Skip to main content
Log in

Portfolio selection by cumulative prospect theory and its comparison with mean-variance model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modeling of risk and uncertainty in finance requires the consideration of several factors. One of the main factors in modeling is the decision-maker’s attitude towards risk. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has emerged as an important approach for assessing the actions of decision-makers under uncertainty with ambiguity. Considerable experimental evidence indicates that human behavior can differ significantly from the conventional expected utility maximization paradigm. CPT has the ability to model the irrationality of the decision makers’ behavior in real complex situations. This paper studies the portfolio selection problem based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT) risk criterion. We encounter two types of risks during problem handling, first internal (imposed by risk management departments) and second external (accredited regulatory institutions). Therefore, we propose a new CPT-based model for the portfolio selection problem under uncertainty with ambiguity. By taking some listed stocks from Nifty-50, the National Stock Exchange, India, as the study sample, the efficient frontier for the proposed CPT-based model is generated. The empirical analysis compares the classical Markowitz’s mean-variance efficient frontier with mean-variance values obtained by the proposed CPT-based efficient frontier. We also compare the investment performance of the behavioral investor with that of a rational investor. A detailed numerical illustration is presented to substantiate the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9(3):203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barber BM, Odean T (1999) The courage of misguided convictions. Financ Anal J 55(6):41–55. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n6.2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis N, Huang M (2008) Stocks as lotteries: the implications of probability weighting for security prices. Am Econ Rev 98(5):2066–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis N, Huang M, Santos T (2001) Prospect theory and asset prices. Q J Econ 116(1):1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Q J Econ 110(1):73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard C, Ghossoub M (2010) Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory. Math Financ Econ 2(4):277–306

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho LAG, Pires CMP, Dionísio AT, Serrão AJdC (2012) The impact of cap policy in farmer’s behavior—a modeling approach using the cumulative prospect theory. J Policy Model 34(1):81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giorgi E, Hens T (2006) Making prospect theory fit for finance. Financ Mark Portf Manag 20(3):339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazioğlu Ş, Çalışkan N (2011) Cumulative prospect theory challenges traditional expected utility theory. Appl Financ Econ 21(21):1581–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong C, Xu C, Ando M, Xi X (2018) A new method of portfolio optimization under cumulative prospect theory. Tsinghua Sci Technol 23(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich G, Kliger D, Levy O (2009) Decision-making under uncertainty—a field study of cumulative prospect theory. J Bank Finance 33(7):1221–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hens T, Mayer J (2017) Cumulative prospect theory and mean-variance analysis: a rigorous comparison. J Comput Finance 21(3):47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (2018) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Exp Environ Econ 1:143–172

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H, Yamazaki H (1991) Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Manag Sci 37(5):519–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsmeier TJ, Pearson ND (1996) Risk measurement: an introduction to value at risk. In: Working paper vol 6153, pp 1–45

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) The utility of wealth. J Pol Econ 60(2):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirvu TA, Schulze K (2012) Multi-stock portfolio optimization under prospect theory. Math Financ Econ 6(4):337–362

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J Econ Behav Organ 3(4):323–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M (2019) Diminishing marginal utility of wealth cannot explain risk aversion. In: Kahneman Daniel, Tversky Amos (eds) Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar R, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7):1443–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt U, Zank H (2008) Risk aversion in cumulative prospect theory. Manag Sci 54(1):208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1971) Mean-absolute-deviation characteristic lines for securities and portfolios. Manag Sci 18(2):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simo-Kengne BD, Ababio KA, Mba J, Koumba U (2018) Behavioral portfolio selection and optimization: an application to international stocks. Financ Mark Portf Manag 32(3):311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Li H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Huang B (2020) A three-way decision model based on cumulative prospect theory. Inf Sci 519:74–92

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Wei G, Wei C, Wu J (2021) Improved todim method for intuitionistic fuzzy magdm based on cumulative prospect theory and its application on stock investment selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 12(3):891–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely thankful to the referees for their valuable comments. The authors are thankful to Professor Suresh Chandra, Ex-faculty, Department of Mathematics, IIT Delhi, India, for his suggestions on this work. Further, the author, Sweksha Srivastava, is supported by the Indraprastha Research Fellowship for Ph.D. candidates granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi, India vide letter no. GGSIPU/DRC/2019/91/1798.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abha Aggarwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastava, S., Aggarwal, A. & Mehra, A. Portfolio selection by cumulative prospect theory and its comparison with mean-variance model. Granul. Comput. 7, 903–916 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00302-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00302-1

Keywords

Navigation