Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimized pavement structures via multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithm and highway development and management model four (case study: Iran low-volume roads)

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pavement management and optimization tools at the project level provide designers and decision-makers with an optimal and sustainable solution. This research aimed to optimize pavement-designed sections by employing the multi-objective optimization model (MOOM) and the Highway Development and Management Model Four (HDM-4). The study analyzed 14 distinct designs of low-volume road (LVR) asphalt pavement structures across four climate zones, considering five types of subgrades and four types of traffic volume. Based on the analysis results, it is important to note that, although the selected pavements using MOOM and HDM-4 had lower discounted costs compared to the designed pavements (with reductions of 2.41 and 1.54%, respectively), the optimized pavement structures suggested by these two methods were not identical. In other words, in most cases, the analysis indicated that HDM-4 tended to prefer pavement structures with greater bearing capacity, while MOOM often favored structures with lower bearing capacity. Additionally, the discounted costs of the structures optimized using MOOM were 4.58% less than those of the structures optimized using HDM-4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Trejo D (2023) Special issue on adaptive planning for sustainable and resilient infrastructure II: an Introduction. Sustain Resilient Infrastruct 8(5):451–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meneses S, Ferreira A (2013) Pavement maintenance programming considering two objectives: maintenance costs and user costs. Int J Pavement Eng 14(2):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Mansour A, Lee KWW, Al-Qaili AH (2022) Prediction of pavement maintenance performance using an expert system. Appl Sci 12(10):4802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ibrahim EM, El-Badawy SM, Ibrahim MH, Elbeltagi E (2020) A modified pavement condition rating index for flexible pavement evaluation in Egypt. Innov Infrastruct Solut 5:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chundi V, Raju S, Kota SK, Singh KP (2021) Prediction of back-calculated layer moduli using cuckoo search algorithm for pavement asset management at a network level. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jorge D, Ferreira A (2012) Road network pavement maintenance optimisation using the HDM-4 pavement performance prediction models. Int J Pavement Eng 13(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grilli A, Balzi A (2023) Methodologic recommendations to implement pavement management systems and eco-sustainable solutions for local road administrations. Infrastructures 8(2):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Imam R, Murad Y, Asi I, Shatnawi A (2021) Predicting pavement condition index from international roughness index using gene expression programming. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pavement management guide (2012) American association of state highway and transportation officials (AASHTO), 2nd edn. DC, USA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xin J, Akiyama M, Frangopol DM, Zhang M (2022) Multi-objective optimisation of in-service asphalt pavement maintenance schedule considering system reliability estimated via LSTM neural networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng 18(7):1002–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos J, Ferreira A (2012) Pavement design optimization considering costs and preventative interventions. J Transp Eng 138(7):911–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mousa E, El-Badawy S, Azam A (2020) Effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement in granular base layers on predicted pavement performance in Egypt. Innov Infrastruct Solut 5(2):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jawad D, Ozbay K (2006) The discount rate in life cycle cost analysis of transportation projects. 85th Annual TRB Meeting, Washington, DC, USA

  14. Nouh A, El-Dash KM, Basiouny M, El Hadididi OS (2022) Evaluation of buildings structure alternatives using life-cycle cost prediction model. MEJ Mansoura Eng J 47(2):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iran Highway Asphalt Paving Code No. 234 (2011) Vice Presidency for Strategic Planning and Supervision, Tehran, Iran

  16. Lakousha MM (2023) Con-LCCA V1. 0: A computerized tool for analyzing the life cycle cost of construction projects. SVU-Int J Eng Sci Appl 4(1): 62–78

  17. Walls J (1998) Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design: in search of better investment decisions. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Pavement Division

  18. Life-cycle cost analysis primer (2002) U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Asset Management

  19. Mamlouk MS, Zaniewski JP, He W (2000) Analysis and design optimization of flexible pavement. J Transp Eng 126(2):161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall KT, Correa CE, Carpenter SH, Elliott R (2003) Guidelines for life-cycle cost analysis of pavement rehabilitation strategies. 82st Transportation Research Board Annual Conference. Washington, DC, USA

  21. Rouphail NM (1985) Minimum-cost design of flexible pavements. J Transp Eng 111(3):196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hadi MNS, Arfiadi Y (2001) Optimum rigid pavement design by genetic algorithms. Comput Struct 79(17):1617–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferreira A, Santos J (2013) Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level: sensivity analysis to the discount rate. Int J Pavement Eng 14(7):655–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bannour A, El OM, Khadir Lakhal E, Afechkar M, Joubert P (2022) Highway pavement maintenance optimisation using HDM-4: a case study of Morocco’s arterial network. Int J Pavement Eng 23(10):3304–3317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh I, Sreenivasulu P (2005) Prioritisation of road maintenance operations using HDM-4 model-a case study. Indian highways 33(5)

  26. Archondo-Callao R (2008) Applying the HDM-4 model to strategic planning of road works. The World Bank Group. Washington, DC, USA

  27. Onyango M, Sen T, Fomunung I, Owino J, Maxwell J (2015) Evaluation of treatment choice, user cost and fuel consumption of two roadways in Hamilton county Tennessee using HDM-4. Athens J Technol Eng 2(2):89–103

    Google Scholar 

  28. Santos J, Ferreira A (2013) Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level. Int J Pavement Eng 14(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khavandi Khiavi A, Mohammadi H (2018) Multi-objective optimization in pavement management system using NSGA-II method. J Trans Eng, Part B: Pavements 144(2):04018016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Instruction of Temporary and Final Delivery for Road Construction (2006) Ministry of Roads and Transportation Deputy of Education Research and Technology. IRAN

  31. Paterson W, Attoh-Okine B (1992) Summary models of paved road deterioration based on HDM-III. Transportation Research Record (1344)

  32. Rohde GT (1994) Determining pavement structural number from FWD testing. Transportation Research Board (1448)

  33. Bennett CR, Greenwood ID (2003) Modeling road user and environmental effects in HDM (4. Version 3.0. International Study of Highway Development and Management Tools (ISOHDM). World Road Association (PIARC). Cedex, France

  34. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993) American association of state highway and transportation officials (AASHTO). DC, USA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  35. Iranian Ministry of Roads and Urban Development (2018) Iranian Road's Items Price Booklet.

  36. Rejani VU, Janani L, Venkateswaralu K, Sunitha V, Mathew S (2023) Strategic pavement maintenance and rehabilitation analysis of urban road network using HDM-4. Int J Pavement Res Technol 16(4):927–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Blassingame K (2023) True optimization versus prioritization in Pavement Management Systems (PMS). https://learn.assetlifecycle.trimble.com/blog/true-optimization-versus-prioritization-in-pavement-management-systems-pms

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Khavandi Khiavi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest or competing interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khavandi Khiavi, A., Rahimi, F., Mohammadi, H. et al. Optimized pavement structures via multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithm and highway development and management model four (case study: Iran low-volume roads). Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01335-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01335-y

Keywords

Navigation