Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation framework of online learning platform based on Pythagorean probabilistic linguistic information

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Granular Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The popularization of online education, particularly the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the past few years, has promoted the development of online learning platforms. Consequently, the importance of optimal evaluation methods for online learning platforms has been emphasized. However, the uncertain decision-making process and complex indicators in the development of online learning platforms bring challenges to the evaluation, making it more difficult to reach a consensus. To address these issues, an online learning platform quality evaluation index system was first constructed in this paper, including system functionality, instructional Resources, social interaction, and teaching effectiveness. Secondly, regarding the fuzzy complexity of online learning platform evaluation, the concept of Pythagorean probabilistic linguistic term set (PPLTS) was proposed, effectively describing and measuring the complex information in the evaluation process of online learning platforms. On this basis, a series of aggregation methods of PPLTS were proposed, including the Pythagorean probabilistic linguistic term weighted average (PPLTWA) operator, the Pythagorean probabilistic linguistic term ordered weighted average (PPLTOWA) operator, and so on. Finally, a multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation framework in the case of PPLTS was given, and its application in the selection of online learning platforms was studied. Finally, some relevant policy suggestions were put forward to promote the development of online learning platforms. This study will not only help enrich the evaluation index system of online learning platforms, but also provide scientific evaluation method reference for researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of the work are included within the paper.

References

  • Adair D, Alman SW, Budzick D, Grisham LM, Mancini ME, Thackaberry AS (2014) Many shades of MOOCs. J Online Learn Res Pract. https://doi.org/10.18278/il.3.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams AL (2020) Online teaching resources. Public Serv Q 16(3):172–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Almaiah MA, Alyoussef IY (2019) Analysis of the effect of course design, course content support, course assessment and instructor characteristics on the actual use of E-learning system. Ieee Access 7:171907–171922

    Google Scholar 

  • Apolloni B, Bassis S, Rota J, Galliani GL, Gioia M, Ferrari L (2016) A neurofuzzy algorithm for learning from complex granules. Granular Comput 1:225–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Arulogun OT, Akande ON, Akindele AT, Badmus TA (2020) Survey dataset on open and distance learning students’ intention to use social media and emerging technologies for online facilitation. Data Brief 31:105929

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Deb N (2021) Pythagorean fuzzy Schweizer and Sklar power aggregation operators for solving multi-attribute decision-making problems. Granular Comput 6:991–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyukozkan G, Arsenyan J, Ertek G (2010) Evaluation of e-learning web sites using fuzzy axiomatic design based approach. Int J Comput Intell Syst 3(1):28–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Chen SM (2001) A new method to measure the similarity between fuzzy numbers. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.(Cat. No. 01CH37297) vol. 3, pp 1123–1126. IEEE.

  • Chen SM, Phuong BDH (2017) Fuzzy time series forecasting based on optimal partitions of intervals and optimal weighting vectors. Knowl-Based Syst 118:204–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Wang CH (2009) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using α-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5576–5581

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CM, Chiu CS, Chang HC (2007) Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention. Inf Syst J 17(3):271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel J, Cano EV, Cervera MG (2015) The future of MOOCs: adaptive learning or business model? RUSC Univ Knowl Soc J 12(1):64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong J, Wan S, Chen SM (2021) Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making. Inf Sci 547:1080–1104

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eijkman H (2008) Web 2.0 as a non-foundational network-centric learning space. Campus-Wide Inform Syst 25(2):93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejegwa PA, Jana C, Pal M (2022) Medical diagnostic process based on modified composite relation on pythagorean fuzzy multi-sets. Granul Comput 7:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120(1):144–161

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ic YT, Yurdakul M (2021) Development of a new trapezoidal fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS hybrid approach for manufacturing firm performance measurement. Granul Comput 6:915–929

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang Z, He L (2018) Construction and practice of SPOC teaching mode based on MOOC. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 13(12):35

    Google Scholar 

  • Karal H, Cebi A, Turgut YE (2011) Perceptions of students who take synchronous courses through video conferencing about distance education. Turk Online J Educ Technol TOJET 10(4):276–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Wang X, Tan SC (2018) What makes MOOC users persist in completing MOOCs? A perspective from network externalities and human factors. Comput Hum Behav 85:385–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Li H, Zhang S, Zhong Z, Cheng J (2019) Intelligent learning system based on personalized recommendation technology. Neural Comput Appl 31:4455–4462

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin HF (2010) An application of fuzzy AHP for evaluating course website quality. Comput Educ 54(4):877–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YL, Lin HW, Hung TT (2015) Value hierarchy for massive open online courses. Comput Hum Behav 53:408–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Liu Q, Yang L, Wang G (2018) A multi-granularity collective behavior analysis approach for online social networks. Granul Comput 3:333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks RB, Sibley SD, Arbaugh JB (2005) A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. J Manag Educ 29(4):531–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslov I, Nikou S, Hansen P (2021) Exploring user experience of learning management system. Int J Inform Learn Technol 38(4):344–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastan IA, Sensuse DI, Suryono RR, Kautsarina K (2022) Evaluation of distance learning system (e-learning): a systematic literature review. J Teknoinfo 16(1):132–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda P, Isaias P, Pifano S (2015) Model for the evaluation of MOOC platforms. In: ICERI2015 Proceedings. IATED, pp 1199–1208

  • Mohammadi H (2015) Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: an integration of TAM and IS success model. Comput Hum Behav 45:359–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer SR, Holt DM (2009) Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. J Comput Assist Learn 25(2):101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang Q, Wang H, Xu Z (2016) Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Park SY (2009) An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. J Educ Technol Soc 12(3):150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellas N, Kazanidis I (2015) On the value of Second Life for students’ engagement in blended and online courses: a comparative study from the Higher Education in Greece. Educ Inf Technol 20:445–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi C, Liu S (2021) Evaluating on-line courses via reviews mining. IEEE Access 9:35439–35451

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2011) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong L, Wang L, Liu P, Zhu B (2021) Evaluation of MOOCs based on multigranular unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic MABAC method. Int J Intell Syst 36(10):5670–5713

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1988) What is the analytic hierarchy process? Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Anbarasan M, Praveen Kumar DJCI (2021) Design of online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques. Comput Intell 37(3):1166–1180

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Terras MM, Ramsay J (2015) Massive open online courses (MOOCs): insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. Br J Educ Technol 46(3):472–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Chiang CH, Li CW (2007) Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 32(4):1028–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R (2019) Massive open online course platform blended English teaching method based on model-view-controller framework. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 14(16):188

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Wang M, Jiang B, Li J (2018) A personalized recommendation system with combinational algorithm for online learning. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9:667–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2012) Linguistic decision making. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Huan S, Yang Y (2020) Application of big data technology in blended teaching of college students: a case study on rain classroom. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (IJET) 15(11):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye ZX, Luo R (2021) Evaluating online courses: how learners perceive language MOOCs. Lect Notes Comput Sci 12511:334–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Yepes-Baldó M, Romeo M, Martín C, García MÁ, Monzó G, Besolí A (2016) Quality indicators: developing “MOOCs” in the European higher education area. Educ Media Int 53(3):184–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousef AMF, Chatti MA, Schroeder U, Wosnitza M (2014) What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. In: 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE, pp. 44–48

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 18:338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SZ, Gu JX (2023) Coordination evaluation and dynamic adjustment mechanism of China’s green development at inter-provincial level. Ecol Ind 153:110419

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SZ, Hu YJ, Llopis-Albert C (2023) Stakeholder-inclusive multi-criteria development of smart cities. J Bus Res 154:113281

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Su WH, Zhang CK, Zeng SZ (2022) Evaluation and selection model of community group purchase platform based on WEPLPA-CPT-EDAS method. Comput Ind Eng 172:108573

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China

    Jiaxing Gu, Wendi Chen & Shouzhen Zeng

  2. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

    Dandan Luo

Authors
  1. Jiaxing Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wendi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dandan Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shouzhen Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JG and DL writing—original draft. WC methodology, visualization. SZ writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shouzhen Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any individual or organization or organization for the work.

Ethical approval

The work does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, J., Chen, W., Luo, D. et al. A multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation framework of online learning platform based on Pythagorean probabilistic linguistic information. Granul. Comput. 8, 1701–1714 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00392-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00392-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation