Skip to main content
Log in

Mitigating the Effect of Incomplete Measurement in Sensitivity-Based FE Model Updating by Enhanced Transfer Function

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite-element method is widely used for estimation of the structural behavior at various states. The finite-element (FE) models are not, however, a perfect representation of the real-life structures. In order to find a perfect FE model of the structure as well as monitoring of structural parameter changes, the FE model must be updated to match with real-life model. The curse of incomplete measurement is a major challenge for an updating method, especially in frequency domain. This paper proposes and investigates the replacement of the unmeasured degrees of freedom (DOFs) by experimentally enhanced decomposed transfer function (EDTF), in a FRF-based sensitivity equation to mitigate the adverse effects of data incompleteness. The enhanced transfer function is reached by a truncated set of experimentally measured natural frequencies and damping loss factors of real model. To highlight the merits of the EDTF in mitigating the effect of incomplete measurement, it is compared with the dynamic expansion of measured mode shapes. The results of the numerical investigations show that proposed approach is more efficient than dynamic expansion in the presence of high measurement error, large damages (parameter changes) and fewer measured DOFs. Besides, EDTF eliminates the need for modal data measurement up to a frequency much higher than the highest excitation frequency, which is necessary in dynamic expansion method. In this study, linear least-square method bounded with impartial side constraints is used for solving the sensitivity-based error minimization problem needed for model updating. Furthermore, fifty sets of numerically simulated error-contaminated FRF data are adopted to conduct Monte-Carlo analysis of the robustness of model updating results against error. The mean and coefficient of variation of estimated parameters are utilized for results indication and illustration purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alamdari MM, Li J, Samali B (2014) FRF-based damage localization method with noise suppression approach. J Sound Vib 333(14):3305–3320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvandi A, Cremona C (2006) Assessment of vibration-based damage identification techniques. J Sound Vib 292(1):179–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownjohn JM, Xia P-Q, Hao H, Xia Y (2001) Civil structure condition assessment by FE model updating: methodology and case studies. Finite Elem Anal Des 37(10):761–775

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD (2007) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebling SW (1996) Damage detection and model refinement using elemental stiffness perturbations with constrained connectivity. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures forum

  • Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos JA, Soares CM, Soares CM, Maia N (2003) Structural damage identification: influence of model incompleteness and errors. Compos Struct 62(3):303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entezami A, Shariatmadar H (2015) New sensitivity-based methods for structural damage diagnosis by least square minimal residual techniques. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 39(C2):231

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfandiari A, Bakhtiari-Nejad F, Rahai A, Sanayei M (2009) Structural model updating using frequency response function and quasi-linear sensitivity equation. J Sound Vib 326(3):557–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfandiari A, Rahai A, Sanayei M, Bakhtiari-Nejad F (2016) Model updating of a concrete beam with extensive distributed damage using experimental frequency response function. J Bridge Eng 21(4):04015081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faverjon B, Sinou J-J (2008) Robust damage assessment of multiple cracks based on the frequency response function and the constitutive relation error updating method. J Sound Vib 312(4):821–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gang X, Chai S, Allemang RJ, Li L (2014) A new iterative model updating method using incomplete frequency response function data. J Sound Vib 333(9):2443–2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görl E, Link M (2003) Damage identification using changes of eigenfrequencies and mode shapes. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(1):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafe H (1999) Model updating of large structural dynamics models using measured response functions. University of London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Xu Y, Li J, Su Z, Liu H (2012) Structural damage detection of controlled building structures using frequency response functions. J Sound Vib 331(15):3476–3492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaishi B, Ren W-X (2006) Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual. J Sound Vib 290(1):369–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HM, Bartkowicz TJ (1993) Damage detection and health monitoring of large space structures. Sound Vib 27:12

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Hao H (2016) Substructural interface force identification with limited vibration measurements. J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(3):395–410

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Law S (2012) Substructural damage detection with incomplete information of the structure. J Appl Mech 79(4):041003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Hu Y, Wang X (2013) Numerical methods for evaluating the sensitivity of element modal strain energy. Finite Elem Anal Des 64:13–23

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin R (2017) Function-weighted frequency response function sensitivity method for analytical model updating. J Sound Vib 403:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin R, Lim M, Ong J (1993) Improving finite element models in the higher frequency range using modified frequency response function sensitivity method. Finite Elem Anal Des 15(2):157–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Natke H (1988) Updating computational models in the frequency domain based on measured data: a survey. Probab Eng Mech 3(1):28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedram M, Esfandiari A, Khedmati MR (2016) Finite element model updating using strain-based power spectral density for damage detection. Struct Control Health Monit 23:1314–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedram M, Esfandiari A, Khedmati MR (2017) Damage detection by a FE model updating method using power spectral density: numerical and experimental investigation. J Sound Vib 397:51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedram M, Esfandiari A, Khedmati MR (2018) Frequency domain damage detection of plate and shell structures by finite element model updating. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 26(1):100–132

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan S, Modak S (2018) A two-stage approach to updating of mass, stiffness and damping matrices. Int J Mech Sci 140:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytter A (1993) Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures, PhD Thesis, Dept. of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University

  • Saberi M, Kaveh A (2015) Damage detection of space structures using charged system search algorithm and residual force method. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 39(C2):215

    Google Scholar 

  • Salawu O (1997) Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct 19(9):718–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio R, Maia N, Silva J (1999) Damage detection using the frequency-response-function curvature method. J Sound Vib 226(5):1029–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanayei M, Esfandiari A, Rahai A, Bakhtiari-Nejad F (2012) Quasi-linear sensitivity-based structural model updating using experimental transfer functions. Struct Health Monit 11(6):656–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyedpoor S (2012) A two stage method for structural damage detection using a modal strain energy based index and particle swarm optimization. Int J Non-Linear Mech 47(1):1–8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shadan F, Khoshnoudian F, Esfandiari A (2015) A frequency response-based structural damage identification using model updating method. Struct Control Health Monit 23:286–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Law S, Zhang L (2000) Damage localization by directly using incomplete mode shapes. J Eng Mech 126(6):656–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipple JD, Sanayei M (2014) Finite element model updating using frequency response functions and numerical sensitivities. Struct Control Health Monit 21(5):784–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyagarajan S, Schulz M, Pai P, Chung J (1998) Detecting structural damage using frequency response functions. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vahedi M, Khoshnoudian F (2017) Sensitivity-based damage identification method for structures exposed to ground excitation. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 26:1–28

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wahalthantri B, Thambiratnam D, Chan T, Fawzia S (2012) An improved method to detect damage using modal strain energy based damage index. Adv Struct Eng 15(5):727–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chan TH (2009) Review of vibration-based damage detection and condition assessment of bridge structures using structural health monitoring. In: QUT conference proceedings

  • Wang X, Chang C-C, Fan L (2001) Nondestructive damage detection of bridges: a status review. Adv Struct Eng 4(2):75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Adams DE (2014) A damage identification technique based on embedded sensitivity analysis and optimization processes. J Sound Vib 333(14):3109–3119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Wang L, Wang H, Ding Y, Dang X (2009) Damage detection in composite structures using vibration response under stochastic excitation. J Sound Vib 325(4):755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan ZX, Yu KP (2015) Finite element model updating of damped structures using vibration test data under base excitation. J Sound Vib 340:303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X-Q, Xia Y, Hao H (2013) Sensor placement for structural damage detection considering measurement uncertainties. Adv Struct Eng 16(5):899–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Huang B, Yuan Y, Ru J, Weng S, Wang X, Zhou X, Xia Y, Weng S (2013) Comparisons between modal-parameter-based and flexibility-based damage identification methods. Adv Struct Eng 16(9):1611–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Li H, Lu Z, Liu J (2015) A two-step approach for structural damage localization and quantification using static and dynamic response data. Adv Struct Eng 18(9):1415–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Pedram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pedram, M., Esfandiari, A. Mitigating the Effect of Incomplete Measurement in Sensitivity-Based FE Model Updating by Enhanced Transfer Function. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 43 (Suppl 1), 467–486 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0180-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0180-6

Keywords

Navigation