Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element-based probabilistic stability analysis of rock-fill tailing dam considering regional seismicity

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent tailing dam failure in Brazil has again emphasized the need of performing robust stability analysis prior to construction. This paper demonstrates the probabilistic dynamic stability analysis of tailing dams considering an existing rock-fill tailing dam in India. The stability analysis was performed using 2D finite element-based package RS2. In the probabilistic analysis, the strength parameters such as cohesion (c) and the friction angle (φ) were considered as random variables. In total, 3000 numbers of samples were generated assuming a normal distribution. Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the probability of failure (PoF) and reliability index. Strength reduction method was used for the finite element analyses. A pseudo-static seismic loading was incorporated in the strength reduction analysis to check the seismic stability of the dam. A factor of safety (FoS) of 1.15 was observed from the deterministic analysis for downstream slope. For the same case, the probabilistic analysis provided a mean FoS of 1.19 with 5.46% probability of failure. The FoS values and the locations of the critical failure surface obtained by the limit equilibrium method and finite element method were compared. The observed FoS values were found to be higher than the values specified in the IS 7894-1975 (reaffirmed in 1997) and ANCOLD (1999). In the case of pseudo-static approach, the maximum displacement of 0.53 m was observed in the slope. Furthermore, nonlinear dynamic stability analysis was performed to simulate a true earthquake event. The permanent deformation of the slope after the earthquake was found to be 0.40 m. The zone of failure observed in both pseudo-static and nonlinear dynamic stability analyses was found to be the same. Overall, the results revealed that the spatial variability of the soil significantly influences the FoS values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c :

Cohesion (KPA)

c f :

Factored cohesion (kPa)

CoVs:

Coefficient of variation in normal random variables (dimensionless)

d :

Standard normal deviate (dimensionless)

E :

Young’s modulus (MPa)

E s :

Spatial element size (m)

f max :

Maximum frequency (Hz)

f(s):

Probability density function of normal random variables (dimensionless)

G :

Shear modulus of soil (GPa)

n :

Number of random variables (dimensionless)

Ns :

Number of sample having critical SRF less than or equal to 1 (dimensionless)

N total :

Total number of sample (dimensionless)

PoF:

Probability of failure (%)

R min :

Minimum number of realization (dimensionless)

RI:

Reliability index (dimensionless)

s :

Normal random variable (dimensionless)

SRF:

Strength reduction factor (dimensionless)

Vs :

Shear wave speed (m/s)

\( \alpha_{M} \) :

Rayleigh alpha constant (s − 1)

\( \beta_{K} \) :

Rayleigh beta constant (s)

\( \gamma \) :

Unit weight of soil (kN/m3)

\( \varepsilon \) :

Relative percentage error in estimating probability of failure (%)

\( \zeta_{i} \) :

Damping ratio for mode i (%)

\( \lambda \) :

Wave length associated with the highest frequency component (m)

\( \mu_{s} \) :

Mean of normal random variables (dimensionless)

\( \mu_{{{\text{SRF}} }} \) :

Mean of critical SRF values (dimensionless)

\( \nu \) :

Poisson’s ratio (dimensionless)

\( \rho \) :

Bulk unit weight of soil (kN/m3)

\( \sigma_{n} \) :

Normal stress in soil (kN/m2)

\( \sigma_{s} \) :

Standard deviation of normal random variables (dimensionless)

\( \sigma_{\text{SRF}} \) :

Standard deviation of critical SRF values (dimensionless)

\( \tau_{f} \) :

Shear stress in soil on the sliding surface (kN/m2)

\( \varphi \) :

Friction angle (°)

\( \varphi_{f} \) :

Factored friction angle (°)

\( \omega_{i} \) :

Natural frequency of mode i (rad/s)

References

  1. ICOLD (2001) Tailings dams: risk of dangerous occurrences: lessons learnt from practical experiences. Bulletin (International Commission on Large Dams) p 121

  2. UNEP (1996) Environmental and safety incidents concerning tailings dams at mines: results of a survey for 1980–1996. Mining Journal Research Services & United Nations Environment Programme & United Nations. Department of Humanitarian Affairs, Paris

  3. Rico M, Benito G, Salgueiro AR, Díez-Herrero A, Pereira HG (2008) Reported tailings dam failures. J Hazard Mater 152:846–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. USCOLD Committee on Tailings Dams (1994) Tailings dam incidents. U.S. Committee on Large Dams, Denver

  5. El-Ramly H, Morgenstern NR, Cruden DM (2002) Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. Can Geotech J 39:665–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christian JT, Ladd CC, Baecher GB (1994) Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2180–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chowdhury RN, Xu DW (1995) Geotechnical system reliability of slopes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 47(1995):141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malkawi AIH, Hassan WF, Abdulla FA (2000) Uncertainty and reliability analysis applied to slope stability. Struct Saf 22(2000):161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luzi L, Pergalani F, Terlien MTJ (2000) Slope vulnerability to earthquakes at subregional scale, using probabilistic techniques and geographic information systems. Eng Geol 58(2000):313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhattacharya G, Jana D, Ojha S, Chakraborty S (2003) Direct search for minimum reliability index of earth slopes. Comput Geotech 30(2003):455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao HB (2008) Slope reliability analysis using a support vector machine. Comput Geotech 35(2008):459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kavvadas M, Karlaftis M, Fortsakis P, Stylianidi E (2009) Probabilistic analysis in slope stability. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, pp 1650–1653

  13. Queiroz IM (2016) Comparison between deterministic and probabilistic stability analysis, featuring consequent risk assessment. International Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 10(6):636–643

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sitharam TG, Hegde A (2017b) Probabilistic seismic slope stability analyses of rock fill tailing dams: a case study. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, technical committee, vol 210, pp 2439–2442

  15. Sitharam TG, Hegde A (2019) A case study of probabilistic seismic slope stability analysis of rock fill tailing dam. Int J Geotech Earthq Eng 10(2):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zou JZ, Williams DJ, Xiong WL (1995) Search for critical slip surfaces based on finite element method. Can Geotech J 32(2):233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths DV, Lane PA (1999) Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Geotechnique 48(3):387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng YR, Zhao SY, Kong WX, Deng CJ (2005) Geotechnical engineering limit analysis using finite element method. Rock Soil Mech 26(1):163–168

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griffiths DV, Marquez RM (2007) Three-dimensional slope stability analysis by elasto-plastic finite elements. Ge ´otechnique 57(6):537–546

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baba K, Bahi L, Ouadif L, Akhssas A (2012) Slope stability evaluations by limit equilibrium and finite element methods applied to a railway in the moroccan rif. Open J Civil Eng 2:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma LK, Umrao RK, Singh R, Ahmad M, Singh TN (2017) Stability investigation of hill cut soil slopes along national highway 222 at malshej ghat, maharashtra. J Geol Soc India 89:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zienkiewicz OC, Humpheson C, Lewis RW (1975) Associated and nonassociated visco-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics. Geotechnique 25(4):671–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu B, Low BK (2006) Probabilistic stability analyses of embankments based on finite-element method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1444–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng YM, Lansivaara T, Wei WB (2007) Two-dimensional slope stability analysis by limit equilibrium and strength reduction methods. Comput Geotech 34(2007):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maji VB (2017) An insight into slope stability using strength reduction technique. J Geol Soc India 89:77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sitharam TG, Hegde A (2017) Stability analysis of rock-fill tailing dam: an Indian case study. Int J Geotech Eng 11(4):332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duncan JM (1996) State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes. J Geotech Eng 122(7):577–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IS 1893(I) (1984) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of the structures. Indian Standard, New Delhi

  29. Lumb P (1966) The variability of natural soils. Can Geotech J 3:74–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee IK, White W, Ingles OG (1983) Geotechnical engineering. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hahn GJ, Shapiro SS (1967) Statistical model in engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chok YH (2008) Modelling the effects of soil variability and vegetation on the stability of natural slopes. Doctoral thesis, The University of Adelaide, Australia

  33. IS 7894 (1975) Code of practice for the stability analysis of the earth dams. Indian Standard, New Delhi

  34. ANCOLD (1999) Guidelines on tailings dam design, construction and operation. Australian National Committee on Large Dam

  35. Dell’Avanzi E, Sayão A (1998) Avaliação da probailidade de rupture de taludes”. Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica 11(2):1289–1295

    Google Scholar 

  36. Seed HB (1979) Considerations in the earthquake-resistant design of earth and rockfill dams. In Nineteenth rankine lecture, Geotechnique, vol 29(3), pp 215–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Griffrin MEH, Franklin AG (1984) Rationalizing the seismic coefficient method. Final Report, Miscellaneous Paper GL-84-13. Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg

  38. Kavazanjian EJ, Matasovic N, Hamou TH, Sabatini PJ (1997) Geotechnical engineering circular #3, Design guidance: geotechnical earthquake engineering for highways, vol 1, design principles. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington

  39. Ang AHS, Tang WH (2007) Probability concepts in engineering. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  40. Arya VK, Holden HD (1978) Deconvolution of seismic data—an overview. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron 16(2):95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kuhlemeyer RL, Lysmer J (1973) Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(5):421–427

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nielsen AH (2006) Absorbing boundary conditions for seismic analysis in ABAQUS. ABAQUS Users’ Conference

  43. Çetin M, Mengi Y (2003) Transmitting boundary conditions suitable for analysis of dam reservoir interaction and wave load problems. Appl Math Model 27(2003):451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hegde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hegde, A., Das, T. Finite element-based probabilistic stability analysis of rock-fill tailing dam considering regional seismicity. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 4, 37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0223-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0223-2

Keywords

Navigation