Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental and numerical studies of three-layered unreinforced and geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents both experimental and numerical studies of three-layered reinforced soil slopes consisting of one sandy layer sandwiched between two cohesive–frictional soils. Geosynthetic reinforcements are provided at the interfaces. Small-scale shaking table tests are performed to evaluate different stability parameters like horizontal deformation, root-mean-square acceleration amplification factor, and crest deformation of the slope. Water content, base shaking acceleration, frequencies, and quantity and type of reinforcements are varied to perform the tests. The inclusion of reinforcements increases the strength of the slope enormously which is represented in the paper in terms of different parameters. Geogrid reinforcement is found to be better in comparison with geotextile reinforcement. To verify the results obtained from the present experimental study, a numerical model is developed using PLAXIS 2D and the acceptability of the study is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fellenius W (1936) Calculation of the stability of earth dams. In: Proceedings of the second congress of large dams, Washington, DC, vol 4, pp 445–463

  2. Bishop AW (1955) The use of slip circle in the stability analysis of earth slopes. Geotechnique 5(1):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Janbu N (1954) Applications of composite slip surfaces for stability analysis. In: Proceedings of the stability of earth slopes, Stockholm, Sweden vol 3, pp 43–49

  4. Morgenstern NR, Price VE (1965) The analyses of the stability of general slip surfaces. Geotechnique 15(1):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough RW, Pirtz D (1956) Earthquake resistance of rock-fill dams. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 82(2):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seed HB, Clough RW (1963) Earthquake resistance of sloping core dams. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 89(1):209–242

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hong YS, Chen RH, Wu CS, Chen JR (2005) Shaking table tests and stability analysis of steep nailed slopes. Can Geotech J 42(5):1264–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nova-Roessig L, Sitar N (2006) Centrifuge model studies of the seismic response of reinforced soil slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(3):388–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koga Y, Matsuo O (1990) Shaking table tests of embankment resting on liquefiable sandy ground. Soils Found 30(4):162–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wartman J, Seed RB, Bray JD (2003) Inclined plane studies of the Newmark sliding block procedure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(8):673–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin ML, Wang KL (2006) Seismic slope behavior in a large-scale shaking table model test. Eng Geol 86(2):118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guler E, Enunlu AK (2009) Investigation of dynamic behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining structures under earthquake loads. Bull Earthq Eng 7(3):737–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez A, Holtz RD (2004) Seismic response of reinforced steep soil slopes: results of shaking table study. In: Yegian MK, Kavazanjian E (eds) Geotechnical engineering for transportation projects, vol 126. ASCE GSP, Reston, pp 1664–1672

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin Y, Leng W, Yang G, Li L, Yang J (2015) Seismic response of embankment slopes with different reinforcing measures in shaking table tests. Nat Hazards 76(2):791–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chanda N, Ghosh S, Pal M (2017) Response of Slope Made Up of Soil and Other Waste Materials under Sinusoidal Motion. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2017, Article ID 2456724

  16. Srilatha N, Latha GM, Puttappa CG (2016) Seismic response of soil slopes in shaking table tests: effect of type and quantity of reinforcement. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hazari S, Ghosh S, Sharma RP (2019) Experimental and numerical study of soil slopes at varying water content under dynamic loading condition. Int J Civ Eng 18(2):215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Man-Yu W, Yong L, Ya-Nan D, Bao-Long Y (2020) Probabilistic stability analyses of multi-stage soil slopes by bivariate random fields and finite element methods. Comput Geotech 122:103529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. PLAXIS 2D 8.2 [Computer software]. Delft, Netherlands, Plaxis

  20. IS: 1498 (1970) (reaffirmed 1987), Indian standard classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. BIS, New Delhi

  21. ASTM D4595–11 (2011) Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  22. ASTM D6637–01 (2001) Standard test method for determining tensile properties of geogrids by the single or multi-Rib tensile method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pasternack SC, Gao S (1988) Numerical methods in the stability analysis of slopes. Comput Struct 30(3):573–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsui T, San KC (1992) Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique. Soils Found 32(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Duncan JM (1996) State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite element analysis of slopes. J Geotech Eng 122(7):577–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ugai K, Leshchinsky D (1995) Three-dimensional limit equilibrium and finite element analyses: a comparison of results. Soils Found 35(4):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Griffiths DV, Lane PA (1999) Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Geotechnique 49(3):387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lane P, Griffiths DV (2000) Assessment of stability of slopes under drawdown conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(5):443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2004) Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(5):507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li X (2007) Finite element analysis of slope stability using a nonlinear failure criterion. Comput Geotech 34(3):127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hammouri A, Malkawi AIH, Yamin MMA (2008) Stability analysis of slopes using the finite element method and limit equilibrium approach. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chatterjee D, Krishna AM (2018) Stability analysis of two-layered nonhomogeneous slopes. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.14.65686

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Agartala, Agartala, India

    Kingshuk Jana, Suman Hazari & Sima Ghosh

Authors
  1. Kingshuk Jana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suman Hazari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sima Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sima Ghosh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jana, K., Hazari, S. & Ghosh, S. Experimental and numerical studies of three-layered unreinforced and geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00408-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00408-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation