Abstract
This paper proposes a numerical 3D flow pattern at the 90° equal-width open-channel junction. The Reynolds stress turbulent model (RSM) is applied to simulate the turbulent flow which is analyzed as a one-phase steady state. The Shumate’s experimental findings are used to test the validity of developed numerical model. Comparison of the simulation results and the experimental data has indicated a close proximity between the flow patterns of the two sets. The average prediction error also showed a range between 3.5 and 10%. Effects of the discharge ratio on the separation zone characteristics have illustrated an inverse relation, where an increase in discharge ratio will entail a decrease in the length and width of the separation zone. The shape index of separation zone has an average value 0.18. Comparison analysis further revealed that the increase in the discharge ratio will lead to a decrease in the maximum value of the bed shear stress. In addition, it clearly provides a powerful numerical model for the flow pattern analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \( u_{i} \) :
-
Velocity components in Cartesian coordinates (u, v, w)
- \( u \) :
-
Cartesian velocity in x direction
- \( v \) :
-
Cartesian velocity in y direction
- \( w \) :
-
Cartesian velocity in z direction
- \( U_{0} \) :
-
Average velocity at downstream end of the main channel
- \( {\rm P} \) :
-
Total pressure
- \( \rho \) :
-
Water density
- \( g_{i} \) :
-
Gravity acceleration in Cartesian coordinate
- \( \tau_{ij} \) :
-
Stress tensor
- \( H_{0} \) :
-
Water depth at downstream end of the main channel
- \( W \) :
-
Channel width
- \( H_{r} \) :
-
Width of separation zone
- \( L_{r} \) :
-
Length of separation zone
- \( Q \) :
-
Total discharge
- \( q^{*} \) :
-
Ratio of the main channel to total discharge
- \( \nu \) :
-
Kinematic viscosity
References
Best JL, Reid I (1984) Separation zone at open-channel junction. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 100:1588–1594
Biron PM, Ramamurthy AS, Han S (2004) Three dimensional numerical modeling of mixing at river confluences. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 130:168–280
Borqaee S, Nazari A (2003) Experimental investigation of sedimentation at channel junction. In: Proceeding 6th international conference of civil engineering, Esfahan, Iran, pp 247–255
Boyer C, Roy AG, Best JL (2006) Dynamics of a river channel confluence with discordant beds: flow turbulence, bed load, sediment transport, and bed morphology. J Geophys Res Earth 111:1–22
Czernuszenko W, Rylov A (2002) Modeling of three-dimensional velocity field in open channel flows. J Hydraul Res 40:135–143
Daly BJ, Harlow FH (1970) Transport equations in turbulence. Phys Fluids 13:2634–2649
Ghobadian R (2006) Investigation of flow, scouring and sedimentation at river-channel confluences. Ph.D. thesis, University of Shahid Chamran, Ahwaz, Iran
Ghobadian R, Shafaee-Bejestan M, Musavi-Jahromi SH (2006) Experimental investigation of flow separation zone at river confluences for Subcritical flow conditions. J Iran Resour Res 2:67–77
Goudarzizadeh R, Musavi-Jahromi SH, Hedayat N (2010) Simulation of 3D flow using numerical model at open-channel confluences. In: Proceedings of word academy of science engineering and technology, Venice, Italy, pp 1465–1470
Goudarzizadeh R, Musavi-Jahromi SH, Hedayat N and Naghshineh MH (2011) Numerical investigation of the flow separation zone and quality of the bed shear stress distribution at open-channel confluences. In: Proceedings of word academy of science engineering and technology, Dubai, UAE, pp 1231–1235
Gurram SK, Karki KS, Hager WH (1997) Subcritical junction flow. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 123:447–455
Hager WH (1989) Transition flow in channel junctions. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 115:243–259
Hsu CC, Wu FS, Lee WJ (1998) Flow at 90 equal-width open-channel junction. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 124:186–191
Karami H et al (2017) Simulation of flow pattern at rectangular lateral intake with different dike and submerged vane scenarios. Water Sci Eng 10(3):246–255
Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289
Launder BL, Reece GJ, Rodi W (1975) Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech 68:537–566
Lien FS, Leschziner MA (1994) Assessment of turbulent transport models including non-linear RNG Eddy-viscosity formulation and second-moment closure. Comput Fluids 23(8):983–1004
Ramamurthy AS, Qu JY, Zhai C (2006) 3D simulation of combining flows in 90° rectangular closed conduits. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 132:214–218
Schindfessel L, Creëlle S, De Mulder T (2015) Flow patterns in an open channel confluence with increasingly dominant tributary inflow. Water 2015(7):4724–4751. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7094724
Schindfessel L, Creëlle S, De Mulder T (2017) How different cross-sectional shapes influence the separation zone of an open-channel confluence. J Hydraul Eng 143(9):04017036
Shabayek S, Steffler P, Hicks F (2002) Dynamic model for Subcritical combining flows in channel junctions. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 128:821–828
Shumate ED (1998) Experimental description of flow at an open-channel junction. Master thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa
Taylor EH (1944) Flow characteristics at rectangular open-channel junction. J Hydraul Eng, ASCE 109:893–912
Wang LY, Wu YX, Zheng ZC (2008) Oil-water two-dimensional flow inside T-junction. J Hydrodyn 20:147–153
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goudarzizadeh, R., Musavi-Jahromi, S.H. Experiment-Based CFD Simulation of Flow Pattern at Open-Channel Junctions. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44 (Suppl 1), 427–436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00341-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00341-4