Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of macro-invertebrates’ colonization in the context of impacts of exotic and native broadleaf litter species in Ethiopia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of macro-invertebrates in freshwater habitats is influenced by invasive and native plant litter. The objective of this investigation was to determine whether stream water quality and macro-invertebrates’ communities were affected by the leaf litter from alien and native broadleaf plants. The litter input was collected and manipulated in the Gulufa River's upper, middle, and lower tributaries. In the stream corridors, two exotic litter species (Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus globulas) and two native broadleaf litter species (Croton macrostachyus and Ficus sure) were chosen. The sampling methods were classified as upper, middle, and lower approaches. A total of 84 independent litter bag samples were used in the experiments. Of these, 42 of the litter bags were filled with the exotic litter species, and the other 42 litter bags were filled with native broadleaf litter species, respectively. The quality of the water was analyzed in the laboratory and in the field. The macro-invertebrate colonization was assessed using the exotic and native broadleaf litter species. The leaf litter types used in the laboratory and field tests were as follows: Croton macrostachyus, Eucalyptus grandis, Ficus sure, and Eucalyptus globulas. A total of 2297 macro-invertebrates from 48 families were quantified. The percentage composition of Diptera was high with colonization of the leaf pouches with exotic litter species (Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus globulas) with a relative frequency of 29 and 42%. The percentage composition of all the orders associated with the leaf litter species that contained certain species of Ficus sure was found to be higher in frequency (Coleoptera: 74%, Odonata: 64%, Hemiptera: 59%, Ephemeroptera: 54%, and Trichoptera: 44%, respectively), with the exception of Diptera (11%). These findings suggest that the monocultures of the exotic plant species have an impact on aquatic communities. Furthermore, macro-invertebrate assemblages were higher in the substrates composed of native broadleaf litter species than in the substrates composed of exotic leaf litter species. However, the impact can be mitigated if the original vegetation of the native riparian corridors is preserved as soon as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

It is available in this manuscript based on the policy; the author follows the basic share-on-demand policy. The result of this article was found in the article.

References

  • Abdul NH, Rawi CSM (2019) Functional Feeding Group (FFG) of aquatic macroinvertebrate in Middle Reach of Kerian River Basin of North Malaysia Peninsula. 30(2). https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr20

  • Alvim EACC, Medeiros AO, Rezende RS, Gonçalves Júnior JF (2015) on om m er ci us e on om m er ci 74(2):248–260. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2014.982

  • Anbalagan S, Pratheep T, Dinakaran S, Krishnan M (2012) Effects of two leaf litter species on the colonization of macroinvertebrates in a tropical stream of INDIA. pp 533–538

  • APHA (1995) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage PD, Moss D, Wright JF, Furse MT (1983) The permance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of un polluted running water sites. Water Res 17(3):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt E, Fiedler ÆS, Bo ÆD (2014) Effects of invasive benthic macroinvertebrates on assessment methods of the EU Water Frame Work Directive Effects of invasive benthic macroinvertebrates on assessment methods of the EU Water Frame Work Directive. Hydrobiologia. 635:309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9923-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschalew L, Moog O (2015) Benthic macroinvertebrates based new biotic score ‘ETHbios’ for assessing ecological conditions of highland streams and rivers in Ethiopia Limnologica Benthic macroinvertebrates based new biotic score. Elsevier GmbH 52:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2015.02.002 (July 2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauger A, Lair N, Peiry J (2006) The distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in a reach of the River Allier (France), in relation to riverbed characteristics. (June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0217-x

  • Becerra-Rodas C et al. (2019) The role of streamside native forests on dissolved organic matter in Forested and Agricultural Watersheds in Northwestern Patagonia. 1–14

  • Benetti CJ, Pérez-bilbao A, Garrido J (2004) Macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality in running waters : 10 years of research in rivers with different degrees of anthropogenic impacts

  • Bo T et al (2014) The influence of water quality and macroinvertebrate colonization on the breakdown process of native and exotic leaf types in sub-alpine stream. J Freshwater Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2013.879538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard RW Jr (2004) Guide to aquatic macroinvertebrates of the Upper Midwest. Water Resources Center, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara IA, Kra MK, Kouadio NK (2020) Composition, structure and functional feeding of aquatic entomofauna in Kodjoboué Lake: Water Quality Assessment. 160–176. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2020.104011

  • Canhoto C, Graqa MAS (1996) Decomposition of Eucalyptus globulus leaves and three native leaf species (Alnus glutinosa, Castanea sativa and Quercus faginea) in a Portuguese low order stream. pp 79–85

  • Cassart B et al (2020) Average leaf litter quality drives the decomposition of single-species, mixed-species and transplanted leaf litters for two contrasting tropical forest types in the Congo Basin (DRC). Ann Forest Sci 77:33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00942-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceneviva-bastos M, Boracini D, Mei R De (2017) Limnologica Trophic guilds of EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in three basins of the Brazilian Savanna. Limnologica 63:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalchisa B, Ambelu A, Weyuma T (2022) Compare the efficiency of artificial substrates and leaf litter substrates in macro-invertebrates aggregation samples at Gilgel Gibe Watershade, Southwest Ethiopia. Environ Chall 8(February):100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamier J et al (2012) Impacts of invasive alien plants on water quality, with particular emphasis on South Africa. 38(2):345–357

  • Chanie T et al (2013) Eco-hydrological impacts of Eucalyptus in the semi humid Ethiopian Highlands: the Lake Tana Plain. 21–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2013-0004

  • DeErechim C et al (2019) Effects of leaf litter traits on alpha and beta diversities of invertebrate assemblages in a tropical watershed. 365–379

  • Dosskey MG et al (2010) The role of riparian vegetation in protecting and improving chemical water quality in streams1. J Am Water Res Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00419.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou P et al (2022) Benthic macroinvertebrate diversity as affected by the construction of inland waterways along montane stretches of

  • Feio MJ, Hughes RM, Callisto M et al (2021) The biological assessment and rehabilitation of the world’s rivers: an overview. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira V et al (2015) The effects of eucalypt plantations on plant litter decomposition and macroinvertebrate communities in Iberian streams. For Ecol Manag 335:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco Goncalves J Jr., de Souza Rezende R, Franca J, Callisto M (2012) Invertebrate colonisation during leaf processing of native, exotic and artificial detritus in a tropical stream. Marine Freshwater Res 63(5):428–439. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF11172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fualing D (2009) Riparian ecosystem management—a case study of the ellidaá and ytrirangá rivers in iceland, pp. 173–207

  • Gamito S, Patricio J, Neto JM, Teixeira H, Marques JC (2012) Feeding diversity index as complementary information in the assessment of ecological quality status. 73–78

  • Gonc JF et al (2014) Limnologica relationship between dynamics of litterfall and riparian plant species in a tropical stream. 44:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2013.05.010

  • Graça MAS et al (2015) Macroinvertebrate identity, not diversity, differed across patches differing in substrate particle size and leaf litter packs in low order, tropical Atlantic forest streams. Limnetica 34(1):29–40. https://doi.org/10.23818/limn.34.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilloy Á, Tabacchi E, Lambs L (2000) Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (OATAO) Impacts of riparian vegetation on hydrological processes Abstract: 14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14

  • Henrique P et al (2021) Effect of eucalyptus plantations on the taxonomic and functional structure of aquatic insect assemblages in Neotropical springs. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 00(00):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2021.1895512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepp LU, Biasi C, Milesi SV, Veiga FO, Restello RM (2008) Chironomidae (Diptera) larvae associated to Eucalyptus globulus and Eugenia uniflora leaf litter in a subtropical stream (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 20(1):345–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain QA, Pandit AK (2012) Macroinvertebrates in streams: a review of some ecological factors. Int J Fish Aqua 4(7):114–123. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJFA11.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerves-Cobo R et al (2017) A methodology to model environmental preferences of EPT taxa in the Machangara River Basin (Ecuador). Water (switzerland) 9(3):1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaboré I et al (2018) Developing reference criteria for the ecological status of West African rivers. Environ Monit Assess 190:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6360-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates N (2007) Macroinvertebrate colonization of invasive Fallopia x bohemica leaf litter in a temperate stream. (May)

  • Kazakou E et al (2009) Litter quality and decomposability of species from a Mediterranean succession depend on leaf traits but not on nitrogen supply. 1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp202

  • Kleynhans CJ (2007) Module D: Fish Response Assessment Index in River EcoClassification: Manual for EcoStatus Determination (version 2) Joint Water Research Commission and Department of Water Affairs and Forestry report. WRC Report No. TT330/08. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1859.4000

  • Kubendran T, Ramesh M (2016) Composition and distribution of aquatic insect communities in relation to water quality in two freshwater streams of southern western ghats, India Composition and distribution of aquatic insect communities in relation to water quality in two freshwater s’, (December 2017)

  • König R, Ubiratan L, Santos S (2014) Limnologica colonisation of low- and high-quality detritus by benthic macroinvertebrates during leaf breakdown in a subtropical stream. Limnologica 45:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2013.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakew A (2015) Assessing anthropogenic impacts using benthic macroinvertebrate as bio-indicators in central highland streams of Ethiopia, (April). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v8i1.5

  • Larrañaga A et al (2006) Assessing impact of eucalyptus plantations on benthic macroinver tebrate communities by a litter exclusion experiment. 42(1):1–8

  • Mahmoud KMA, Sayed SSM, Habib MR (2018) Ecological assessment of the River Nile around Gizert El-Warrak by Phytoplankton and macroinvertebrates assemblages. bioRXiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/297432.

  • Mandaville SM (2002) Benthic macroinvertebrates in taxa tolerance values, metrics, and protocols. In: The use of biotic index as an indication of water quality, vol 5. pp 85–98

  • Martínez A, Larrañaga A, Pérez J, Basaguren A, Pozo J (2013) Leaf-litter quality effects on stream ecosystem functioning: a comparison among five species. (June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2013/0514

  • Masese FO et al (2014) Litter processing and shredder distribution as indicators of riparian and catchment influences on ecological health of tropical streams. Ecol Indica 46:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meragiaw M et al (2018) Woody species composition and diversity of riparian vegetation along the Walga River. Plus one, Southwestern Ethiopia, pp 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204733

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB (2017) Trophic relationships of macroinvertebrates. In: Ddd V (ed) Methods in stream ecology. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416558-8.00020-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mnuel E, Gbarakoro T (2021) Afr J Environ Sci Technol. (April). https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST

  • Mugunga CP (2016) The use of Eucalyptus in agroforestry systems of southern Rwanda: to integrate or segregate ? Thesis committee

  • Mutshekwa T et al (2020) Macroinvertebrate colonisation associated with native and invasive leaf litter decomposition, South Africa. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2020025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto C et al (2017) The role of macroinvertebrates for conservation of freshwater systems. Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochieng H, Gandhi WP, Magezi G, Okot-Okumu J, Odong R (2021) Diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates in anthropogenically disturbed macroinvertebrates in anthropogenically disturbed Aturukuku River, Eastern Uganda. (March). https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2021.1885309

  • Pusey BJ, Arthington AH (2003) Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of fresh water fish: a review. Marine Freshwater Res 54(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF02041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez J et al (2021) Litter quality is a stronger driver than temperature of early microbial decomposition in oligotrophic streams: a microcosm study. Microbial Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01858-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahardjanto A, Kusnoputranto H, Sutjiningsih D, Francisia SS (2015) Simple method to evaluate of river quality based on riparian vegetation bioindicator. 25–35.

  • Reinhart KO, Vandevoort R (2006) Effect of native and exotic leaf litter on macroinvertebrate communities and decomposition in a western Montana stream. 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00252.x

  • Remor MB et al (2013) The effects caused by the replacement of native riparian forest with Eucalyptus sp. on the benthic macro-invertebrate community. J Food Agric Environ 11(April):1444–1448

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios SL, Bailey RC (2006) Relationship between riparian vegetation and stream benthic communities at three spatial scales. 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-0868-z

  • Sampaio G, Gon R (2017) Eucalyptus plantations: can different species determine different “ecological realities” in streams?

  • Shah V (2010) Colonization of leaf litter by benthic macroinvertebrates in Redwood Creek of Mt.Tamalpais State Park, California Vega Shah. 1–21

  • Sharifinia M et al (2016) Benthic diatom and macroinvertebrate assemblages, a key for evaluation of river health and pollution in the Shahrood River, Iran. Limnology 17(1):95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-015-0464-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenert C, Bacca ARC, Moraes AB (2012) Negative effects of exotic pine invasion on macroinvertebrate communities in southern Brazil coastal ponds. (April). https://doi.org/10.1071/MF11169

  • Swanson S, Kozlowski D, Hall R, Heggem D, Lin J (2017) EPA Public Access Author manuscript, (March). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.2.168

  • Tadele D, Al E (2014) Effect of Eucalyptus camaldulensis stand conversion into crop production on growth and yield of maize: the case of Koga Watershed Areas in northwestern. 6(1):58–69

  • Tamiru SM (2018) “Macroinvertebrates as indicators of the water quality of River Shinta. Sustain Water Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0297-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkmen G, Kazanci N (2010) Applications of various biodiversity indices to benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams of a national park in Turkey. Rev Hydrobiol 125(May):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Yirigui Y et al (2019) Relationships between Riparian Forest Fragmentation and biological indicators of streams. 1–24

  • Yu S et al (2019) Efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus removal by six macrophytes from eutrophic water. Int J Phytoremed 21(7):643–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2018.1556582

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Wollega University Shambu Campus and Kotebe University of Education for providing various logistics.

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author consented to publish the article in the journal of sustainable water resource management, and the authors contributed useful suggestions and approved the final form of the manuscript. TWB contributed to the research's conceptualization and article revision. All authors have read and agreed to publish the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birhanu Chalchisa Werku.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Annex 1: Overview the identified taxa as well as their frequency of occurrence in all leaf bags containing leaf litter species

Annex 1: Overview the identified taxa as well as their frequency of occurrence in all leaf bags containing leaf litter species

Family

Frequency of occurrence (%)

Abundance

Aeshinidae

85

13

Coenagrionidae

50

62

Corduliidae

80

14

Lestidae

70

32

Libellulidae

75

17

Gomphidae

80

7

Caenidae

65

135

Ephermerllidae

50

47

Heptageniidae

85

24

Baetidae

65

84

Lepidostomatidae

55

95

Physidae

80

17

Hydropsychidae

70

20

Brachycentraidae

70

73

Glossosomatidae

75

18

Limnephilidae

90

4

Sciomyzidae

90

2

Simuliidae

90

2

Sphaeriidae

95

6

Tipulidae

90

9

veliidae

85

14

Ceratopogonidae

35

917

Chaoboridae

75

9

Chironomidae

50

216

Culicidae

60

76

Dixidae

85

12

Empididae

85

11

Hydrophilidae

70

33

Helodidae

100

6

Naucoridae

95

1

Nepidae

80

23

Notonectidae

85

3

Perlodidae

70

34

Hydrometridae

85

10

Corixidae

70

7

Gyrinidae

60

48

Belostomatidae

50

32

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Werku, B.C., Bulto, T.W. Assessment of macro-invertebrates’ colonization in the context of impacts of exotic and native broadleaf litter species in Ethiopia. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 9, 154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-00904-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-00904-4

Keywords

Navigation