Abstract
This paper aims to suggest analytical bending characteristics models for CFRP hexagon honeycomb panels stiffened with new versatile configurations of rectangular, circular, elliptical, and corrugated cores. Stiffened sandwich panels have broad application to improve bending and torsional stiffness of the automotive, aerospace, and marine body structures and their crashworthiness durability. In this study, analytical bending characteristics and elastic response equations for each introduced stiffened hexagon honeycomb panel were derived when subjected to transverse quasi-static impact loading. These equations are based on the theory of curved laminated beams, the classical lamination method, and the Tsai-Hill failure theory. The employed finite element method (FEM) and the performed digital image correlation low-velocity impact tests demonstrated that the present analytical bending characteristics equations can reasonably predict the elastic behavior of stiffened hexagon honeycomb panels with an accuracy of more than 80%. As a result of quasi-static impact loading, stiffened CFRP hexagon honeycomb panel equipped with corrugated plate cores showed a positive elastic behavior of more than 89% compared to the non-stiffened traditional honeycomb unit. In addition, the effect of corrugation on the Tsai-Hill failure index of corrugated core CFRP honeycombs decreased with layer thickness enhancement because it is more proximate to the same configuration as flat plates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a:
-
Panel length
- b:
-
Panel width
- \({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{ij}}\) :
-
Bending stiffness matrix
- \(\left[ {D_{\left( k \right), \, ij}^{\prime } } \right]\) :
-
The curved beam stiffness matrix
- \(\left[ {D_{\left( k \right), \, ij, \, eq \, , \, panel} } \right]_{i,j = 1,2,6}\) :
-
Panel bending stiffness
- \(\left[ {{\text{D}}_{{\left( {\text{k}} \right){\text{, ij, skin}}}} } \right]_{{\text{i,j = 1,2,6}}}\) :
-
Skin bending stiffness
- \(\left[ {{\text{D}}_{{\left( {\text{k}} \right){\text{, ij, stiff}}}} } \right]_{{\text{i,j = 1,2,6}}}\) :
-
Stiffeners bending stiffness
- \({\text{E}}_{{\text{L}}}\) :
-
Longitudinal Young’s modulus
- \({\text{E}}_{{\text{T}}}\) :
-
Transverse Young’s modulus
- F:
-
Low-velocity impact loading
- \({\text{G}}_{{{\text{LT}}}}\) :
-
Shear modulus
- m:
-
Fourier series counter
- n:
-
Fourier series counter
- N:
-
Number of vertical stiffeners
- \(Q_{\left( k \right),ij}^{{\theta_{k} }}\) :
-
Transformation tensor
- R:
-
Corrugated woven plate wave radius
- \({\text{S}}_{{{12}}}\) :
-
In-plane shear strength
- \(T^{(k)}\) :
-
Tsai-Hill failure index for each laminate of composite plate
- \(T^{\prime (k)}\) :
-
Multi-configuration stiffened honeycomb panels Tsai-Hill failure index
- \(w_{\left( k \right)}\) :
-
Out of plane deflection of each flat laminate
- \(w{^\prime}_{k}\) :
-
Multi-configuration stiffened honeycomb panels out of plane deflection
- X:
-
Longitudinal tensile strength
- x:
-
The longitudinal location from the unit reference point
- \(x_{0}\) :
-
Impact longitudinal location from the unit reference point
- Y:
-
Transverse tensile strength
- y:
-
The lateral location from the unit reference point
- \({y}_{0}\) :
-
Impact lateral location from the unit reference point
- \({\text{Z}}_{{k}}\) :
-
Ply thickness
- \(\upsilon_{{{\text{LT}}}} ,\upsilon_{{{\text{TL}}}}\) :
-
Poisson’s ratios
- \(\theta_{{_{{\text{k}}} }}\) :
-
Ply rotated angle
- \(\mathrm{\alpha }\) :
-
Hexagonal outer angle
- \(\varepsilon_{x}^{k}\) :
-
Flat plate longitudinal strain
- \(\varepsilon_{x}^{\prime k}\) :
-
Multi-configuration stiffened honeycomb panels longitudinal strain
- \({\upvarepsilon }_{{\text{y}}}^{{^{{\text{k}}} }}\) :
-
Flat plate transverse strain
- \(\varepsilon_{y}^{\prime k}\) :
-
Multi-configuration stiffened honeycomb panels transverse strain
- \(\sigma_{x}^{k} ,\sigma_{1}^{k}\) :
-
Flat plate longitudinal stress
- \(\sigma _{x}^{{\prime k}} ,\sigma _{1}^{{\prime k}}\) :
-
Multi-configuration stiffened honeycomb panels longitudinal stress
- \(\sigma_{y}^{k} ,\sigma_{2}^{k}\) :
-
Flat plate transverse stress
- \(\sigma _{1}^{{\prime k}} ,\sigma _{2}^{{\prime k}}\) :
-
Multi-configuration stiffened honeycomb panels transverse stress
- \(\tau_{xy}^{k} ,\tau_{12}^{k}\) :
-
Flat plate shear stress
- \(\tau_{1}^{\prime k} ,\tau_{12}^{\prime k}\) :
-
Multi-configuration stiffened honeycomb panels shear stress
References
Ali M, Israr A, Ahmed A et al (2022) Effect of patch repair on the physical and mechanical properties of carbon bidirectional reinforced composites. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00525-w
Azimpour Shishevan F, Akbulut H (2019) Effects of thermal shock cycling on mechanical and thermal properties of carbon/basalt fiber-reinforced intraply hybrid composites. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 43:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-018-0169-6
Chen SX, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2021a) Size-dependent nonlinear bending behavior of porous FGM quasi-3D microplates with a central cutout based on nonlocal strain gradient isogeometric finite element modelling. Eng Comput 37(2):1657–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01303-z
Chen Y, Ye L, Fu K (2021b) Progressive failure of CFRP tubes reinforced with composite sandwich panels: numerical analysis and energy absorption. Compos Struct 263:113674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113674
Christos K (2010) Design and analysis of composite structures: with application to aerospace structures. Willey, Chichester, UK, pp 300–306
Duodu EA, Gu J, Ding W et al (2018) Comparison of ballistic impact behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy composite and steel metal structures. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 42:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-017-0072-6
Erbayrak E, Yuncuoglu EU, Kahraman Y et al (2021) An experimental and numerical determination on low-velocity impact response of hybrid composite laminate. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 45:665–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-020-00402-4
Farrokhabadi A, Taghizadeh SA, Madadi H, Norouzi H, Ataei A (2020Oct) Experimental and numerical analysis of novel multi-layer sandwich panels under three point bending load. Compos Struct 15(250):112631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112631
Fazel D, Kadivar MH, Zohoor H et al (2021) Failure procedure in epoxy adhesive joining composite plates. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 45:337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-020-00379-0
Ge L, Zheng H, Li H, Liu B, Su H, Fang D (2021) Compression behavior of a novel sandwich structure with bi-directional corrugated core. Thin-Walled Struct 161:107413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107413
Ghanati P, Safaei B (2019Jan) Elastic buckling analysis of polygonal thin sheets under compression. Indian J Phys 93(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-018-1254-9
Gunes R, Arslan K (2016) Development of numerical realistic model for predicting low- velocity impact response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures. J Sandw Struct Mater 18:95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636215603047
Gupta S, Shukla A (2012) Blast performance of marine foam core sandwich composite at extreme temperatures. Exp Mech 52:1521–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9610-8
Gu ZP, Wu XQ, Li QM, Yin QY, Huang CG (2020) Dynamic compressive behavior of sandwich panels with lattice truss core filled by shear thickening fluid. Int J Impact Eng 143:103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103616
Hamidin F, Farrokhabadi A, Ahmadi H (2021) The effect of core shape on the bending response of sandwich panels with filled and unfilled sine and square corrugated cores. J Fail Anal Prev 21(2):537–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-01098-z
Han B, Qin K, Yu B, Wang B, Zhang Q, Lu TJ (2016) Honeycomb–corrugation hybrid as a novel sandwich core for significantly enhanced compressive performance. Mater Des 93:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.158
Hoo Fatt MS, Palla L (2009) Analytical modeling of composite sandwich panels under blast loads. J Sandw Struct Mater 11:357–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636209104515
Hou S, Li T, Jia Z, Wang L (2018) Mechanical properties of sandwich composites with 3d-printed auxetic and non-auxetic lattice cores under low velocity impact. Mater Des 160:1305–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.002
Hyer MW, Scott R (2009) White stress analysis of fiber-reinforced composite materials. DEStech Publications, Lancaster
Jackson M, Shukla A (2011) Performance of sandwich composites subjected to sequential impact and air blast loading. Compos B Eng 42:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.09.005
Li Z, Yang Q, Chen W, Hao H, Matenga C, Huang Z, Fang R (2021) Impact response of a novel sandwich structure with Kirigami modified corrugated core. Int J Impact Eng 156:103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103953
Ma J, Dai H, Chai S, Chen Y (2021) Energy absorption of sandwich structures with a kirigami-inspired pyramid foldcore under quasi-static compression and shear. Mater Des 206:109808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109808
Mei J, Liu J, Huang W (2022) Three-point bending behaviors of the foam-filled CFRP X-core sandwich panel: experimental investigation and analytical modelling. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115206
Nasirzadeh R, Sabet AR (2014) Study of foam density variations in composite sandwich panels under high velocity impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 63:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.08.009
Novak N, Starˇceviˇc L, Vesenjak M, Ren Z (2019) Blast response study of the sandwich composite panels with 3D chiral auxetic core. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.050
Pydah A, Batra RC (2017) Crush dynamics and transient deformations of elastic-plastic Miuraori core sandwich plates. Thin-Walled Struct 115:311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.02.021
Qi J, Li C, Tie Y, Zheng Y, Duan Y (2021) Energy absorption characteristics of origami-inspired honeycomb sandwich structures under low-velocity impact loading. Mater Des 207:109837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109837
Safaei B (2020) The effect of embedding a porous core on the free vibration behavior of laminated composite plates. Steel Compos Struct, Int J 35(5):659–670
Safaei B (2021) Frequency-dependent damped vibrations of multifunctional foam plates sandwiched and integrated by composite faces. Eur Phys J plus 136(6):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01632-4
Safaei B, Fattahi AM, Chu F (2018Jun) Finite element study on elastic transition in platelet reinforced composites. Microsyst Technol 24(6):2663–2671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3651-y
Safaei B, Onyibo EC, Hurdoganoglu D (2022) Effect of static and harmonic loading on the honeycomb sandwich beam by using finite element method. Facta Univ Series Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME220201009S
Sarvestani HY, Akbarzadeh AH, Niknam H, Hermenean K (2018) 3D printed architected polymeric sandwich panels: Energy absorption and structural performance. Compos Struct 200:886–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.002
Shishevan FA, Akbulut H (2019) Low-velocity impact behavior of carbon/basalt fiber- reinforced intra-ply hybrid composites. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 43:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-018-0151-3
Standard ASTM (2008) Standard test method for tensile proprieties of polymer matrix composite materials.ASTM D3039/DM, 3039
Sun Z, Shi S, Guo X, Hu X, Chen H (2016) On compressive properties of composite sandwich structures with grid reinforced honeycomb core. Compos Part B Eng 94:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.054
Taghizadeh SA, Farrokhabadi A, Liaghat G, Pedram E, Malekinejad H, Mohammadi SF, Ahmadi H (2019) Characterization of compressive behavior of PVC foam infilled composite sandwich panels with different corrugated core shapes. Thin-Walled Struct 1(135):160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.11.019
Taghizadeh SA, Naghdinasab M, Madadi H, Farrokhabadi A (2021) Investigation of novel multi- layer sandwich panels under quasi-static indentation loading using experimental and numerical analyses. Thin-Walled Struct 1(160):107326
Tarlochan F, Ramesh S (2012) Composite sandwich structures with nested inserts for energy absorption application. Compos Struct 94:904–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.010
Wang E, Gardner N, Shukla A (2009) The blast resistance of sandwich composites with stepwise graded cores. Int J Solids Struct 46:3492–3502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.06.004
Wang Y, Zhao W, Zhou G, Wang C (2018) Analysis and parametric optimization of a novel sandwich panel with double-V auxetic structure core under air blast loading. Int J Mech Sci 142–143:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.05.001
Wei X, Wu Q, Gao Y, Xiong J (2020) Bending characteristics of all-composite hexagon honeycomb sandwich beams: experimental tests and a three-dimensional failure mechanism map. Mech Mater 148:103401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103401
Yang S, Qi C, Wang D, Gao R, Hu H, Shu J (2013) A Comparative study of ballistic resistance of sandwich panels with aluminum foam and auxetic honeycomb cores. Adv Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/589216
Yang J-S, Zhang W-M, Yang F, Chen S-Y, Schmidt R, Schröder K-U, Ma L, Wu L-Z (2020) Low velocity impact behavior of carbon fibre composite curved corrugated sandwich shells. Compos Struct 238:112027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112027
Yan L, Zhu K, Chen N, Zheng X, Quaresimin M (2021) Energy-absorption characteristics of tube-reinforced absorbent honeycomb sandwich structure. Compos Struct 255:112946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112946
Yuan Y, Zhao X, Zhao Y, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2021) Dynamic stability of nonlocal strain gradient FGM truncated conical microshells integrated with magnetostrictive facesheets resting on a nonlinear viscoelastic foundation. Thin-Walled Struct 1(159):107249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107249
Yu R-P, Wang X, Zhang Q-C, Li L, He S-Y, Han B, Ni C-Y, Zhao, Z.- Y., Lu, T.J. (2020) Effects of sand filling on the dynamic response of corrugated core sandwich beams under foam projectile impact. Compos Part B Eng 197:108135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108135
Zhang G, Wang B, Ma L, Wu L, Pan S, Yang J (2014) Energy absorption and low velocity impact response of polyurethane foam filled pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels. Compos Struct 108:304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.040
Zhang D, Fei Q, Zhang P (2017) Drop-weight impact behavior of honeycomb sandwich panels under a spherical impactor. Compos Struct 168:633–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.053
Zhang C, Tan KT (2020) Low-velocity impact response and compression after impact behavior of tubular composite sandwichstructures. Compos Part B Eng 193:108026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108026
Zhang J, Ye Y, Zhu Y, Yuan H, Qin Q, Wang T (2020) On axial splitting and curling behaviour of circular sandwich metal tubes with metal foam core. Int J Solids Struct 202:111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.06.021
Zhang J, Ye Y, Li J, Zhu Y, Yuan H, Qin Q, Zhao M (2021) Dynamic collapse of circular metal foam core sandwich tubes in splitting and curling mode. Thin-Walled Struct 161:107464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107464
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that the first and second authors are with IUST University. They have no known competing financial interests that could have appeared to influence the results reported in this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shirzadifar, M., Marzbanrad, J. Bending Characteristics of CFRP Hexagon Honeycombs Stiffened with Corrugated Cores under Transverse Quasi-Static Impact Loading. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 47, 779–808 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00550-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00550-9