Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of recycled facemask fabrics on the mechanical strength of concrete

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantity of N95 and surgical mask waste is increasing due to COVID-19-related respiratory disease, as millions of people use and throw used masks, primarily in hospitals and now an indispensable part of everyday life. This is the time when we must think about the reuse of these used masks. This paper proposes a method for reusing N95 and surgical masks made with polypropylene fabrics in concrete to enhance the mechanical properties of the concrete. In the proposed method, the fabrics are cut into 20 mm square pieces after disinfection and are directly added to concrete without any additional mechanized methods. The proportions of fabric used were 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 1% by weight of the cement along with the M30 mix. All the mixtures were cured for 180 days and tested at appropriate times. All the strength parameters increased after the addition of 0.5% of the fabric, and further addition of the fabric decreased the strength. There is a 15%, 11% and 7.5% increase in compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength, respectively, at 28 days with 0.5% addition of mask fabric pieces by weight of cement. The results of the mechanical properties, such as compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength, have proven its effective reuse for the production of concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper.

References

  1. Siddique R, Khatib J, Kaur I (2008) Use of recycled plastic in concrete: A review. Waste Manag 28(10):1835–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Idrees M, Akbar A, Mohamed AM, Fathi D, Saeed F (2022) Recycling of waste facial masks as a construction material, a step towards sustainability. Materials 15(5):1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohanty M, Mohanty J, Dey S, Dutta K, Shah MP, Das AP (2023) The face mask: A tale from protection to pollution and demanding sustainable solution. Emerg Contam 100298

  4. Wang Z, An C, Chen X, Lee K, Zhang B, Feng Q (2021) Disposable masks release microplastics to the aqueous environment with exacerbation by natural weathering. J Hazard Mater 417:126036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Małek M, Jackowski M, Łasica W, Kadela M (2020) Characteristics of recycled polypropylene fibers as an addition to concrete fabrication based on portland cement. Materials 13(8):1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qin Y, Zhang X, Chai J, Xu Z, Li S (2019) Experimental study of compressive behavior of polypropylene-fiber-reinforced and polypropylene-fiber-fabric-reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 194:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pakravan H, Jamshidi M, Latifi M, Neshastehriz M (2011) Application of polypropylene nonwoven fabrics for cement composites reinforcement. Asian J Civil Eng 12(5):551–562

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iswarya N (2017) Experimental study on polypropylene reinforced concrete pavement. Int J Latest Eng Res Appl (IJLERA) 02(03):98–102 (ISSN: 2455-7137)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohod MV (2015) Performance of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 12(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-12112836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Selvaraj R, Priyanka R (2015) Study on recycled waste cloth in concrete. Int J Eng Res 4:891–895. https://doi.org/10.17577/ijertv4is090437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rafique N, Abbass W, Abbas S, Ahmed A (2020) Feasibility of textile fabrics for strengthening of concrete column. Constr Build Mater 259:119684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grzymski F, Musiał M, Trapko T (2019) Mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete with recycled fibers. Constr Build Mater 198:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Echeverria CA, Handoko W, Pahlevani F, Sahajwalla V (2019) Cascading use of textile waste for the advancement of fiber reinforced composites for building applications. J Clean Prod 208:1524–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yin S, Tuladhar R, Riella J, Chung D, Collister T, Combe M, Sivakugan S (2016) Comparative evaluation of virgin and recycle polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 114(1):134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Touahri A, Branci T, Yahia A, Ezziane K (2021) Effect of recycled polypropylene fiber on high strength concrete and normal strength concrete properties. Adv Mater Res 10:267–281

    Google Scholar 

  16. Farooq MA, Alomayri T, Ali B, Sultan T, Yosri AM (2023) Influence of hybrid coir-steel fibers on the mechanical behavior of high-performance concrete: Step toward a novel and eco-friendly hybrid-fiber reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 389:131728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Signorini C, Marinelli S, Volpini V, Nobili A, Radi E, Rimini B (2022) Performance of concrete reinforced with synthetic fibers obtained from recycling end-of-life sport pitches. J Build Eng 53:104522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Selvi MT, Dasarathy AK, Ilango SP (2023) Mechanical properties on light weight aggregate concrete using high density polyethylene granules. Materials Today: Proceedings 81:926–930

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rubio-Romero JC, del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira M, Torrecilla-García JA, Calero-Castro S (2020) Disposable masks: Disinfection and sterilization for reuse, and noncertified manufacturing, in the face of shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Saf Sci 129:104830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Indian Standard IS: 4031 (1988) Method of physical test for hydraulic cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  21. Indian Standard IS: 12269 (1987) Specification for 53 grade ordinary portland cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  22. Indian Standard IS: 2386 Part 3 (1963) Methods of testing for aggregates for concrete, Specific Gravity, Density, Absorption and Organic Impurities. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  23. Indian Standard IS: 383 (1987) Specification for coarse and fine aggregate from natural sources for concrete. 8th Reprint October 1991, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  24. Indian Standard IS 456 (2000) Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. 4th Revision, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  25. Indian Standard IS: 10262 (1982) Handbook of concrete mix design. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  26. Indian Standard IS 1199 Part 2 (2018) Fresh Concrete: Methods of Sampling, Testing and Analysis Determination of Consistency of Fresh Concrete (First Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  27. Indian Standard IS: 516 (1959) Methods of test for strength of concrete. Amendment No. 2, Reprint 1993, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  28. Indian Standard IS 13311 part 2 (1992) Non-destructive testing of concrete, methods of test Part 2- Rebound Hammer Test. Reaffirmed (2004), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  29. Akça KR, Çakır Ö, İpek M (2015) Properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete using recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 98:620–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Behnood A, Ghandehari M (2009) Comparison of compressive and splitting tensile strength of high-strength concrete with and without polypropylene fibers heated to high temperatures. Fire Saf J 44(8):1015–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yap SP, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ (2013) Enhancement of mechanical properties in polypropylene–and nylon–fiber reinforced oil palm shell concrete. Mater Des 49:1034–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sadrinejad I, Madandoust R, Ranjbar MM (2018) The mechanical and durability properties of concrete containing hybrid synthetic fibers. Constr Build Mater 178:72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Libre NA, Shekarchi M, Mahoutian M, Soroushian P (2011) Mechanical properties of hybrid fiber reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete made with natural pumice. Constr Build Mater 25(5):2458–2464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Afroughsabet V, Ozbakkaloglu T (2015) Mechanical and durability properties of high-strength concrete containing steel and polypropylene fibers. Constr Build Mater 94:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Song PS, Hwang S, Sheu BC (2005) Strength properties of nylon-and polypropylene-fiber-reinforced concretes. Cem Concr Res 35(8):1546–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khan M, Ali M (2018) Effectiveness of hair and wave polypropylene fibers for concrete roads. Constr Build Mater 166:581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang H, Wang L, Zheng K, Bakura TJ, Totakhil PG (2018) Research on compressive impact dynamic behavior and constitutive model of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 187:584–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shah SP (1991) Do fibers increase the tensile strength of cement-based matrixes? ACI Mater J 88(6):595–602

    Google Scholar 

  39. Saha AS, Amanat KM (2021) Rebound hammer test to predict in situ strength of concrete using recycled concrete aggregates, brick chips and stone chips. Constr Build Mater 268:121088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shariati M, Ramli-Sulong NH, Arabnejad MM, Shafigh P, Sinaei H (2011) Assessing the strength of reinforced concrete structures through Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Schmidt Rebound Hammer tests. Sci Res Essays 6(1):213–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge our parent institution for the valuable support.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Arya R Nair. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Arya R Nair, validated by Dr. Nirmala D B and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arya R. Nair.

Ethics declarations

Funding Information

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other financial support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nair, A.R., Nirmala D B Effect of recycled facemask fabrics on the mechanical strength of concrete. J Build Rehabil 9, 76 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-024-00420-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-024-00420-8

Keywords

Navigation