Skip to main content
Log in

The Philosophy of Management Today

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay reviews the recently released Handbook of Philosophy of Management, using it as a jumping off point to explore some potential confusions in contemporary philosophy of management. The handbook itself, comprising 58 articles and some 1,000 pages, is a milestone for the field. At the same time, it brings a few problems into sharp relief. I argue for more clarity about the distinction between the philosophy of management and the philosophy of management research. I make the case that logic as a de facto method for conducting inquiry may or may not be useful, while logic as a de jure standard for evaluating its conclusions is indispensable. I develop the view that neither management nor management studies is properly considered a science, or even an applied science. I contend that the seminal contributions of Alasdair MacIntyre are unjustly neglected by the field. And I advance the thesis that perhaps the leading issue for the philosophy of management today is the question of the purpose of management, pointing in some suggested directions for answering the question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I am grateful for comments on an earlier draft from Nigel Laurie and Anjan Chakravartty.

  2. On one standard interpretation, induction characterizes any argument that aims to make probable—but not certain—its conclusion. On this account, retroduction and abduction are simply varieties of induction. This is developed in Wilson (2020), Chap. 16.

  3. Were there more space, these features could be fruitfully linked to other related features of the mental: Brentano’s account of the mental as irreducibly intentional; Nagel’s case for its essential subjectivity; and Quine’s observations about the failures of substitutivity in attitude contexts.

  4. Another conspicuous omission is Peter Drucker, not a professional philosopher but a deeply philosophical and humanistic thinker who is sometimes referred to as “the father of modern management.”

  5. I affirm that I have no conflict of interest.

References

  • Agafonow, Alejandro. 2022. “Philosophy of Science for Management Theory, Practice, and Sci-fi Freaks: An Introduction.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 205–218. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Beadle, Ron, and Geoffrey Moore. 2008. MacIntyre, Empirics and Organisation: guest editors’ introduction. ” Philosophy of Management 7(1): 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin Grossmann-Hensel and David Seidl. 2022. “Problematizing the Relation Between Management Research and Practice.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 183–202. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Bernacchio, C. 2023. Toward a constructive critique of Managerial Agency: MacIntyre’s contribution to strategy as practice. Philosophy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00229-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, Norman, and Jan Priest. 2022. “Management Research and Practices: Philosophies and Logics.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 235–264. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Blok, Vincent. 2022. “Xenophon’s Philosophy of Management.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 565–584. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Deranty, Jean-Philippe. 2022. “The Organization of Philosophy and a Philosophy of Organizations.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 981–1002. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Donaldson, Tom. 2022. “How Methods of Moral Philosophy Inform Business.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 677–692. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Eabrasu, Marian, and E. Lamy. 2023. Do managerial practices need philosophy? Philosophy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00241-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkal, Hakan, and Wim Vandekerckhove. 2021. Twenty years of philosophy of management. How has it shaped the field? Philosophy of Management 20(4): 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gare, Arran. 2022. “Philosophical Anthropology and Business Ethics.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 693–712. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Gare, Arran, and Cristina Neesham. 2022. “Creating an Effective Business Ethics.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 793–808. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1971. The Entropy Law and the economic process. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griseri, Paul. 2013. Introduction to the philosophy of management. New York: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, Alicia, and Matthias Niedenführ. 2022a. “Confucianism and Ethics in Management.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 837–850. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Hennig, Alicia, and Matthias Niedenführ. 2022b. “Daoism and Ethics in Management.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 851–862. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Küpers, Wendelin. 2022. “Aesthetics and Leadership.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 491–508. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Lamy, E. 2022. Is epistemology necessary? Philosophy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00209-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela, Frank. 2022. “Is Moral Growth Possible for Managers?” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 883–896. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Neesham, Cristana, Markus Reihlen, and Dennis Schoeneborn. eds. 2022. Handbook of philosophy of management. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, Marybel, and Alejandro Agafonow. 2022a. “Discoveries in the Science of Organizational Economics.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 265–286. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Perez, Marybel, and Alejandro Agafonow. 2022b. “No Organizations for Today’s Einsteins.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 287–308. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Reihlen, Markus, and Dennis Schoeneborn. 2022. “The Epistemology of Management: An Introduction.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 17–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Spillane, Robert. 2022. “Weeding the Management Garden: Hume’s Fork and Action Nominalism at Work.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 959–980. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Tsahuridu, E. 2022. Reflecting on practice: an interview with Nigel Laurie. Philosophy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00221-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove, Wim. 2022. “Aesthetics of Management: An Introduction.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 357–368. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Werhane, Pat, and David Bevan. 2022. “Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy and Its Relevance for Modern Management.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 713–730. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Wilson, David Carl. 2020. A Guide to Good Reasoning: Cultivating Intellectual Virtues, 2nd Edition Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

  • Wray-Bliss, Edward. 2022. “Critical Moral Philosophy and Management.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, eds. Neesham pp. 731–742. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Carl Wilson.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, D.C. The Philosophy of Management Today. Philosophy of Management 22, 493–503 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00244-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00244-5

Keywords

Navigation