Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of Seismic Fragility Functions for Typical Iranian Multi-Span RC Bridges with Deficient Cap Beam–Column Joints

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) bridges with multi-column bents are the most common bridges in Iran. There were no special requirements for design of the cap beam–column joints prior to introduction of the seismic codes and thus many existing bridges have poor joint details. Cyclic tests conducted on old multi-column bridge bents have resulted in extensive damage to the joints with little or no damage to the cap beam or columns. In these tests, exterior joints have been damaged more severely than interior joints. The main objective of this research is to develop fragility functions for a typical RC bridge with deficient joint detailing. Nonlinear incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) are performed on finite element model of the bridge to develop the fragility functions at four performance levels. The model for the bridge bent includes nonlinear spring elements with proper characteristics simulating the hysteretic responses of the interior and exterior joints. The parameters defining the hysteretic characteristics of these springs are derived by comparing the analytical and experimental hysteretic responses of the test specimens. The fragility assessment of the bridge is carried out at component level assuming a probabilistic log-normal distribution of the responses. The fragility of the bridge system is generated using Joint Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model (JPSDM). The analytical results indicate the bridge system fragility is highly influenced by the fragility of the exterior and interior joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States. Earthq Spectra 23(3):615–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2008) Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 37(8):1157–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Billah AHMM, Alam MS (2013) Seismic vulnerability assessment of a typical multi-span continuous concrete highway bridge in British Columbia. Can J Civil Eng 48(3)

  4. Zhang J, Huo Y (2009) Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Eng Struct 31(8):1648–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramanathan K, DesRoches R, Padgett JE (2012) A comparison of pre-and post-seismic design considerations in moderate seismic zones through the fragility assessment of multispan bridge classes. Eng Struct 45:559–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tavares DH, Padgett JE, Paultre P (2012) Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in eastern Canada. Eng Struct 40:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Celik OC, Ellingwood BR (2008) Modeling beam-column joints in fragility assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames. J Earthquake Eng 12(3):357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shafaei J, Zareian MS, Hosseini A, Marefat MS (2014) Effects of joint flexibility on lateral response of reinforced concrete frames. Eng Struct 81:412–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bahrani MK, Vasseghi A, Nooralizadeh A, Zargaran M (2017) Experimental and analytical study on the proposed retrofit method for concrete bent in ordinary highway bridges in Iran. J Bridg Eng 22(6):05017004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khanmohammadi M, Abbasloo AA, Valadi E (2016) Enhancing shear strength of capbeam–column joints in existing multicolumn bent bridges using an innovative method. J Bridg Eng 21(12):04016086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B (2004) Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Eng Struct 26(2):187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Avşar Ö, Yakut A, Caner A (2011) Analytical fragility curves for ordinary highway bridges in Turkey. Earthq Spectra 27(4):971–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liao WI, Loh CH (2004) Preliminary study on the fragility curves for highway bridges in Taiwan. J Chin Inst Eng 27(3):367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee SM, Kim TJ, Kang SL (2007) Development of fragility curves for bridges in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 11(3):165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kibboua A, Kehila F, Bechtoula H, Mehani Y, Remki M (2014) Development of fragility curves for seismic evaluation of a reinforced concrete bridge. In Proceedings of the second European conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul

  16. Akbari R (2012) Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete continuous span bridges with irregular configuration. Struct Infrastruct Eng 8(9):873–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alipour A, Shafei B (2012) Performance assessment of highway bridges under earthquake and scour effects. In Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, pp 24–28

  18. Banerjee S, Shinozuka M (2007) Nonlinear static procedure for seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 22(4):293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Frankie TM (2013). Impact of complex system behavior on seismic assessment of RC bridges. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  20. Moschonas IF, Kappos AJ, Panetsos P, Papadopoulos V, Makarios T, Thanopoulos P (2009) Seismic fragility curves for greek bridges: methodology and case studies. Bull Earthq Eng 7(2):439–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Torbol M, Shinozuka M (2012) Effect of the angle of seismic incidence on the fragility curves of bridges. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 41(14):2111–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhong J, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2008) Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges with two-column bents. J Eng Mech 134(6):495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2009) Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion. Struct Saf 31(4):275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 36(6):823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Metwally SE, Chen WF (1988) Moment-rotation modeling of reinforced concrete beam-column connections. Struct J 85(4):384–394

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alath S (1995) Modeling inelastic shear deformation in reinforced concrete beam-column joints. M.S. dissertation, University of Central Florida

  27. Biddah A, Ghobarah A (1999) Modelling of shear deformation and bond slip in reinforced concrete joints. Struct Eng Mech Int J 7(4):413–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Youssef M, Ghobarah A (2001) Modelling of RC beam-column joints and structural walls. J Earthquake Eng 5(01):93–111

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lowes LN, Altoontash A (2003) Modeling reinforced-concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. J Struct Eng 129(12):1686–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Altoontash, A. (2004). Simulation and damage models for performance assessment of reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University

  31. Shin M, LaFave JM (2004) Testing and modeling for cyclic joint shear deformations in RC beam-column connections. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada

  32. Ning CL, Yu B, Li B (2016) Beam-column joint model for nonlinear analysis of non-seismically detailed reinforced concrete frame. J Earthquake Eng 20(3):476–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sengupta P, Li B (2013) Modified Bouc-Wen model for hysteresis behavior of RC beam–column joints with limited transverse reinforcement. Eng Struct 46:392–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hassan, W. M. (2011). Analytical and experimental assessment of seismic vulnerability of beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement in concrete buildings. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Berkeley

  35. Del Gobbo GM, Blakeborough A, Williams MS (2018) Improving total-building seismic performance using linear fluid viscous dampers. Bull Earthq Eng 16(9):4249–4272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Harvey PS Jr, Zéhil GP, Gavin HP (2014) Experimental validation of a simplified model for rolling isolation systems. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 43(7):1067–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li S, Wei B, Tan H, Li C, Zhao X (2020) Equivalence of friction and viscous damping in a spring-friction system with concave friction distribution. J Test Eval 49(1):20190885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Beres A, Pessiki SP, White RN, Gergely P (1996) Implications of experiments on the seismic behavior of gravity load designed RC beam-to-column connections. Earthq Spectra 12(2):185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Walker SG (2001) Seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington

  40. Alire DA (2002) Seismic evaluation of existing unconfined RC beam–column joints. M.S. dissertation, University of Washington

  41. Pantelides CP, Hansen J, Nadauld J, Reaveley LD (2002) Assessment of reinforced concrete building exterior joints with substandard details. PEER report no. 2002/18, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley, USA

  42. Buckle IG, Friedland I, Mander J, Martin G, Nutt R, Power M (2006). Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures. Part 1, bridges (no. FHWA-HRT-06-032). Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center

  43. Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 34(12):1489–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) The open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES) user command-language manual

  45. Park R, Priestley MN, Gill WD (1982) Ductility of square-confined concrete columns. J Struct Div 108(4):929–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Menegotto M (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Proc. of IABSE symposium on resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads, pp 15–22

  47. Wei B, Wang WH, Wang P, Yang TH, Jiang LZ, Wang T (2020) Seismic responses of a high-speed railway (HSR) bridge and track simulation under longitudinal earthquakes. J Earthquake Eng 1–22

  48. Shamsabadi A, Yan L (2008) Closed-form force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment-backfill systems. Proceeding of geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV. Sacramento, USA, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  49. Caltrans SDC (2019) Caltrans seismic design criteria. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento

  50. Choi E (2002) Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  51. Ellingwood B, Hwang H (1985) Probabilistic descriptions of resistance of safety-related structures in nuclear plants. Nucl Eng Des 88(2):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fang JQ, Li QS, Jeary AP, Liu DK (1999) Damping of tall buildings: Its evaluation and probabilistic characteristics. Struct Des Tall Buildings 8(2):145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nielson BG, Mackie KR (2009) Tracking uncertainties from component level to system level fragility analyses through simulation. In: Proc., 10th technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering (TCLEE) int. conf. on structural safety and reliability. ASCE, Reston, VA

  54. Baker JW, Lin T, Shahi SK, Jayaram N (2011) New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program. PEER report 3

  55. Soroushian A (2008) A technique for time integration analysis with steps larger than the excitation steps. Commun Numer Methods Eng 24(12):2087–2111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Soroushian A (2017) Integration step size and its adequate selection in analysis of structural systems against earthquakes. In: Computational methods in earthquake engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 285–328

  57. Soroushian A, Amiri S (2021) Reduction in space for dynamic finite element analysis of assemblies of beam-columns when the mass is available in digitized format. J Appl Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.22055/JACM.2019.31603.1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wei B, Hu Z, He X, Jiang L (2020) Evaluation of optimal ground motion intensity measures and seismic fragility analysis of a multi-pylon cable-stayed bridge with super-high piers in mountainous areas. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 129:105945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng 128(4):526–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), No. 21, Arghavan St., North Dibajee, Farmanieh, P.O. Box 19395-3913, Tehran, Iran

    Arash Taghinia, Akbar Vasseghi & Aram Soroushian

  2. School of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 11155-4563, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Khanmohammadi

Authors
  1. Arash Taghinia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akbar Vasseghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Khanmohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aram Soroushian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akbar Vasseghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taghinia, A., Vasseghi, A., Khanmohammadi, M. et al. Development of Seismic Fragility Functions for Typical Iranian Multi-Span RC Bridges with Deficient Cap Beam–Column Joints. Int J Civ Eng 20, 305–321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00661-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00661-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation