Abstract
Aims and Objectives
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of single test (HPV DNA) with double tests (HPV DNA and VIA/VILI) for cervical cancer screening.
Materials and Methods
This hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out on 256 women aged between 30 and 65 years. All women underwent HPV DNA test followed by VIA/VILI test and colposcopy. Colposcopic-guided biopsy was performed in 35 women with Reids score 3 and above. Diagnostic accuracy of HPV, VIA and VILI tests was calculated taking colposcopy and HPE reports as gold standard. The diagnostic tests included sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, and kappa statistics was applied to find agreement levels among various tests.
Results
Pre-invasive lesions were significantly more common in lower socioeconomic group of women. HPV DNA test was positive in 8.5%, VIA in 19.5% and VILI in 15.2% of women. The agreement level was fair between HPV and VIA (k = 0.34), moderate between HPV and VILI (k = 0.51) and good between VIA and VILI (k = 0.79). HPV DNA test had significantly high specificity while VIA/VILI was more sensitive tests. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of HPV test alone or with VIA/VILI.
Conclusion
Addition of VIA and VILI does not increase the diagnostic accuracy of HPV DNA test for cervical cancer screening.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Global cancer observatory. IARC, WHO March 2021.
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin D. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. IARC Cancer Base No. 10 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC; 2010
Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behaviour of mild cervical dysplasia during long term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(5):665–9.
Kurkure AP, Yeole BB. Social inequalities in cancer with special reference to South Asian countries. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7:36.
Jussawalla DJ, Yeole BB, Natekar MV. Cancer morbidity and mortality in greater Bombay-1991. Mumbai, India: Indian Cancer Society; 1993.
WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention.WHO 2013. www.who.int
Udumudi A, Jaiswal M, Rajeswari N, Desai N, Jain S, Balakrishna N, Rao KV, Ahuja YR. Risk assessment in cervical dysplasia patients by single cell gel electrophoresis assay: a study of DNA damage and repair. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 1998;412(2):195–205.
Kurkuri AP, Yeole BB. Social inequalities in cancer with special reference to South Asian countries. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7(1):36.
Joshi S, Sankaranarayanan R, Muwonge R, Kulkarni V, Somanathan T, Divate U. Screening of cervical neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India. AIDS. 2013;27(4):607–15.
Kuhn L, Wang C, Tsai WY, Wright TC, Denny L. Efficacy of human papillomavirus-based screen-and-treat for cervical cancer prevention among HIV-infected women. AIDS. 2010;24(16):2553–61.
Shastri SS, Dinshaw K, Amin G, Goswami S, Patil S, Chinoy R, Kane S, Kelkar R, Muwonge R, Mahé C, Ajit D. Concurrent evaluation of visual, cytological and HPV testing as screening methods for the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Mumbai, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(3):186–94.
Gravitt PE, Paul P, Katki HA, Vendantham H, Ramakrishna G, Sudula M, Kalpana B, Ronnett BM, Vijayaraghavan K, Shah KV, CATCH Study Team. Pap, and HPV DNA testing in a cervical cancer screening program in a peri-urban community in Andhra Pradesh, India. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):711.
Bhatla N, Dar L, Patro AR, Kriplani A, Gulati A, Verma K, Broor S, Shah KV, Gravitt PE. Human papillomavirus type distribution in cervical cancer in Delhi, India. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2006;25(4):398–402.
Pimple S, Shastri SS. Comparative evaluation of human papilloma virus-DNA test verses colposcopy as secondary cervical cancer screening test to triage screen positive women on primary screening by visual inspection with 5% Acetic acid, Indian. J Cancer. 2014;51(2):117.
Van Le L, et al. Acetic acid visualization of the cervix to detect cervical dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:293–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NS took part in concept of study and final manuscript; JS involved in data collection, analysis and manuscript draft; NS and US participated in patient management.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest in the present study.
Ethical Approval
A prior approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of King Georges Medical University of Lucknow vide letter No. 8002/Ethics/R.Cell-15 to conduct the research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, N., Singh, J. & Singh, U. Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening with Single Test (HPV DNA Test) Versus Double Tests (HPV DNA Test with VIA/VILI). Indian J Gynecol Oncolog 19, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00573-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00573-1