Skip to main content
Log in

Development of an Image Analysis Protocol to Define Noise in Wet Magnetic Particle Inspection

  • Published:
International Journal of Metalcasting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a novel method to quantify the effectiveness of wet magnetic particle inspection (MPI) when detecting possible defects. Wet MPI is an established method utilizing magnetic fields to locate possible areas of defects in ferromagnetic parts. The capability of this method has been evaluated in the past most notably using the probability of detection graphs. However, MPI requires a large amount of data and is subjective because it is based on human operators’ evaluation. The method proposed in this paper is an objective method to determine the effectiveness of the MPI test based on how well discontinuities can be delineated in the image. This approach utilizes the intensity of the particle illumination in the defect area and compares it to its surroundings. This analysis generates a value to objectively represent how well a discontinuity can be identified. This method was then used to validate the effect of surface roughness on the effectiveness of wet MPI using two experiments. The first experiment was conducted to test for the collection of particles on varying surface roughness levels, and the second experiment was used to evaluate the effect of surface roughness when detecting a subsurface discontinuity. Results indicate that there is a significant increase in particle collection as roughness increases, and as the surface roughness increases, the harder it is to locate discontinuities. This method provides a quantitative measure that could be used to aid parameter selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.Y. Lee, S.J. Lee, D.C. Jiles, M. Garton, R. Lopez, L. Brasche, Sensitivity analysis of simulations for magnetic particle inspection using the finite-element method. IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 3604–3606 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ibrahim et al., Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) capsule material selection and its robustness analysis in oil and gas pipeline. Sens. Transducers 156(9), 67 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Lovejoy, D. Lovejoy, “Magnetic Particles, Their Characteristics and Application,” in Magnetic Particle Inspection (Springer, Dordrecht, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M.A.A.A. Abd-Allah, “Determination of Length, Thickness and Elements of Some Samples defects By Using magnetic particles and Ultrasound testing”, 1–48 (2016)

  5. “6 Advantages of Wet Suspension Magnetic Particle Testing,” Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Blog–TSH. [Online]. Available: http://tspndt.com/non-destructive-testing-industrial-supplies-blog/6-advantages-of-wet-suspension-magnetic-particle-testing

  6. M. Wright, “How to implement a PoD into a highly effective inspection strategy,” NDT Canada 2016 6th Int. CANDU In-Service Insp. Work. Nov 15-17, Burlington, (NDT Canada 2016)

  7. C.A. Harding, G.R. Hugo, “Guidelines for interpretation of published data on probability of detection for nondestructive testing,” 1–20 (2011)

  8. D. Lovejoy, D. Lovejoy, “The History and Basis of the Magnetic Particle Testing Method”, in Magnetic Particle Inspection (Springer, Dordrecht, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Lovejoy, D. Lovejoy, “Choosing a Magnetic Particle Inspection Method”, in Magnetic Particle Inspection (Springer, Dordrecht, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. D.J. Eisenmann, D.D. Enyart, D.Kosaka, C.Lo, “Fundamental engineering studies of magnetic particle inspection and impact on standards and industrial practice,” (2014)

  11. E. Li, Y. Kang, J. Tang, J. Wu, A new micro magnetic bridge probe in magnetic flux leakage for detecting micro-cracks. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 37(3), 46 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Schimpf, F. Peters, Variogram roughness method for casting surface characterization. Int. J. Met. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00451-0

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is sponsored by the DLA–Troop Support, Philadelphia, PA, and the Defense Logistics Agency Information Operations, J68, Research & Development, Ft. Belvoir, VA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon May Yen Lau.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Disclaimer: The publication of this material does not constitute approval by the government of the findings or conclusion herein. Wide distribution or announcement of this material shall not be made without specific approval by the sponsoring government activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lau, S.M.Y., Eisenmann, D. & Peters, F.E. Development of an Image Analysis Protocol to Define Noise in Wet Magnetic Particle Inspection. Inter Metalcast 15, 1317–1325 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00566-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00566-4

Keywords

Navigation