Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Soil–Structure Interaction on Seismic Fragility of Railway Concrete Bridge, in India

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a comparative case study about seismic fragility surfaces of a railway-bridge pier considering with and without soil–structure interaction effect. The probability of exceedance of damage by the piers is the primary concern of this study's fragility analysis. Lateral stiffness and horizontal stiffness are calculated layer-wise based on the soil profile. The study also focused on single parameters such as pier tip, base absolute maximum displacement, and spectral acceleration. Considering the bridge selected, a modal analysis was performed through nonlinear time-history analysis with a set of scaled real recorded ground motions data applicable for the study location to capture the actual characteristics of motion that may be experienced by the structure. Empirical relationships were established between pier tip, base displacement, and rotation with spectral acceleration by the multiple linear regression method. The first case showed the effect of soil overpowers the fragility curves. Fragility surfaces were generated for the second case, considering both without and with soil–structure interaction effect. The result shows that the soil–structure interaction effect reduces the probability of damage and the effect depends on soil type. However, the variation is marginal in soft soil. The pier tip and base rotation become a decisive guiding factor for without soil effect; however, rotation effects become more while considering soil effect, but the pier tip and base displacement show opposite results. However, the soil provides more stiffness and stability to the structure to resist seismic forces. The study could be enhanced if the soil properties are altered and the analysis performed for higher magnitude seismic excitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

source: Google Earth)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashford SA, Juirnarongrit T (2003) Evaluation of pile diameter effect on initial modulus of subgrade reaction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129(3):234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardet JP, Ichii K, Lin CH (2000) EERA, a computer program for equivalent linear earthquake site response analysis of layered soils deposits. University of Southern California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury I, Tarafdar R, Ghosh A, Dasgupta SP (2017) Dynamic soil structure interaction of bridge piers supported on well foundation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhan S, Dicleli M (2014) Effect of dynamic soil–bridge interaction modeling assumptions on the calculated seismic response of integral bridges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Wu Y, Guo Y (2016) Time-dependent seismic fragility analysis of bridge systems under scour hazard and earthquake loads. Eng Struct 121:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 2911 (Part 1/Sec 2):2010 (2010) Design and construction of pile foundations—code of practice, part 1 concrete piles, section 2 bored cast in-situ concrete piles. Bureau of Indian Standards

  • Kausel E (2010) Early history of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:822–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy R, Cornell C, Campbell R, Kaplan S, Perla H (1980) Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant. Nuclear Eng Des 59:315–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosleh A, Razzaghi MS, Jara J, Varum H (2016) Seismic fragility analysis of typical pre-1990 bridges due to near and far-field ground motions. Int J Adv Struct Eng 8:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenderga LJ, Gavin K (2016) A comparison of initial stiffness formulations for small-strain soil–pile dynamic Winkler modelling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 81:27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmani A, Taiebat M, Finn WL, Ventura CE (2016) Evaluation of substructuring method for seismic soil–structure interaction analysis of bridges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:112–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduliand damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. EERC 70-10, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Seed HB, Sun JH (1989) Implication of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of September 19, 1985, for earthquake-resistance-design criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. Report No. UCB/EERC-89/03, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Sil A, Haloi J (2017) Empirical correlations with standard penetration test (SPT)-N for estimating shear wave velocity applicable to any region. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 3:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani F, Mangalathu S, DesRoches R (2017) A comparative analytical study on the fragility assessment of box-girder bridges with various column shapes. Eng Struct 153:460–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanidou SP, Sextos AG, Kotsoglou AN, Lesgidis N, Kappos AJ (2017) Soil–structure interaction effects in analysis of seismic fragility of bridges using an intensity-based ground motion selection procedure. Eng Struct 151:366–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares DH, Padgett JE, Paultre P (2012) Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in eastern Canada. Eng Struct 40:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongaonkar NP, Jangid RS (2003) Seismic response of isolated bridges with soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesic AS (2016) Analysis of ultimate loads of shallowfoundations. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(SMI):45–73

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. P. Naveen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S., Sil, A. & Naveen, B.P. Effects of Soil–Structure Interaction on Seismic Fragility of Railway Concrete Bridge, in India. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 47, 353–372 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00899-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00899-6

Keywords

Navigation