Abstract
This paper is a comparative case study about seismic fragility surfaces of a railway-bridge pier considering with and without soil–structure interaction effect. The probability of exceedance of damage by the piers is the primary concern of this study's fragility analysis. Lateral stiffness and horizontal stiffness are calculated layer-wise based on the soil profile. The study also focused on single parameters such as pier tip, base absolute maximum displacement, and spectral acceleration. Considering the bridge selected, a modal analysis was performed through nonlinear time-history analysis with a set of scaled real recorded ground motions data applicable for the study location to capture the actual characteristics of motion that may be experienced by the structure. Empirical relationships were established between pier tip, base displacement, and rotation with spectral acceleration by the multiple linear regression method. The first case showed the effect of soil overpowers the fragility curves. Fragility surfaces were generated for the second case, considering both without and with soil–structure interaction effect. The result shows that the soil–structure interaction effect reduces the probability of damage and the effect depends on soil type. However, the variation is marginal in soft soil. The pier tip and base rotation become a decisive guiding factor for without soil effect; however, rotation effects become more while considering soil effect, but the pier tip and base displacement show opposite results. However, the soil provides more stiffness and stability to the structure to resist seismic forces. The study could be enhanced if the soil properties are altered and the analysis performed for higher magnitude seismic excitations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashford SA, Juirnarongrit T (2003) Evaluation of pile diameter effect on initial modulus of subgrade reaction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129(3):234–242
Bardet JP, Ichii K, Lin CH (2000) EERA, a computer program for equivalent linear earthquake site response analysis of layered soils deposits. University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Chowdhury I, Tarafdar R, Ghosh A, Dasgupta SP (2017) Dynamic soil structure interaction of bridge piers supported on well foundation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:251–265
Erhan S, Dicleli M (2014) Effect of dynamic soil–bridge interaction modeling assumptions on the calculated seismic response of integral bridges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:42–55
Guo X, Wu Y, Guo Y (2016) Time-dependent seismic fragility analysis of bridge systems under scour hazard and earthquake loads. Eng Struct 121:52–60
IS 2911 (Part 1/Sec 2):2010 (2010) Design and construction of pile foundations—code of practice, part 1 concrete piles, section 2 bored cast in-situ concrete piles. Bureau of Indian Standards
Kausel E (2010) Early history of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:822–832
Kennedy R, Cornell C, Campbell R, Kaplan S, Perla H (1980) Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant. Nuclear Eng Des 59:315–338
Mosleh A, Razzaghi MS, Jara J, Varum H (2016) Seismic fragility analysis of typical pre-1990 bridges due to near and far-field ground motions. Int J Adv Struct Eng 8:1–9
Prenderga LJ, Gavin K (2016) A comparison of initial stiffness formulations for small-strain soil–pile dynamic Winkler modelling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 81:27–41
Rahmani A, Taiebat M, Finn WL, Ventura CE (2016) Evaluation of substructuring method for seismic soil–structure interaction analysis of bridges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:112–127
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduliand damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. EERC 70-10, University of California, Berkeley, California
Seed HB, Sun JH (1989) Implication of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of September 19, 1985, for earthquake-resistance-design criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. Report No. UCB/EERC-89/03, University of California, Berkeley, California
Sil A, Haloi J (2017) Empirical correlations with standard penetration test (SPT)-N for estimating shear wave velocity applicable to any region. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 3:22
Soleimani F, Mangalathu S, DesRoches R (2017) A comparative analytical study on the fragility assessment of box-girder bridges with various column shapes. Eng Struct 153:460–478
Stefanidou SP, Sextos AG, Kotsoglou AN, Lesgidis N, Kappos AJ (2017) Soil–structure interaction effects in analysis of seismic fragility of bridges using an intensity-based ground motion selection procedure. Eng Struct 151:366–380
Tavares DH, Padgett JE, Paultre P (2012) Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in eastern Canada. Eng Struct 40:107–118
Tongaonkar NP, Jangid RS (2003) Seismic response of isolated bridges with soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23:287–302
Vesic AS (2016) Analysis of ultimate loads of shallowfoundations. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(SMI):45–73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, S., Sil, A. & Naveen, B.P. Effects of Soil–Structure Interaction on Seismic Fragility of Railway Concrete Bridge, in India. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 47, 353–372 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00899-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00899-6