Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Rockfall Hazards Based on the Effect of Rock Size and Shape

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock sizes and shapes influence the trajectories of rockfall. Thus, this study examined the bounce height and runout distance of falling rocks on the basis of different rock sizes, rock shapes, and ground surfaces. A laboratory experiment of rocks with various sizes falling from 35°, 45°, and 60° slope angles and vertically on different ground surfaces was conducted in this study to understand the mechanism of falling rocks. RocFall 5.0 (Rocscience), a 2D rockfall numerical simulation program, was used to perform the probable bounce height and runout distance for various rock shapes on different ground surfaces. The laboratory experiment and a numerical simulation were compared to validate the applicability of laboratory testing in rockfall assessment and calibrate the coefficient of restitution, which is a critical parameter in bouncing blocks. Results indicated that steep slopes and hard ground surfaces cause a high bounce height of falling rocks. Moreover, light rocks bounce higher than heavy rocks, and rocks with round shapes bounce high initially and then roll further away from the falling slope. Therefore, the influence of rock sizes and shapes and impact surface material must not be omitted in investigating rockfall protective measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. Transp Res Board Spec Rep 176:11–33

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bunce CM, Cruden DM, Morgenstern NR (1997) Assessment of the hazard from rock fall on a highway. Can Geotech J 34:344–356. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-34-3-344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen G (2003) Numerical modelling of rock fall using extended DDA. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 22:926–931

    Google Scholar 

  4. Masuya H, Amanuma K, Nishikawa Y, Tsuji T (2009) Basic rockfall simulation with consideration of vegetation and application to protection measure. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 9:1835–1843. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1835-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulkarni T, Choo K (2008) Design and installation of rock fall barriers for the pos slim project, malaysia. In: Geosynthetics in civil and environmental engineering. Springer, Berlin, 857–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69313-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrew R, Hume H, Bartingale R, Rock A, Zhang R (2012) CRSP 3D USERS MANUAL Colorado Rockfall Simulation Program 2:163

  7. Leine RI, Schweizer A, Christen M, Glover J, Bartelt P, Gerber W (2014) Simulation of rockfall trajectories with consideration of rock shape. Multibody Syst Dyn 32:241–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-013-9393-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mineo S, Pappalardo G, Rapisarda F, Cubito A, Maria G, Di (2015) Integrated geostructural, seismic and infrared thermography surveys for the study of an unstable rock slope in the Peloritani Chain (NE Sicily). Eng Geol 195:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yilmaz I, Yildirim M, Keskin I (2008) A method for mapping the spatial distribution of RockFall computer program analyses results using ArcGIS software. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:547–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-008-0174-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong Hoi-chu R, Ho K, Chau K (2000) Shape and mechanical properties of slope material effects on the coefficient of restitution of rockfall study. Proc 4th North Am Rock Mech Symp NARMS 2000. 2000:507–514

  11. Bourrier F, Nicot F, Darve F (2008) Physical processes within a 2D granular layer during an impact. Granul Matter 10:415–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-008-0108-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Agliardi F, Crosta GB (2003) High resolution three-dimensional numerical modelling of rockfalls. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:455–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00021-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crosta GB, Agliardi F, Frattini P, Lari S, Key Issues in Rock Fall Modeling (2015) Hazard and risk assessment for rockfall protection. in: engineering geology for society and territory. Springer Int Publ 2:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guzzetti F, Crosta G, Detti R, Agliardi F (2002) STONE: a computer program for the three-dimensional simulation of rock-falls. Comput Geosci 28:1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00025-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li L, Lan H (2015) Probabilistic modeling of rockfall trajectories: a review. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0718-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaboyedoff M, Labiouse V (2011) Technical note: Preliminary estimation of rockfall runout zones. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:819–828. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-819-2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heidenreich B, Labiouse V (2009) Half-scale experimental studies of rockfall impacts on sandy slopes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1981–1993. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1981-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Evans S, Hungr O (1993) The assessment of rockfall hazard at the base of talus slopes. Can Geotech J 30:620–636. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bourrier F, Dorren L, Nicot F, Berger F, Darve F (2009) Toward objective rockfall trajectory simulation using a stochastic impact model. Geomorphology 110:68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Asteriou P, Saroglou H, Tsiambaos G (2012) Geotechnical and kinematic parameters affecting the coefficients of restitution for rock fall analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 54:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rocscience Coefficient of Restitution Table. https://www.rocscience.com/help/rocfall/baggage/rn_rt_table.htm. Accessed 13 October 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Universiti Sains Malaysia Short Term Grant 304/PAWAM/60313006 and Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University Grant (1001/ PAWAM/ 814192) for the financial assistance to carry out this research. Author express gratitude to USM Fellowship program for providing financial assistance in the form of scholarship. In addition, the authors would also like to express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for the constructive and useful suggestion in improving this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagendran, S.K., Ismail, M.A.M. Analysis of Rockfall Hazards Based on the Effect of Rock Size and Shape. Int J Civ Eng 17, 1919–1929 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00418-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00418-1

Keywords

Navigation