Skip to main content
Log in

On the nonexistence of automorphic eigenfunctions of exponential growth on \(SL(3,{\mathbb {Z}})\backslash SL(3,{\mathbb {R}})/SO(3,{\mathbb {R}})\)

  • Research
  • Published:
Research in Number Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well-known that there are automorphic eigenfunctions on \(SL(2,{\mathbb {Z}})\backslash SL(2,{\mathbb {R}})/SO(2,{\mathbb {R}})\)—such as the classical j-function—that have exponential growth and have exponentially growing Fourier coefficients (e.g., negative powers of \(q=e^{2\pi i z}\), or an I-Bessel function). We show that this phenomenon does not occur on the quotient \(SL(3,{\mathbb {Z}})\backslash SL(3,{\mathbb {R}})/SO(3,{\mathbb {R}})\) and eigenvalues in general position (a removable technical assumption). More precisely, if such an automorphic eigenfunction has at most exponential growth, it cannot have non-decaying Whittaker functions in its Fourier expansion. This confirms part of a conjecture of Miatello and Wallach, who assert all automorphic eigenfunctions on this quotient (among other rank \(\ge 2\) examples) always have moderate growth. We additionally confirm their conjecture under certain natural hypotheses, such as the absolute convergence of the eigenfunction’s Fourier expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Strictly speaking, formula (1.2) needs to be slightly adjusted when \(\nu =0\), by multiplying the second term by \(\log (y)\).

  2. See [11, p. 415] for a precise statement, which includes some reducibility conditions to rule out products of automorphic functions on rank one groups.

  3. The particular choice of the constants \(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\) and \(\frac{3}{4}=(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})^2\) in (1.5) comes from the fact that region described by the inequalities contains a fundamental domain for \(SL(3,{\mathbb {Z}})\), but is not essential to the statement.

  4. The existence of such a \(\gamma \) is equivalent to that of a relatively prime pair of integers (cd) for which \(c^2y_1^2+d^2\) lies in the interval \((\frac{1}{4}|\frac{k}{\ell }|^{2/3},4|\frac{k}{\ell }|^{2/3})\); since \(|k|\ge |\ell |\) and \(y_1<1\), one can take \((c,d)=(0,1)\) when \(|\frac{k}{\ell }|<8\) and \((c,d)=(1,\lceil |\frac{k}{\ell }|^{1/3}\rceil )\) when \(|\frac{k}{\ell }|\ge 8\).

  5. Of course the pointwise estimate \([P^{m,n}F](g)\rightarrow 0\) as \(m^2+n^2\rightarrow \infty \) holds by the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma. We shall not require this fact, but remark that the tension between this decay and the growth of Whittaker functions appears to be a fundamental reason behind the truth of the Miatello–Wallach conjecture.

  6. This is readily deduced from \( \left( {\begin{matrix}{1} &{} {\theta _\gamma } \\ {0} &{} {1} \end{matrix}}\right) \left( {\begin{matrix}{(c^2+d^2)^{-1}} &{} {0} \\ {0} &{} {c^2+d^2} \end{matrix}}\right) \left( {\begin{matrix}{1} &{} {0} \\ {\theta _g} &{} {1} \end{matrix}}\right) = \gamma \gamma ^t = \left( {\begin{matrix}{a^2+b^2} &{} {ac+bd} \\ {ac+bd} &{} {c^2+d^2} \end{matrix}}\right) \).

  7. Suppose to the contrary that \(\theta _\gamma ={\textstyle {\frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}}}\in \pm \frac{1}{4}+{\mathbb {Z}}\); it is clear c cannot be 0, for then \(d=\pm 1\). By adding integral multiplies of (cd) to (ab) (which does not change the coset representative of \( \left( {\begin{matrix}{a} &{} {b} \\ {c} &{} {d} \end{matrix}}\right) \in \varGamma _{\infty }^{(2)}\backslash \varGamma ^{(2)}\)), we may assume \({\textstyle {\frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}}}=\frac{a}{c}-\frac{d}{c(c^2+d^2)}=\pm \frac{1}{4}\), or equivalently that \(4d=(c^2+d^2)(4a\mp c)\). However, \(c^2+d^2>4|d|\) if \(|d|>4\), in which case it certainly cannot divide 4|d|. Neither can \(c^2+9\) divide 12 (when \(|d|=3\)), nor \(c^2+4\) divide 8 (when \(|d|=2\)), since c must be odd when d is even. Is it trivial to see there are no solutions when \(|d|\le 1\) and \(c\ne 0\).

References

  1. Averbuch, V.: Remark on the definition of an automorphic form. Compos. Math. 59(1), 3–13 (1986)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Borel, A.: Automorphic Forms on \(\text{ SL }_{2} ({\mathbf{R}})\). Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 130. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bump, D.: Automorphic Forms on \({\rm GL}(3, {\mathbf{R}})\). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1083. Springer, Berlin (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bump, D.: Automorphic Forms and Representations. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 55. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bump, D., Huntley, J.: Unramified Whittaker functions for GL(3, R). J. Anal. Math. 65, 19–44 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788764

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. http://dlmf.nist.gov/10.32

  7. Givental, A.: Stationary Phase Integrals, Quantum Toda Lattices, Flag Manifolds and the Mirror Conjecture, Topics in Singularity Theory. American Mathematics Society Translations: Series 2, vol. 180. pp. 103–115. American Mathematics Society, Providence, RI (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Götzky, F.: Über eine zahlentheoretische Anwendung von Modulfunktionen zweier Veränderlicher. Math. Ann. 100(1), 411–437 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448854. (German)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishii, T., Stade, E.: New formulas for Whittaker functions on \({\rm GL}(n, {\mathbb{R}})\). J. Funct. Anal. 244(1), 289–314 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2006.12.004

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Koecher, M.: Zur Theorie der Modulformen n-ten Grades. I. Math. Z. 59, 399–416 (1954). German

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Miatello, R., Wallach, N.R.: Automorphic forms constructed from Whittaker vectors. J. Funct. Anal. 86(2), 411–487 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(89)90059-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Piatetski-Shapiro, I.I.: Multiplicity one theorems, Automorphic forms, representations and \(L\)-functions. In: Proceedings of Symposium Pure Mathematics XXXIII, Part 1, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 1977. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, pp. 209–212 (1979)

  13. Shalika, J.A.: The multiplicity one theorem for \({\rm GL}_{n}\). Ann. Math. (2) 100, 171–193 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Stade, E.: The reciprocal of the beta function and \({\rm GL}(n, {\mathbf{R}})\) Whittaker functions. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 44(1), 93–108 (1994). (English, with English and French summaries)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Templier, N.: Private communication

  16. To, T.-M.: Asymptotic expansions of matrix coefficients of Whittaker vectors at irregular singularities. Acta Math. 175(2), 227–271 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Trinh, T.D.: Rutgers University, Ph.D. dissertation (2016)

  18. Vinogradov, A.I., Tahtadžjan, L.A.: Theory of the Eisenstein series for the group \({\rm SL}(3,\,{\mathbf{R}})\) and its application to a binary problem. I. Fourier expansion of the highest Eisenstein series. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 76, 5–52 (1978). 216 (Russian). Analytic number theory and the theory of functions

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Nolan Wallach for his generous discussions and advice, out of which key ideas emerged. The authors would also like to thank Daniel Bump, Bill Casselman, Dorian Goldfeld, Peter Sarnak, Wilfried Schmid, Eric Stade, Nicolas Templier, Akshay Venkatesh, and Gregg Zuckerman for their guidance on various aspects of growth estimates.

Funding

Funding was provided by National Science Foundation (Grant Nos. DMS-1500562 and DMS-1801417).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen D. Miller.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, S.D., Trinh, T. On the nonexistence of automorphic eigenfunctions of exponential growth on \(SL(3,{\mathbb {Z}})\backslash SL(3,{\mathbb {R}})/SO(3,{\mathbb {R}})\). Res. number theory 5, 31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40993-019-0168-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40993-019-0168-8

Keywords

Navigation