Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Impact of Frozen Section Analysis in Surgery for Ovarian Neoplasms

  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Frozen section is a valuable diagnostic tool that can identify the nature of the ovarian lesions intra-operatively thus helping to select appropriate surgery for the patient. In the present study, we are analyzing the accuracy of frozen section in diagnosing benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors and the impact of change which frozen section diagnosis made on planned surgery.

Methods

Frozen section diagnosis and final histopathology reports of 178 patients operated between January 2010 and August 2014 were compared. Accuracy of the frozen section and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in diagnosing benign, malignant, and borderline lesions were analyzed. The impact on surgery was calculated by assessing the percentage of patients in whom the surgical management deviated from the planned procedure based on frozen section results.

Results

Frozen section reports showed an overall diagnostic accuracy of 92.7 %. The sensitivity and specificity in predicting benign, borderline, and malignant tumors were 99, 72.7, and 89 %, and 86.8, 98.8, and 100 %, respectively. Accuracy in detecting mucinous tumors was 85.5 %. In 26.9 % of the patients, the surgical management was changed to better suit the patient based on the frozen section result.

Conclusion

Intra-operative frozen section is an accurate diagnostic tool that helped change the planned surgeries in a quarter of patients in whom the examination was sought for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Time trends in Cancer Incidence rates 1982–2005, National Cancer Registry Program, Indian Council of Medical Research, 2009; 82

  2. Naik R, Cross P, Lopes A, Godfrey K, Hatem MH. “True” versus “apparent” stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: value of frozen section analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maheshwari A, Gupta S, Kane S, Kulkarni Y, Goyal BK, Tongaonkar HB. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms: experience at a tertiary oncology center. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;24(4):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Subbian A, Devi UK, Bafna UD. Accuracy rate of frozen section studies in ovarian cancers: a regional cancer institute experience. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50(4):302–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sukumaran R, Somanathan T, Mathews A, Kattor J, Sambasivan S, Nair RP. Role of frozen section in intraoperative assessment of ovarian masses: a tertiary oncology center experience. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2014;5(2):99–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Açikalin A, Torun G, Bağir E, Bayram F, Zeren H, Güleç U, et al. Intraoperative frozen section in ovarian neoplasms; a tertiary center experience. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2014;30(3):184–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gultekin E, Gultekin OE, Cingillioglu B, Sayhan S, Sanci M, Yildirim Y. The value of frozen section evaluation in the management of borderline ovarian tumors. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;7(4):416–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pinto PB, Andrade LA, Derchain SF. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81:230–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Storms A-A, Sukumvanich P, Monaco SE, Beriwal S, Krivak TC, Olawaiye AB, et al. Mucinous tumors of the ovary: diagnostic challenges at frozen section and clinical implications. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(1):75–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Houck K, Nikrui N, Duska L, Chang Y, Fuller AF, Bell D, et al. Borderline tumors of the ovary: correlation of frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:839–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Puls L, Heidtman E, Hunter JE, Crane M, Stafford J. The accuracy of frozen section by tumor weight for ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;67(1):16–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Twaalfhoven FC, Peters AA, Trimbos JB, Hermans J, Fleuren GJ. The accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;41(3):189–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the support of Ms. Sheejamol V S who helped me with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anupama Rajanbabu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajanbabu, A., Nair, I.R., Goel, G. et al. Evaluating the Impact of Frozen Section Analysis in Surgery for Ovarian Neoplasms. Indian J Gynecol Oncolog 13, 7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-015-0007-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-015-0007-3

Keywords

Navigation