Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Sample Size, Dry Unit Weight, and Hysteresis of Expansive Soil on SWCC and Finite Slope Stability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the influences of sample size and dry unit weight on expansive soil properties, focusing on soil water characteristic curves (SWCCs) and the stability of unsaturated finite slopes. The expansive soil collected from IIT Hyderabad, Sangareddy, Telangana, India, was compacted in both California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and relative density (RD) molds at varying water contents, ranging from 8.0% water content to saturated water content. Soil water characteristic curves (SWCCs) were systematically measured at different depths using matric potential sensors (MPS) in both CBR (2 cm, 8 cm, and 14 cm) and RD molds (2 cm, 6 cm, 10 cm, 14 cm, and 18 cm). Notably, matric suction of the soil compacted in RD molds was assessed at the maximum dry unit weight (MDU), as well as at 90%, 80%, and 70% of MDU. The results of the experiments revealed that matric suction in the CBR mold was underestimated by 14.69% when compared to the RD mold. Moreover, expansive soils compacted at MDU exhibited 68.56% greater suction than those compacted at 70% of MDU. The study highlights the depth-dependent increase in matric suction in both CBR and RD molds. Furthermore, the research elucidates the pronounced hysteresis effect in expansive soil compacted at low dry unit weight compared to MDU. Crucially, the research establishes a robust correlation between the stability of unsaturated finite slopes and the dry unit weight. The factor of safety for unsaturated finite slopes exhibited an 84.67% increase as dry unit weight increases from 12.4 kN/m3 to 17.7 kN/m3, emphasizing the significant influence of dry unit weight on location of critical failure surfaces. The present investigation provides crucial understandings into the complex interactions among soil compaction, matric suction, and slope stability. These findings offer valuable information for improving geotechnical approaches in slope design and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanapalli SK (1994) Simple test procedures and their interpretation in evaluating the shear strength of unsaturated soils. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Saskatchewan.

  3. Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Res Res 12(3):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fredlund DG, Xing A (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Can Geotech J 31(4):521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leong EC, Rahardjo H (1997) Review of soil-water characteristic curve equations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(12):1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1106)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou AN, Sheng D, Carter JP (2012) Modelling the effect of initial on soil-water characteristic curves. Géotechnique 62(8):669–680. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chittoori B, Moghal AAB, Pedarla A, Al-Mahbashi AM (2017) Effect of unit weight on porosity and consolidation characteristics of expansive clays. J Test Eval 45(1):94–104. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raghuram ASS, Mounika N, Basha BM, Moghal AAB (2023) Soil water characteristic curves of soils exhibiting different plasticity. Int J of Geosynth and Ground Eng 9(3):25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00444-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Assouline S (2006) Modeling the relationship between soil bulk and the water retention curve. Vadose Zone J 5(2):554–562. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Puppala AJ, Manosuthikij T, Chittoori BCS (2013) Swell and shrinkage characterizations of unsaturated expansive clays. Eng Geol 164:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for measurement of soil potential (suction) using filter paper. ASTM D5298. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM

  13. Raghuram ASS, Basha BM, Moghal AAB (2020) Effect of fines content on the hysteretic behavior of water-retention characteristic curves of reconstituted soils. J Mat Civil Eng 32(4):04020057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Mahbashi A, Al-Shamrani MA, Moghal AAB (2020) Soil water characteristic curve response and one-dimensional deformation characteristics of fiber reinforced lime blended expansive soil. J Mat Civil Eng 32(6):04020125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thakur VKS, Sreedeep S, Singh DN (2005) Parameters affecting soil-water characteristic curves of fine-grained soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(4):521–524. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(521)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Leong EC (2013) Effects of flux boundary conditions on porewater pressure distribution in slope. Eng Geol 165:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoyos LR, Suescún-Florez EA, Puppala AJ (2015) Stiffness of intermediate unsaturated soil from simultaneous suction-controlled resonant column and bender element testing. Eng Geol 188(7):10–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanapalli SK, Nicotera MV, Sharma RS (2008) Axis translation and negative water column techniques for suction control. Geotech Geol Eng 26(6):645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8819-3_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leong EC, Tripathy S, Rahardjo H (2003) Total suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a device using chilled mirror dew-point technique. Geotechnique 53(2):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.2.173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amer MI, Kovacs WD, Aggour MS (1987) Cyclic simple shear size effects. J Geotech Eng 113(7):693–707. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:7(693)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Starr JL, Meisinger JJ, Parkin TB (1995) Influence of sample size on chemical and physical soil measurements. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59(3):713–719. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900030012x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shibuya S, Mitachi T, Tamate S (1997) Interpretation of direct shear box testing of sands as quasi-simple shear. Geotechnique 47(4):769–790. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.4.769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cerato AB, Lutenegger AJ (2006) Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands. Geotech Test J 29(6):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dadkhah R, Ghafoori M, Ajalloeian R, Lashkaripour GR (2010) The effect of direct shear test on the strength parameters of clayey sand in Isfahan city. Iran J Applied Sci 10(18):2027–2033. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.2027.2033

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moayed ZR, Alibolandi M, Alizadeh A (2017) Specimen size effects on direct shear test of silty sands. Int J Geotech Eng 11(2):198–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1205166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Simms PH, Yanful EK (2002) Predicting soil—water characteristic curves of compacted plastic soils from measured pore-size distributions. Geotechnique 52(4):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.4.269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu PK, Matsushima K, Tatsuoka F (2008) Effects of specimen size and some other factors on the strength and deformation of granular soil in direct shear tests. Geotech Test J 31(1):45–64. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oh WT, Vanapalli SK (2013) Scale effect of plate load tests in unsaturated soils. Int J Geomate 4(8):585–594

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tao G, Chen Y, Xiao H, Chen Q, Wan J (2019) Determining soil-water characteristic curves from mercury intrusion porosimeter test data using fractal theory. Energies 12(4):752. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vanapalli SK, Fredlund DG, Pufahl DE (1999) The influence of soil structure and stress history on the soil–water characteristics of a compacted till. Geotechnique 49:143–159. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.2.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Arya LM, Leij FJ, Shouse PJ, van Genuchten MT (1999) Relationship between the hydraulic conductivity function and the paticle-size distribution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351063x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Arya LM, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT, Shouse PJ (1999) Scaling parameter to predict the soil water characteristics from particle-size distribution data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:510–519. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300030013x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Arya LM, Paris JF (1981) A physic-empirical model to predict soil moisture characteristics from particle-size distribution and bulk data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060004x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li JY, Yang Q, Li PY, Yang QL (2009) Experimental research on soil–water characteristic curve of remolded residual soils. Electron J Geotech 14:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lim SM, Yao K, Jin D, Albadri WM, Liu X (2022) Influence of matric suction on resilient modulus and CBR of compacted Ballina clay. Constr Build Mater 359:129482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Birle E, Heyer D, Vogt N (2008) Influence of the initial water content and dry unit weight on the soil–water retention curve and the shrinkage behavior of a compacted clay. Acta Geotech 3:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-008-0059-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moghal AAB, Abbas MF, Al-Mahbashi AM, Shaker AA (2016) Effect of structure anisotropy and compaction method on the swelling behavior of Al-Qatif Soil. Int J Geomate. 11(26): 2600–2605. https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/2643. Accessed 7 Oct 2023

  38. Moghal AAB, Ashfaq M, Al-Obaid AAK, Abbas MF, Al-Mahbashi AM, Shaker AA (2021) Compaction delay and its effect on the geotechnical properties of lime treated semi-arid soils. Road Mater Pavement Design 22(11):2626–2640. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2020.1784256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Croney D, Coleman JD (1954) Soil structure in relation to soil suction (pF). Eur J Soil Sci 5:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1954.tb02177.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ng CWW, Pang YW (2000) Influence of stress state on soil water characteristics and slope stability. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:2(157)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sun DA, Sheng DC, Xu YF (2007) Collapse behavior of unsaturated compacted soil with different initial. Can Geotech J 44:673–686. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gallage CPK, Uchimura T (2010) Effects of dry unit weight and grain size distribution on soil-water characteristic curves of sandy soils. Soils Found 50(1):161–172. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Box JE, Taylor SA (1962) Influence of soil bulk on matric potential. Soil Sci Soc Am J 26:119–122. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1962.03615995002600020008x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Campbell GS, Gardner WH (1971) Psychometric measurement of soil water potential: temperature and bulk effects. Soil Sci Soc Am J 35:8–12. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1971.03615995003500010011x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Krahn J, Fredlund DG (1972) On total, matric and osmotic suction. Soil Sci 114:339–348

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao Y, Cui Y, Zhou H, Feng X, Huang Z (2017) Effects of void ratio and grain size distribution on water retention properties of compacted infilled joint soils. Soils Found 57:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen X, Hu K, Chen J, Zhao W (2018) Laboratory investigation of the effect of initial dry unit weight and grain size distribution on soil–water characteristic curves of wide-grading gravelly soil. Geotech Geol Eng 36(2):885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0362-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cao B, Tian Y, Gui R, Liu Y (2021) Experimental study on the effect of key factors on the soil–water characteristic curves of fine-grained tailings. Front Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.710986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. ASTM. 2018. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318–17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM

  50. ASTM. 2021. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. ASTM D698–12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM

  51. METER Group (2019) Commercial publications, Pullman, www.metergroup.com/environment/products/

  52. Tripathy S, Al-Khyat S, Cleall PJ, Baille W, Schanz T (2016) Soil suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a sensor using fixed-matrix porous ceramic discs. Indian Geotech J 46(3):252–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0200-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Karagoly, Y, Tripathy S, Cleall PJ, Mahdi T (2018) Suction measurements by a fixed-matrix porous ceramic disc sensor. In Ng, C.W., Leung, A.K., Chiu, A.C.F., and Zhou, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Hong Kong

  54. Najdi A, Encalada D, Mendes J, Prat PC, Ledesma A (2023) Evaluating innovative direct and indirect soil suction and volumetric measurement techniques for the determination of soil water retention curves following drying and wetting paths. Eng Geol 322:107179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for minimum index and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative . ASTM D4254–16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.

  56. ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils. ASTM D 1883–12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.

  57. Chittoori B, Moghal AAB, Al-Mahbashi AM, Pedarla A (2016) Effect of on pore size and pore volume of expansive clays. geo-china 2016: in situ and laboratory test methods for site characterization, design, and quality control, GSP. pp 265: 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480083.023

  58. Chetia M, Sreedeep S (2011) An investigation on the effect of initial water content and dry unit weight on drying soil-water characteristic curve of a cohesionless soil. In Proc., of 5th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils. 1: 447–451. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10526-64

  59. Raghuram ASS, Basha BM (2022) Optimum design of unsaturated finite clayey slopes using second order reliability method. Int J Geomech 23(2):04022271. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Garven EA, Vanapalli SK (2006) Evaluation of empirical procedures for predicting the shear strength of unsaturated soils. In Proc., of 4th Int. Conf. on Unsaturated Soils, Geotechnical Special Publication 147, edited by G. A. Miller, C. E. Zapata, S. L. Houston, and D. G. Fredlund, 2570–2581. Reston, VA: ASCE.

  61. Morgenstern NR, Price VE (1965) The analysis of stability of general slip surface. Geotechnique 15:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1965.15.1.79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ayers PD (1987) Moisture and bulk effects on soil shear strength parameters for coarse grained soils. Transactions of the Asae 31(2):1282–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani, Hyderabad, 500078, India

    Ammavajjala Sesha Sai Raghuram

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kandi, Hyderabad, 502285, India

    Ammavajjala Sesha Sai Raghuram, Pawan Singh Negi & B. Munwar Basha

  3. National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal, 506004, India

    Arif Ali Baig Moghal

Authors
  1. Ammavajjala Sesha Sai Raghuram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pawan Singh Negi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Munwar Basha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arif Ali Baig Moghal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The individual contributions of each author are highlighted as follows: ASSR: conceptualization, methodology, data analysis, validation, and writing (original draft); PSN: methodology and investigation; BMB: conceptualization, project administration, resources, supervision, methodology, and writing (reviewing and editing); AABM: conceptualization and writing (reviewing and editing).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Munwar Basha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article, and the authors did not receive any external funds to support the work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 97 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raghuram, A.S.S., Negi, P.S., Basha, B.M. et al. Effect of Sample Size, Dry Unit Weight, and Hysteresis of Expansive Soil on SWCC and Finite Slope Stability. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 10, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00531-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00531-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation