Abstract
The present article consists of four parts, and the first part examines the concept of life-world from the phenomenological perspective and argues that the characteristic features of the life-world would be through inspection, analysis and description of the life as we encounter it devoid of scientific explanations. The second part of the paper develops the idea that religion finds its meaning and significance only in the domain of life-world because the phenomena that one experiences in the religious acts take place primarily in a pre-theoretical way. Thus, it is argued that the operative dimension of phenomenology of religious consciousness involves a new understanding of subjectivity—a passive plane of subjectivity—whose locus is differently conceived by Husserl, Scheler and Heidegger. The third part of the paper draws attention to the religious phenomena whose intended structures and meanings go beyond mediation and suggests that symbols form a realm between objectively given things and subjectively intended meanings. In other words, religious symbols serve as indispensable mediating bridges. The final part of the paper proposes that religious experiences like all other experiences, though are rooted in life-world, yet it transcends its worldly contents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arapura, J. G. (1986). Hermeneutical essays on vedantic topics (p. 71). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Durkheim, E. (1961). Elementary forms of religious life (p. 229). New York: Collier Books.
Frings, M. S., & Scheler, M. (1970). Focusing on rarely seen complexities of phenomenology. In F. J. Smith (Ed.), Phenomenology in perspective (pp. 34–35). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Gurwitsch, A. (1970). Problems of the life-world. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and social reality: Essays in memory of Alfred Schutz. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Horosz, W. (1971). Religion and culture in modern perspective. In C. Feaver & W. Horosz (Eds.), Religion in philosophical and cultural perspective (p. 309). New Delhi: Affiliated East West Press.
Husserl, E. (1969). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (Boyce Gibson, W.R., Trans.) (pp. 95–96). London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd,. Sec 26.
Husserl, E. (1970). Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology, trans. D. Carr. (p. xii). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Janicaud, D. (2000). Phenomenology and the “theological turn”: The French debate (p. 116). New York: Fordham University Press.
Maslow, A. H. (1964). Religions, values and peak experiences (p. 19). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Melling, D. (1982). Forms of experienced spatiality. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology,13(3), 277.
Oman, J. (1931). The natural and the supernatural (p. 448). Cambridge: CUP.
Prusak, G. B. (2000). Phenomenology and the “theological turn”: The French debate (p. 13). New York: Fordham University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2000). Experience and language in religious discourse, trans. Jeffrey L. Kosky. In Phenomenology and the “theological turn”: The French debate (p. 128). New York: Fordham University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Velassery, S., Patra, R.T. Life-World and Religious Consciousness. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 36, 405–415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-019-00180-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-019-00180-8