preference of home unattended sleep monitoring. Twenty male participants with high risk for moderate to severe OSA based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire were included. The participants were randomly assigned to group A (home unattended monitoring after in-laboratory monitoring) or group B (in-laboratory monitoring after home unattended monitoring). A 2-week washout period was implemented between the sleep tests. All hook-up procedures were performed in laboratory. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire after finishing each sleep test. There was no difference in sleep efficiency, arousal index, or time spent in each sleep stage between the two monitoring modes using Nox-A1. Additionally, other respiratory parameters such as apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), supine AHI, and snoring time did not differ. A high and similar sensor quality for airflow, oxygen, and respiratory effort was observed in both monitoring groups. Patient’s feelings and satisfaction with the test were similar between in-laboratory and home monitoring, but preference rate for the in-laboratory test was higher than that for home monitoring (70% vs. 30%, respectively). These data suggest that home unattended monitoring with Nox-A1 type 2 ambulatory device is a feasible alternative diagnostic mode for high risk of moderate to severe OSA, yielding reliable quality recordings and high patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(17):1230–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, Agusti AG. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1046–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Peppard PE, Nieto FJ, Hla KM. Burden of sleep apnea: rationale, design, and major findings of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort study. WMJ. 2009;108(5):246–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(9):1217–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jennum P, Riha RL. Epidemiology of sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and sleep-disordered breathing. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(4):907–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collop NA. Portable monitoring for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008;14(6):525–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghegan MD, Angelos PC, Stonebraker AC, Gillespie MB. Laboratory versus portable sleep studies: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(6):859–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Masa JF, Corral J, Pereira R, Duran-Cantolla J, Cabello M, Hernandez-Blasco L, Monasterio C, Alonso A, Chiner E, Rubio M, Garcia-Ledesma E, Cacelo L, Carpizo R, Sacristan L, Salord N, Carrera M, Sancho-Chust JN, Embid C, Vazquez-Polo FJ, Negrin MA, Montserrat JM. Effectiveness of home respiratory polygraphy for the diagnosis of sleep apnoea and hypopnoea syndrome. Thorax. 2011;66(7):567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Practice parameters for the use of portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. Standards of Practice Committee of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Sleep. 1994;17(4):372–7.

  10. Portier F, Portmann A, Czernichow P, Vascaut L, Devin E, Benhamou D, Cuvelier A, Muir JF. Evaluation of home versus laboratory polysomnography in the diagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:814–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos-Silva R, Sartori DE, Truksinas V, Truksinas E, Alonso FF, Tufik S, Bittencourt LR. Validation of a portable monitoring system for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 2009;32(5):629–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu L, Han F, Keenan BT, Kneeland-Szanto E, Yan H, Dong X, Chang Y, Zhao L, Zhang X, Li J, Pack AI, Kuna ST. Validation of the Nox-T3 portable monitor for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in chinese adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(5):675–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou J, Meng L, Liu Y, Xu X, Liu S, Guan J, Yin S, Yi H. Evaluation of a 2-channel portable device and a predictive model to screen for obstructive sleep apnea in a laboratory environment. Respir Care. 2015;60(3):356–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brockmann PE, Perez JL, Moya A. Feasibility of unattended home polysomnography in children with sleep-disordered breathing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(12):1960–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell AJ, Neill AM. Home set-up polysomnography in the assessment of suspected obstructive sleep apnea. J Sleep Res. 2011;20:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fry JM, DiPhillipo MA, Curran K, Goldberg R, Baran AS. Full polysomnography in the home. Sleep. 1998;21(6):635–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Iber C, Redline S, Kaplan Gilpin AM, Quan SF, Zhang L, Gottlieb DJ, Rapoport D, Resnick HE, Sanders M, Smith P. Polysomnography performed in the unattended home versus the attended laboratory setting-Sleep Heart Health Study methodology. Sleep. 2004;27(3):536–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chesson AL Jr, Berry RB, Pack A, American Academy of Sleep M, American Thoracic S. American College of Chest P. Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep. 2003;26(7):907–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruyneel M, Sanida C, Art G, Libert W, Cuvelier L, Paesmans M, Sergysels R, Ninane V. Sleep efficiency during sleep studies: results of a prospective study comparing home-based and in-hospital polysomnography. J Sleep Res. 2011;20(1 Pt 2):201–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer TJ, Eveloff SE, Kline LR, Millman RP. One negative polysomnogram does not exclude obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1993;103(3):756–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Redline S, Tosteson T, Boucher MA, Millman RP. Measurement of sleep-related breathing disturbances in epidemiologic studies. Assessment of the validity and reproducibility of a portable monitoring device. Chest. 1991;100(5):1281–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wittig RM, Romaker A, Zorick FJ, Roehrs TA, Conway WA, Roth T. Night-to-night consistency of apneas during sleep. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129(2):244–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Quan SF, Griswold ME, Iber C, Nieto FJ, Rapoport DM, Redline S, Sanders M, Young T, Sleep Heart Health Study Research G. Short-term variability of respiration and sleep during unattended nonlaboratory polysomnography—the Sleep Heart Health Study (corrected). Sleep. 2002;25(8):843–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kwangwoo MeDix, Inc. for supplying the Nox-A1 portable devices, Cho-Hee Hong for conducting sleep analysis, and Min-Joo Jeon for performing all hook-up procedures for the in-laboratory and home sleep test. This randomized crossover trial was registered at Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0002914).

Funding

This work was supported by Grant no. 06-2017-2300 from the SNUH Research Fund and Kwangwoo Medix, Inc. D.W.Y received a scholarship from the BK21-plus education program provided by the National Research Foundation of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: DW and HW; data collection: DW and IH; analysis and interpretation of data: DW, IH, IK, and HW; drafting the manuscript: DW and IH; revision for important intellectual content: DW, IH, IK, and HW.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun-Woo Shin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the contents of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. The Institutional Review Board at Seoul National University Hospital reviewed and approved the study protocol. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Seoul National University Hospital (No. 1706-041-858).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, D.W., Hong, IH., Baik, I. et al. Evaluation of the feasibility and preference of Nox-A1 type 2 ambulatory device for unattended home sleep test: a randomized crossover study. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 17, 297–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-019-00213-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-019-00213-4

Keywords

Navigation