Abstract
The fracture properties of an asphalt mixture specimen can be different due to variation in raw material characteristic, mixture design, method of the mixture production, and environmental conditions. This paper summarized the fracture properties of the semicircular specimens analyzed using different methods. Loose asphalt mixtures from two asphalt mixing plants were collected and used for the sample preparation. Each mixture was unique with respect to variation in terms of binder type, binder content, aggregate gradation, filler type, and the types of asphalt mixing plants (drum or batch plant) which were used for the production of particular mixtures. The samples were tested using semicircular bending test, and compared in terms of maximum force, deformation at maximum force, stiffness, strain at maximum force, maximum stress at failure, fracture toughness, and fracture energy. The results indicated that samples produced using stiffer binders exhibited a higher resistance to fracture while consuming less energy to reach failure compared to those prepared using softer binder. In addition, this study proposed three indicators, including the velocity of fracture initiation (υFI), velocity of crack growth (υCG), and fragility index (FI) to gain a better understanding of the fracture behavior of asphalt mixtures with respect to the mixtures’ crack resistance and its propagation. The results of υFI and υCG were highly dependent on mixtures brittleness, while FI exhibited an acceptable capability to differentiate mixtures crack potential regardless of their inherent characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO TP105-13 (2013) Standard method of test for determining the fracture energy of asphalt mixtures using the semicircular bend geometry (SCB). American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials
Biligiri KP, Said SH (2014) Prediction of the remaining fatigue life of flexible pavements using laboratory and field correlations. J Mater Civ Eng 27(7):04014201
BS EN 12697-44:2010 (2010) Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Crack propagation by semi-circular bending test
Cong L, Peng J, Guo Z, Wang Q (2015) Evaluation of fatigue cracking in asphalt mixtures based on surface energy. J Mater Civ Eng 29(3):D4015003
Hamzah MO, Omranian SR, Golchin B (2015) A review on the effects of aging on properties of asphalt binders and mixtures. Casp J Appl Sci Res 4(6):15–34
Huang B, Shu X, Zuo G (2005) Laboratory evaluation of semi-circular bending tensile strength test for HMA mixtures. In: 84th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC, USA (No. 05-0130)
Huang L, Cao K, Zeng M (2009) Evaluation of semicircular bending test for determining tensile strength and stiffness modulus of asphalt mixtures. J Test Eval 37(2):1–7
Li X, Marasteanu MO (2006) Investigation of low temperature cracking in asphalt mixtures by acoustic emission. Road Mater Pavement Des 7(4):491–512
Malaysian Public Works Department (PWD) (2008) Standard specification for road works, section 4, flexible pavement. Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur
Mohammad LN, Wu Z, Aglan MA (2004) Characterization of fracture and fatigue resistance on recycled polymer-modified asphalt pavements. In: Proceedings, 5th international conference, pp 375–382
Mohammad LN, Kim M, Elseifi M (2012) Characterization of asphalt mixture’s fracture resistance using the semi-circular bending (SCB) test. In: 7th RILEM international conference on cracking in pavements. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–10
Molenaar JMM, Molenaar AAA (2000) Fracture toughness of asphalt in the semi-circular bend test. In: Proceedings of the papers submitted for review at 2nd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume congress, held 20–22 September 2000, Barcelona, Spain (book 1-session 1)
Nsengiyumva G, You T, Kim YR, Beran M (2016) Investigation of testing variables of semicircular bending test for asphalt concrete mixtures: experimental-statistical approach. In: Transportation research board 95th annual meeting (No. 16-4540)
Omranian SR, Hamzah MO, Valentin J, Hasan MRM (2018) Determination of optimal mix from the standpoint of short term aging based on asphalt mixture fracture properties using response surface method. Constr Build Mater 179:35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.078
Ozer H, Al-Qadi IL, Lambros J, El-Khatib A, Singhvi P, Doll B (2016) Development of the fracture-based flexibility index for asphalt concrete cracking potential using modified semi-circle bending test parameters. Constr Build Mater 115:390–401
Saha G, Biligiri KP (2015) Fracture damage evaluation of asphalt mixtures using semi-circular bending test based on fracture energy approach. Eng Fract Mech 142:154–169
Saha G, Biligiri KP (2016) Fracture properties of asphalt mixtures using semi-circular bending test: a state-of-the-art review and future research. Constr Build Mater 105:103–112
Tang S (2014) Evaluate the fracture and fatigue resistances of hot mix asphalt containing high percentage reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) materials at low and intermediate temperatures. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University
Yin A, Yang X, Zeng G, Gao H (2014) Fracture simulation of pre-cracked heterogeneous asphalt mixture beam with movable three-point bending load. Constr Build Mater 65:232–242
Acknowledgements
This research study is based in part upon the work supported by the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education through the Exploratory Research Grant Scheme (ERGS) under Grant Number 203/PAWAM/6730111. Many thanks are also due to technicians of the Highway Engineering Laboratory at Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Omranian, S.R., Hamzah, M.O. & Hasan, M.R.M. Introducing New Indicators to Evaluate Fracture Properties of Asphalt Mixtures Using Semicircular Bending Test. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 43, 541–549 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0205-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0205-1