Abstract
Scientific revolution is a widely known concept. But does revolution really occur in science? Change through revolution means that present thinking does not retain anything from the past, because everything is thrown away due to the revolution. Does this pattern of change really correspond to the history of science? There is another pattern which is called evolution. This writing will show that process of evolution rather than revolution presents the real situation of scientific change. According to this concept, science grows as an organic species grows in certain environment. An organism is different from its every former stage, yet it remains the same organism throughout its life. In the same way, we will find both change and continuity in scientific growth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, J. L. (1984). A realist philosophy of science. London: Macmillan Press.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method. London: Atlantic Highland Newleft Books Humanities Press.
Hacking, I. (1981). Scientific revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kantrovich, A., & Ne’eman, Y. (1989). Serendipity as source of evolutionary progress in science. In N. Jardin (Ed.), Studies in the history and philosophy of science (Vol. 20). Oxford: Pergaman Process Ple.
Kitchener, R. F. (1987). Genetic epistemology, equilibration and the rationality of scientific change. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,8(3), 339–366.
Krajewski, W. (1977). Correspondence principle and the growth of science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lawrence, W. (1922). Lectures on physiology, zoology and the natural history of man. London: Kaygill.
Margolis, J. (1986). Pragmatism without foundation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Popper, K. (1965). Conjectures and refutation. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Popper, K. (1979). Objective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Thomson, J. J. (1936). Recollections and reflections. London: G. Bell and Sons.
Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and understanding. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mannan, M.A. Revolution Versus Evolution: The Pattern of Conceptual Change in Science. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 37, 175–189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-020-00203-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-020-00203-9