Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

South Africa’s water regulatory and policy framework: a new institutional economic review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The institutional dynamics , policies, and legislation that were prevalent during the apartheid era have left imprints that are difficult to ignore as they still dictate the interaction between different elements in the water sector to date. The existence of riparian water rights made the legislation excluding and racist as far as water access was concerned because of the indisputable link between land ownership and access to water. Post-apartheid, the National Water Act (NWA) of 1998 has transformed the water regulatory landscape from the riparian system to a system aimed at achieving equitable water allocation for the benefit of all. It has done away with a private right system of water allocation by detaching water rights from land ownership. However, the water sector in South Africa is still facing a number challenges, leading to a delay in achieving some of the goals of the post-apartheid water law. This paper provides a review of relevant water policies and/or statutes from a new institutional economics (NIE) perspective to assess the success, or lack thereof, of post-apartheid water policy in South Africa. This paper found that South Africa’s water policy is premised largely on neoclassical economics framework. It concludes that the failure of the NWA and other institutions to incorporate social norms and customs is more likely to the persistence of skewed distribution of water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(Source: adapted from RSA 1998)

Fig. 2

(Source: adapted from RSA 1998)

Fig. 3

(Source: NWRS 2012)

Fig. 4

(Sources: Williamson 2000; Brousseau and Glachant 2008; Lieberherr 2009)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikari B (2002) Property rights and natural resource: socio-economics, heterogeneity and distributional implications of common property resource and management. EEE Working Paper 3. Environmental Department, University of York, UK

  • Audouin M, Preiser R, Neinaber S, Downsborough L, Lanz J, Mavengahama (2013) Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(3):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti G, Stuchtey M, Van Olst M (2010) Confronting South Africa’s water challenge. Mc Kinsey and Company, New York

  • Bowen G (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 9(2):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau E, Glachant J (2008) New institutional economics—a guidebook. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J (2013) Can participation change the geography of water? Lessons from South Africa. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103:271–279

  • Challen R (2000) Institutions, transaction costs, and environmental policy: institutional reform for water resources. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P (2000) What can we learn from a theory of complexity? Emergence 2(1):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole DH, Grossman PZ (2002) The meaning of property rights: law versus economics? Land Econ 78(3):317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conradie B, Goldin J, Standish B, Visser M (2001) Competition policy and privatisation in the South African Water Industry. University of Cape Town: DPRU Working paper No 01/45. Development Policy Research Unit

  • Corson N, Aziz-Alaoui M (2009) Understanding complex systems. Scientific Publishing Services Ltd, Chennai

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox JC, Ostrom E, Walker JM (2010) Bosses and kings: asymmetric power in paired common-pool and public good games. biennial social dilemmas conference. Rice University, Houston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dent M (2006) CMAs as integration hubs for information and knowledge. Leadership Newsletter No. 33. University of Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit, Pretoria

  • Dent M (2008) Creating commons to manage commons. Leadership newsletter no. 77. University of Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit, Pretoria

  • Department of Water Affair (DWA) (2004a) National water resource strategy (NWRS): final draft. Department of Water Affairs, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Affairs (DWA) (2004b) The national water resource strategy (including a strategy for urban water conservation and demand management). Department of Water Affairs, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Affairs (DWA) (2012) Managing water for an equitable and sustainable future. Department of Water Affairs, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Affairs (DWA) (2013) National water resource strategy: water for an equitable and sustainable future. Department of Water Affairs, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis R (2005) Water justice in South Africa: natural resources policy at the intersection of human rights, economics, and political power. Georget Int Environ Law Rev 18:149–96

  • Funke N, Nortje K, Findlater K, Burns MT, Turton A, Weaver A, Hatting HH (2007) Redressing inequality: South Africa’s new water policy. Environment 49(3):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton R, Libecap G, Mcglennon S, Landry C, O’Brien B (2011) An integrated assessment of water markets: a cross-country comparison. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5(2):219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh EH, Fox HE, Davies-Coleman HD (2010) Framework for local government to implement integrated water resource management linked to water service delivery. Water SA 36(4):475–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imperial MT (2012) Developing a framework for analyzing partnerships for integrated water resources management (IWRM): an institutional analysis of watershed partnerships in the US design and dynamics of institutions for collective action. Utrecht University, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • James K, Randall N, Haddaway N (2016) A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environ Evid 5(7):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapfudzaruwa F, Sowman MM (2009) Is there a role for traditional governance systems in South Africa’s new water management regime? Water SA 35(5):683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberherr E (2009) Policy relevance of new institutional economics? Assessing efficiency, legitimacy and effectiveness. Discussion paper series on the coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures

  • Malzbender D, Goldin J, Turton A, Earle A (2005) The international workshop African water laws: plural legislative frameworks for rural water management in Africa. South Africa, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • March J, Olsen J (1989) Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basis of politics. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew RC (1986) The economics of institutions and the sources of economic growth. Econ J 96(4):903–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick R (2007) Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15200–15205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner R, Funke N, Nienaber N, Ntombela C (2013) The status quo of research on South Africa’s water resource management institutions. Water SA 39(5):721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokgope K, Pollard S, Butterworth J (2001) Water resources and water supply for rural communities in the Sand River Catchment, South Africa. In: 27th WEDC Conference: People and systems for water, sanitation and health. Lusaka

  • Muller K (2008) Assessing cooperative environmental governance systems: the cases of the Kogelberg biosphere reserve and the Olifants-Doorn Catchment management Agency. Politeia 27(1):86–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash F (2012) Participation and passive revolution: the reproduction of neoliberal water governance mechanisms in Durban, South Africa. Antipode 45(1):101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (1981) Handbook of organizational design. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Ostrom E (1992) Crafting institutions for self governing irrigation systems. Institute of Contemporary Studies, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100(3):641–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2011) Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiaud S, Locatelli C (2010) Institutional economics. POLINARES Working Paper 2

  • RSA (Republic of South Africa) (1996) Constitution of the Republic of South Act 108 of 1996. Government Press, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • RSA (Republic of South Africa) (1997) Water Services Act (Act No. 108 of 1997). Government Press, Pretoria

  • RSA (Republic of South Africa) (1998) National Water Act. Government Printer, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleth RM, Dinar A (2004) A cross-country analysis of institutions and performance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Savenije HH (2002) Why water is not an ordinary economic good, or why the girl is special. Phys Chem Earth 27:741–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savenije HH, Van der Zaag P (2002) Water as an economic good and demand management: paradigms with pitfalls. Int Water Res Assoc 27(1):98–104

  • Shen D, Speed R (2010) Water resources allocation in the People’s Republic of China. In: Sun X, Speed R, Shen D (eds) Water resources management in the People’s Republic of China. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein R (2005) Water law in a democratic South Africa: a country case study examining the introduction of a public rights system. Tex Law Rev 83(7):2169–2196

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel A, Hagedorn K, Tomas SV (2012) Institutional economics and political economy i: basic concepts and applications. Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin. Faculty of Agricultural and Horticulture, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson H, Stimie CM, Richters E, Perret S (2001) Policies, legislation and organizations related to water in South Africa, with special reference to the Olifants river basin. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Working Paper 18 (South Africa Working Paper No. 7)

  • UNESCO (2012) Investing in water infrastructure, its operation and its maintenance. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economist: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38(3):595–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Okavango Research Institute, University of Botswana, Maun, Botswana

    Patricia Kefilwe Madigele

Authors
  1. Patricia Kefilwe Madigele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Kefilwe Madigele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madigele, P.K. South Africa’s water regulatory and policy framework: a new institutional economic review. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 4, 129–141 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0167-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0167-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation