Skip to main content
Log in

An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of the Rural Revitalization Strategy in Chongqing Municipality, China

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific and effective evaluation is the true embodiment of the implementation effect of the rural revitalization strategy, which can highlight the problems existing in rural revitalization. Constructing a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system is the premise and foundation of evaluation, which ensures the effective implementation of the rural revitalization strategy. This paper synthesized the national rural revitalization strategic plan, Chongqing rural revitalization strategic action plan, and the existing research results. After combination with the Delphi method, a rural revitalization evaluation index system for Chongqing municipality was constructed, which included a total of six first-level indicators, 14 second-level indicators and 36 third-level indicators. The data of the third agricultural census of Chongqing municipality were then used for the empirical research in which the analytic hierarchy process, the entropy weight method and the comprehensive evaluation model were combined to carry out the empirical analysis of Chongqing municipality. The results showed that the overall level of rural revitalization in Chongqing municipality is not high; there are obvious regional differences in Chongqing municipality in the effectiveness of rural revitalization, and the effect of rural revitalization in Chongqing municipality is uneven. Finally, based on the research results, some practical and feasible recommendations are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cai W, He W (2023) Research on comprehensive evaluation of development level of China’s rural revitalization. J Chongqing Univ (Soc Sci Ed) 1:102–116. https://doi.org/10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.pj.2022.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Wang Q, Huang H (2019) Research on the performance evaluation of rural revitalization and development in Fujian Province. Fujian Forum (Hum Soc Sci Ed) 09:182–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Lin Y, Shi H-H (2020) Comprehensive evaluation of the development level of rural revitalization in Yangtze River Delta Region. East China Econ Manag 34(03):16–22. https://doi.org/10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.191218006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Shi H, Lin Y (2021) Research on evaluation system and method of rural revitalization level: a case study of 6 provinces in East China. East China Econ Manag 35(04):91–99. https://doi.org/10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.200914010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du H (2019) Operational guarantee of the policy of benefiting farmers in the process of rural revitalization. People’s Forum 2019(20):94–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Du F (2022) Knowledge graph of rural revitalization research at home and abroad: hotspot evolution, development trends, and international implications. J Southwest Minzu Univ (Hum Soc Sci) 43(04):231–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei L, Zhang G (2018) Analysis Of rural revitalization and regional policy. Henan Soc Sci 26(06):19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan H (2018) The connotation, thinking and policy orientation of rural revitalization strategy. Agric Econ 2018(10):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Z, Li Y, Fan Z, Wang Y (2002) Calculation of high-order average random consistency index (RI) in AHP. Comput Eng Appl 2002(12):45–47+150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Li X, Song Y et al (2023) Data-driven evaluation framework for the effectiveness of rural revitalization in China: an empirical case study of Hubei Province. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:20235–20254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23393-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J (2018) Four paths of rural revitalization. People’s Forum 2018(17):80–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Jiang J (2023) Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of rural revitalization in the Yangtze River economic belt. Stat Decis 39(05):44–49. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2023.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Yang G, Philip M, Hannes L (2017) “Post-rural urbanization” and rural revitalization: exploration of contemporary German rural planning and enlightenment to China. Planning 41(11):111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C (2018) Accurately grasp the connotation and essence of the rural revitalization strategy. Dongyue Lun Cong 39(10):25–33+191

    Google Scholar 

  • Jintao L, Yansui L, Yuanyuan Y, Ning J (2021) County-rural revitalization spatial differences and model optimization in Miyun District of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. J Rural Stud 86:724–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan H, Tu S, Zhang Y, Zhou Z (2018) Countermeasures for the implementation of rural revitalization strategy in China. Macroecon Manag 2018(04):60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T (2017) On the policy background of rural revitalization strategy. Zhongzhou Acad J 2017(12):1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Li X (2023) Evaluation of rural revitalization and development level in the Yangtze River delta region and diagnosis of obstacle factors. Stat Decis 2023(06):77–81. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2023.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Li S, Ping J (2021) Evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural revitalization in Qinghai Province based on improved entropy TOPSIS gray correlation model. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan 42(12):115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y et al (2022) Evaluation of the effectiveness of rural revitalization and an improvement path: a typical old revolutionary cultural area as an example. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lu F, Deng G (2022) Dynamic comparison and regional differences of rural revitalization levels in China’s Provinces. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan 43(10):199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu F, Pang Z, Deng G (2022a) Measurement and formation mechanism of regional differences in rural revitalization in China. Inq Econ Issues 2022(04):19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu F, Pang Z, Deng G (2022b) Measurement on rural revitalization level and its spatial correlation effect: a case study of Gansu Province. Stat Decis 38(23):63–68. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.23.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv C, Cui Y (2021) Rural vitalization and development: evaluation index system, regional disparity and spatial polarization. Issues Agric Econ 2021(05):20–32. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2021.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao J, Wang L (2020) Construction of an evaluation index system for rural revitalization: an empirical study at the provincial level. Stat Decis 36(19):181–184. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2020.19.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu C (2019) Foreign rural revitalization experience and its enlightenment to the implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy: taking South Korea and Japan in Asia as examples. J Tianjin Adm Inst 21(01):81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Song L, Bai Y (2022) Construction of evaluation index system and regional difference decomposition of rural revitalization level. Stat Decis 38(24):17–21. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.24.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhu Y, Yu M (2022) Measuring the implementation effects of rural revitalization in China’s Jiangsu Province: under the analytical framework of “deconstruction, assessment and brainstorming.” Growth Change 53(3):1146–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei H (2022) China’s rural development in the 14th five-year plan period. China Econ 17(1):2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu R (2023) Measurement of provincial rural revitalization and development level and analysis of spatial agglomeration characteristics. Stat Decis 39(04):59–64. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2023.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J (2019) “Three rural areas” are strong and rich: the practice of rural revitalization in the United States and its experience for reference. World Agric 2019(05):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Wang Y (2022) Measurement, regional difference and dynamic evolution of rural revitalization level in China. J Quant Technol Econ 39(05):64–83. https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2022.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue L, Cao Z, Yang C (2022) Regional differences and dynamic evolution of rural revitalization evaluation in China. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan 43(09):240–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Xueqi L, Zhengjia L, Huimin Z, Yuqing J, Linna S (2021) Multi-dimension evaluation of rural development degree and its uncertainties: a comparison analysis based on three different weighting assignment methods. Ecol Indic 130:108096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X (2016) Breakthroughs at the level of values in rural revitalization in Japan: taking the Noto Satoyama and Caspian Sea area as an example. Int Urban Plan 31(05):115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y (2018) The choice of China’s rural revitalization from the perspective of urban-rural integration. Discus Mod Econ 2018(06):101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Zheng X, Wu Z, Qian T, Zhao J (2019) Research on the development characteristics of urban agricultural areas and countermeasures to realize rural revitalization. Agric Mod Res 40(02):181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang A-W, Li X, Ye X-F (2021) Construction of the index system and evaluation of rural revitalization in Tibet. J Tibet Univ 36(03):185–193. https://doi.org/10.16249/j.cnki.1005-5738.2021.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Liao H, Liu L, Zhu L, Li D, Cai Z (2022) Study on the evaluation and path of rural revitalization in Chongqing. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 44(05):13–22. https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2022.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi X, Chen Y, Xiang Y, Wang H (2020) Construction and evaluation of index system for county rural revitalization—the case of Deqing County of Guangdong Province. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan 41(08):187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinan X, Ting W, Wenjing L, Ruofeng Z, Yimin H, Wangsheng G, Yuanquan C (2023) Rural system sustainability evaluation based on emergy analysis: an empirical study of 321 villages in China. J Clean Prod 389:136088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Bai Y (2022) Research on regional difference, distribution dynamic evolution and spatial correlation of China’s rural revitalization level. J Quant Technol Econ 39(02):84–102. https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2022.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li S (2022) Construction of evaluation index system for rural revitalization in China under the goal of common prosperity. Gansu Soc Sci 2022(05):25–34. https://doi.org/10.15891/j.cnki.cn62-1093/c.2022.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Li M, Xu Y (2018) Construction and empirical study of rural revitalization evaluation index system. Manag World 34(08):99–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang X, Jiang N (2022) Study on the difference in rural vitalization level and spatial structure in western Heilongjiang Province. J Agrotech Econ 2022(09):134–144. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2022.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Kong M, Hu G, Zhang T (2023) Research review on the comprehensive evaluation system of rural revitalization development level. Stat Decis 07:39–45. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2023.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y (2018) The scientific connotation and realization path of implementing rural revitalization strategy. J Xinjiang Norm Univ (philos Soc Sci Ed) 39(05):71–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q (2018) Analysis of current obstacles to rural revitalization and countermeasures. People’s Forum Acad Front 2018(03):19–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the Chongqing Social Science Planning Project (2019QNGL32), Chongqing's Educational Science Planning Key Issues with Funding (2018-GX-022), Chongqing Municipal Education Commission Science and Technology Research Project (KJQN202000847), and Chongqing Technology and Business University Scientific Research Platform Open Project (KFJJ2018115).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youbo Wu.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, Y., Wu, Y. An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of the Rural Revitalization Strategy in Chongqing Municipality, China. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 48, 561–576 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01132-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01132-8

Keywords

Navigation