Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Repair and Retrofit of RC Beam–Column Joints Using Stiffened Steel Plates

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence from past earthquakes has shown that during significant events, there are always a number of structures that stay stable but experience different forms of damage in their members. Among these members, beam–column joints in the moment frames are more susceptible to seismic loading and may experience different modes of failure. In this paper, stiffened steel plates are used to repair and retrofit a full-scale damaged RC beam–column joint. The retrofit method is based on joint enlargement. A full-scale external beam–column joint is designed and constructed as an ordinary moment resisting frame based on ACI 318M-11 provisions. The structure is then subjected to progressive quasi-static cyclic loading to failure. The damaged joint is then repaired to its former configuration using pressurized epoxy resin and retrofitted by stiffened steel plates. The repaired and retrofitted joint is then subjected to the same cyclic loading protocol to failure. Seismic performance parameters such as strength, stiffness, ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the original joint and the repaired and retrofitted joint are then extracted from their capacity backbone curves and compared. Results show that the proposed repair and retrofit technique not only regenerated the original capacity but also increased capacity and improved the joint performance by relocating the plastic hinge beyond the repaired region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI Committee 374.1-05 (2005) Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary (ACI 374.1-05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • ACI Committee 318M-11 (2011) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318M-11) and commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • ACI Committee 318-14 (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14) and commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Salloum Y, Almusallam T (2007) Seismic response of interior RC beam–column joints upgraded with FRP sheets. I: experimental study. J Compos Constr 11:575–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Salloum YA, Almusallam TH, Alsayed SH, Siddiqui NA (2011) Seismic behavior of as-built, ACI-complying, and CFRP-repaired exterior RC beam–column joints. J Compos Construct 15:522–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderon PA, Adam JM, Ivorra S, Pallares FJ, Gimenez E (2009) Design strength of axially loaded RC columns strengthened by steel caging. Mater Des 30:4069–4080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalalbashi A, Eslami A, Ronagh HR (2012) Plastic hinge relocation in RC joints as an alternative method of retrofitting using FRP. Compos Struct 94:2433–2439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogangun A (2004) Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingol earthquake in Turkey. Eng Struct 26:841–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood KJ, Matamoros AB, Wallace JW, Lehman DE, Heintz JA, Mitchell AD et al (2007) Update to ASCE/SEI 41 concrete provisions. Earthq Spectra 23:493–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeeli E, Barros JAO, Sena-Cruz J, Varum H, Melo J (2015a) Assessment of the efficiency of prefabricated hybrid composite plates (HCPs) for retrofitting of damaged interior RC beam–column joints. Compos Struct 119:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeeli E, Barros JAO, Sena-Cruz J, Fasan L, Prizzi LFR, Melo J, Varum H (2015b) Retrofitting of interior RC beam–column joints using CFRP strengthened SHCC: cast-in-place solution. Compos Struct 122:456–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-P440A. Effects of strength and stiffness degradation on seismic response. Washington: Federal Emergency Management Agency, prepared by the Applied Technology Council 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 240 Redwood City, California 94065

  • Ghobarah A, Saatcioglu M, Nistor I (2006) The impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure. Eng Struct 28:312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha GJ, Cho CG, Kang HW, Feo L (2013) Seismic improvement of RC beam–column joints using hexagonal CFRP bars combined with CFRP sheets. Compos Struct 95:464–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadigheh SA, Maheri MR, Mahini SS (2013) Performance of weak-beam, strong-column RC frames strengthened at the joints by FRP. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng 37(C1):33–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan W (1992) Advanced calculus. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karayannis CG, Sirkelis GM (2008) Strengthening and rehabilitation of RC beam–column joints using carbon-FRP jacketing and epoxy resin injection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:769–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Akbari R (2003) Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Eng Struct 25(12):1505–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Ghaffarzadeh H (2008) Connection overstrength in steel-braced RC frames. Eng Struct 30(7):1938–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Hadjipour A (2003) Experimental investigation and design of steel brace connection to RC frame. Eng Struct 25:1707–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Sahebi A (1997) Use of steel bracing in reinforced concrete frames. Eng Struct 19(12):1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Yazdani S (2016) Efficiency of the uniform force method in designing steel brace connection to RC frame. Constr Steel Res 116:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Kousari R, Razazan M (2003) Pushover tests on steel X-braced and knee-braced RC frames. Eng Struct 25(13):1697–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahini SS, Ronagh HR (2010) Strength and ductility of FRP web-bonded RC beams for the assessment of retrofitted beam–column joints. Compos Struct 92:1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niromandi A, Maheri A, Maheri MR, Mahini SS (2010) Seismic performance of ordinary RC frames retrofitted at joints by FRP sheets. Eng Struct 32:2326–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park R (1989) Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 22:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, MacRae GA (1996) Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendons. PCI J 41:64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Realfonzo R, Napoli A, Pinilla JGR (2014) Cyclic behavior of RC beam–column joints strengthened with FRP systems. Constr Build Mater 54:282–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Pinilla JG, Pallarés FJ (2014) Experimental tests on retrofitted RC beam–column joints underdesigned to seismic loads. General approach. Eng Struct 59:702–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santarsiero G, Masi A (2015) Seismic performance of RC beam–column joints retrofitted with steel. Eng Struct 85:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasmal S, Ramanjaneyulu K, Novak B, Srinivas V, Kumar KS, Korkowski C, Roehm C (2011) Seismic retrofitting of nonductile beam–column sub-assemblage using FRP. Constr Build Mater 25:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezen H, Whittaker AS, Elwood KJ, Mosalam KM (2003) Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey. Eng Struct 25:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafaei J, Hosseini A, Marefat MS (2014) Seismic retrofit of external RC beam–column joints by joint enlargement using prestressed steel angles. Eng Struct 81:265–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsonos AG (2008) Effectiveness of CFRP-jackets and RC-jackets in post-earthquake and pre-earthquake retrofitting of beam–column subassemblages. Eng Struct 30:777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsonos A-DG (2010) Performance enhancement of R/C building columns and beam–column joints through shotcrete jacketing. Eng Struct 32:726–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen JYR, Chien HK (2010) Steel plates rehabilitated RC beam–column joints subjected to vertical cyclic loads. Constr Build Mater 24:332–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarandi S, Maheri MR (2015) Seismic performance of RC frames retrofitted by FRP at joints using a flange-bonded scheme. Iran J Sci Technol 39:103–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Taucer F, Rossetto T (2009) Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Eng Struct 31:1707–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud R. Maheri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torabi, A., Maheri, M.R. Seismic Repair and Retrofit of RC Beam–Column Joints Using Stiffened Steel Plates. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 41, 13–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0027-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0027-y

Keywords

Navigation