Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and numerical investigation for the cracking potential of self-compacting concrete (SCC) at early age

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study mainly investigates the cracking index of three different types of concrete (normal, flowing, and self-compacting) due to thermal stresses developed by the heat of hydration in mass concrete block. The hydration heat generated by ten different normal, flowing, and self-compacting concrete mixtures was measured using a semi-adiabatic calorimeter. The cement was replaced by fly ash in varied percentages (20%, 30%, and 40%) to develop normal, flowing, and self-compacting concretes with altering the percentage of fines and the doses of superplasticizer additive. The mechanical (tensile and compressive strength) and thermal properties (thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity and thermal resistivity) of the concrete mixes were measured. Using finite element modeling, the viscoelastic behavior of 2 × 2x2 m concrete block containing 40% fly ash in place of cement was simulated at an early age to predict thermal stresses and cracking indices. The combined experimental and numerical investigations revealed that the three self-compacting concrete mixtures with 20%, 30%, and 40% FA were susceptible to thermal cracking (cracking index > 1). However, the normal concrete with 40% FA has the lowest likelihood of cracking compared to flowing and self-compacting concrete with the same replacement level, due to its lower heat of hydration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fonseca TV, Dos Anjos MAS, Ferreira RLS et al (2022) Evaluation of self-compacting concretes produced with ternary and quaternary blends of different SCM and hydrated-lime. Constr Build Mater 320:126235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kefelegn A, Gebre A (2020) Performance of self-compacting concrete used in congested reinforcement structural element. Eng Struct 214:110665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Silva YF, Delvasto S (2021) Durability of self-compacting concrete with addition of residue of masonry when exposed to carbonation and chlorides mediums. Constr Build Mater 297:123817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh D, Abd-Elssamd A, Ma ZJ, Hun D (2021) Development of high-early-strength fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 266:121051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lv M, An X, Bai H et al (2023) Improved mechanical models for self-compacting concrete in the paste rheological thresholds theory considering the pressure between particles. J Build Eng 64:105656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boukendakdji O, Kadri E-H, Kenai S (2012) Effects of granulated blast furnace slag and superplasticizer type on the fresh properties and compressive strength of self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Compos 34:583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siddique R (2011) Properties of self-compacting concrete containing class F fly ash. Mater Des 32:1501–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faraj RH, Mohammed AA, Omer KM (2022) Self-compacting concrete composites modified with nanoparticles: A comprehensive review, analysis and modeling. J Build Eng 50:104170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Han G, Shen D et al (2022) A new model to predict the optimal mix design of self-compacting concrete considering powder properties and superplasticizer type. J Mater Res Technol 19:3980–3993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shi C, Wu Z, Lv K, Wu L (2015) A review on mixture design methods for self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 84:387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Girish S, Ranganath RV, Vengala J (2010) Influence of powder and paste on flow properties of SCC. Constr Build Mater 24:2481–2488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh N, Kumar P, Goyal P (2019) Reviewing the behaviour of high volume fly ash based self-compacting concrete. J Build Eng 26:100882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan M, Ali M (2019) Improvement in concrete behavior with fly ash, silica-fume and coconut fibres. Constr Build Mater 203:174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen W, Zhang Z, Li J et al (2022) Experimental investigation on the high-volume fly ash ecological self-compacting concrete. J Build Eng 60:105163. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjobe.2022.105163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zanjad N, Pawar S, Nayak C (2022) Use of fly ash cenosphere in the construction Industry: a review. Mater Today Proc 62:2185–2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/jmatpr.2022.03.362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nayak C, Kate G, Thakare S (2021) Optimization of sustainable high-strength–high-volume fly ash concrete with and without steel fiber using Taguchi method and multi-regression analysis. Innov Infrastruct Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00472-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moghaddam F, Sirivivatnanon V, Vessalas K (2019) The effect of fly ash fineness on heat of hydration, microstructure, flow and compressive strength of blended cement pastes. Case Stud Constr Mater 10:e00218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar M, Singh SK, Singh NP (2012) Heat evolution during the hydration of Portland cement in the presence of fly ash, calcium hydroxide and super plasticizer. Thermochim Acta 548:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun J, Kong KH, Lye CQ, Quek ST (2022) Effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag on cement hydration and autogenous healing of concrete. Constr Build Mater 315:125365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ji G, Peng X, Wang S et al (2021) Influence of magnesium slag as a mineral admixture on the performance of concrete. Constr Build Mater 295:123619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang R, He T (2021) Influence of liquid accelerators combined with mineral admixtures on early hydration of cement pastes. Constr Build Mater 295:123659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagaratnam BH, Rahman ME, Mirasa AK et al (2016) Workability and heat of hydration of self-compacting concrete incorporating agro-industrial waste. J Clean Prod 112:882–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xie Y, Du W, Xu Y et al (2023) Temperature field evolution of mass concrete: from hydration dynamics, finite element models to real concrete structure. J Build Eng 65:105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chiniforush AA, Gharehchaei M, Akbar Nezhad A et al (2022) Numerical simulation of risk mitigation strategies for early-age thermal cracking and DEF in concrete. Constr Build Mater 322:126478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smolana A, Klemczak B, Azenha M, Schlicke D (2021) Early age cracking risk in a massive concrete foundation slab: comparison of analytical and numerical prediction models with on- site measurements. Constr Build Mater 301:124135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zreiki J, Bouchelaghem F, Chaouche M (2010) Early-age behaviour of concrete in massive structures, experimentation and modelling. Nucl Eng Des 240:2643–2654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. ASTM C470 / C470M-15 (2015) Standard Specification for Molds for Forming Concrete Test Cylinders Vertically, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org

  28. ASTMC39/C39M-21 (2015) Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.orgorg

  29. ASTM C496 (1996) Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1996 www.astm.orgorg

  30. Orakoglu Firat ME (2021) Experimental study and modelling of the thermal conductivity of frozen sandy soil at different water contents. Measurement 181:109586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. “TEMPOS meter.” (2021) http://publications.metergroup.com/Manuals/20645 TEMPOS_Manual_Web.pdf (accessed Aug. 09, 2021)

  32. Saeed MK, Rahman MK, Baluch MH (2019) Influence of steel and polypropylene fibers on cracking due to heat of hydration in mass concrete structures. Struct Concr. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saeed MK (2013) Experimental Investigation and Modeling the Heat of Hydration in Mass Concrete Structures [PhD dissertation]. King Fahd of Petroleum and minerals University, Saudi Arabia

  34. Sargam Y, Faytarouni M, Riding K et al (2019) Predicting thermal performance of a mass concrete foundation – a field monitoring case study. Case Stud Constr Mater 11:e00289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smolana A, Klemczak B, Azenha M, Schlicke D (2021) Early age cracking risk in a massive concrete foundation slab: comparison of analytical and numerical prediction models with on-site measurements. Constr Build Mater 301:124135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saeed MK, Rahman MK, Alfawzan M et al (2022) Investigating the potential use of date Kernel Ash (DKA) as a partial cement replacement in concrete. Mater Basel Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saha AK (2018) Effect of class F fly ash on the durability properties of concrete. Sustain Environ Res 28:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2017.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chiniforush AA, Gharehchaei M, Akbar Nezhad A et al (2021) Minimising risk of early-age thermal cracking and delayed ettringite formation in concrete – a hybrid numerical simulation and genetic algorithm mix optimisation approach. Constr Build Mater 299:124280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muneer K. Saeed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I declare no conflicts of interest associated with this publication, and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Ethical approval

There are no human subjects in this article.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saeed, M.K. Experimental and numerical investigation for the cracking potential of self-compacting concrete (SCC) at early age. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 8, 120 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01091-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01091-z

Keywords

Navigation