Skip to main content
Log in

Interrogating the Epiphenomenalist Tradition

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epiphenomenalism has had a long historical tradition. It is the view that mental properties are causally inert with respect to the physical world. In this paper, I argue that this tradition faces enormous challenges and needs better arguments to defend its position, and to demonstrate this, I interrogate the (mostly contemporary) strands including computationalism, the idea of the illusion of conscious will, and causal exclusionism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Descartes (1989), p. 4.

  2. Ibid, p. 12.

  3. Huxley 2015 (1874), 215–216.

  4. From “responses” You can substitute with a quotation from fifth meditation.

  5. Descartes, Passions of the Soul, Ch 1.1, 350–360.

  6. Huxley 2015 (1874), 220.

  7. Ibid, 222.

  8. Ibid, 223.

  9. Ibid, 228–9.

  10. Ibid.

  11. Ibid, 241.

  12. Ibid, 244.

  13. Jackson (1990), p. 469.

  14. Ibid, 474.

  15. Hume (1955), p. 41. See also Wiredu (1996), p. 39 for similar criticism.

  16. Jackson (1990), p. 474.

  17. Jackson (1990), p. 474.

  18. Campbell (1984), pp. 48, 135.

  19. Ibid, p. 48.

  20. Ibid, pp. 48–9.

  21. Preston and Astbury (1937): 77.

  22. Ibid, p. 475.

  23. Ibid.

  24. Ibid.

  25. Jackson (1996), p. 391.

  26. Ibid, p. 390.

  27. Ibid, pp. 391–2.

  28. Putnam (1960, 1967).

  29. Block (1990).

  30. Ibid, p. 140.

  31. Ibid, p. 138.

  32. Ibid, p. 145.

  33. Ibid.

  34. Ibid, p. 146.

  35. Ibid, p. 153.

  36. Ibid.

  37. Ibid, p. 154.

  38. Ibid.

  39. Ibid.

  40. Ibid.

  41. Ibid, p. 155.

  42. Ibid, pp. 155–6.

  43. Yablo (1992), p. 246.

  44. Kim (1998), p. 38.

References

  • Block, N. (1990). Can the mind change the world? In George Boolos (Ed.), Meaning and method: Essays in honor of Hilary Putnam (pp. 137–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1989). The passions of the soul (Les Passions de l’Ame). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfs/descartes1649.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.

  • Campbell, K. (1984). Body and Mind (Second Edition). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Hume, D. (1955). In C. W. Hendel (Ed.), An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. H. 2011 (1874). On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. Journal of Cosmology 14. http://journalofcosmology.com/Consciousness137.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.

  • Jackson, F. (1990). Epiphenomenal qualia. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader (pp. 469–477). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1996). Mental causation. Mind, 105(419), 377–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, R. D., & Astbury, W. T. (1937). The structure of the wall of the green alga Valonia ventricosa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 122(826), 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1960). Minds and machines. In S. Hook (Ed.), Dimensions of mind. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1967). Psychological predicates. In W. H. Capitan & D. D. Merrill (Eds.), Art, mind and religion. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiredu, K. (1996). Cultural Universals and Particulars, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

  • Yablo, S. (1992). Mental causation. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 245–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ani, E.I. Interrogating the Epiphenomenalist Tradition. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 33, 481–501 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-016-0065-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-016-0065-7

Keywords

Navigation