Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Evaluation of Relative Soil–Geotextile Displacements Induced by Strip Footing Pressure on a Reinforced Foundation Bed over Soft Subgrade

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents insights from small-scale model tests on a statically loaded strip footing placed on dense base sand with a single geotextile layer over a loose subgrade. The evaluation of the geotextile's benefits involved comparing the load-settlement curves obtained for the improved soil model against those observed in the unreinforced beds. The influence of inclusion on relative soil–geotextile displacements is assessed using LVDTs attached to the geotextile, digital image correlation technique, and digital microscopes. The soil–geotextile interaction mechanism was experimentally analyzed by closely observing the displacements of both the geotextile and surrounding sand. Additionally, the microscopic particle motion around the geotextile was tracked to verify the macro-behavior of the sand–geotextile interface during footing pressure increment. The results improve the understanding of sand–geotextile interaction during strip surcharge on soft subgrade reinforced foundation beds, indicating negligible relative soil–geosynthetic displacements at lower footing pressures. However, as the load increases, the relative displacements along the anchorage length become more pronounced, revealing distinct behavior at the upper and lower interfaces of the reinforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

modified from [11]

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study will be made available upon request to the corresponding author. We understand the importance of data sharing in advancing scientific research and promoting transparency. To access the data, interested researchers can contact the corresponding author via email at [adis.skejic@gf.unsa.ba]. We will promptly respond to all requests and provide the necessary datasets and materials, ensuring that fellow researchers can validate and build upon our work. By offering data availability upon request, we aim to foster a collaborative research environment and contribute to the collective knowledge in our field.

References

  1. Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity analysis on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 101(12):1257–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourdeau PL, Holtz RD (1992) Anchorage and modulus in geotextile-reinforced unpaved roads by RA Douglas. Geotext Geomembr 11(1):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas RA, Kelly MA (1986) Geotextile ‘reinforced’ unpaved logging roads: the effect of anchorage. Geotext Geomembr 4(2):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Love JP, Burd HJ, Milligan GWE, Houlsby GT (1987) Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on a soft clay subgrade. Can Geotech J 24(4):611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fannin RJ, Sigurdsson O (1996) Field observations on stabilization of unpaved roads with geosynthetics. J Geotech Eng 122(7):544–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demir A, Yildiz A, Laman M, Ornek M (2014) Experimental and numerical analyses of circular footing on geogrid-reinforced granular fill underlain by soft clay. Acta Geotech 9(4):711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cicek E, Guler E, Yetimoglu T (2015) Effect of reinforcement length for different geosynthetic reinforcements on strip footing on sand soil. Soils Found 55(4):661–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saha Roy S, Deb K (2017) Effects of aspect ratio of footings on bearing capacity for geogrid-reinforced sand over soft soil. Geosynth Int 24(4):362–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saha Roy S, Deb K (2017) Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on multilayer geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill over soft soil. Int J Geomech 17(9):04017069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raja MNA, Shukla SK (2020) Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing resting on soil bed strengthened by wraparound geosynthetic reinforcement technique. Geotext Geomembr 48(6):867–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapor M, Skejić A, Medić S, Balić A (2023) DIC assessment of foundation soil response for different reinforcement between base and soft subgrade layer–physical modeling. Geotext Geomembr 51(3):390–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang CC, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):51–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M (2015) Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation. Soils Found 55(1):74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marx DH, Kumar K, Zornberg JG (2023) Quantification of geogrid lateral restraint using transparent sand and deep learning-based image segmentation. Geotext Geomembr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Markou IN (2018) A study on geotextile—sand interface behavior based on direct shear and triaxial compression tests. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 4:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lashkari A, Jamali V (2021) Global and local sand–geosynthetic interface behaviour. Géotechnique 71(4):346–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmeira EM (2009) Soil–geosynthetic interaction: modelling and analysis. Geotext Geomembr 27(5):368–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang CC, Hsieh HY, Hsieh YL (2014) Hyperbolic models for a 2-D backfill and reinforcement pull-out. Geosynth Int 21(3):168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatami K, Esmaili D (2015) Unsaturated soil–woven geotextile interface strength properties from small-scale pull-out and interface tests. Geosynth Int 22(2):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou J, Chen JF, Xue JF, Wang JQ (2012) Micro-mechanism of the interaction between sand and geogrid transverse ribs. Geosynth Int 19(6):426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dyer M (1985) Observation of the stress distribution in crushed glass with applications to soil reinforcement (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford).

  22. Sugimoto M, Alagiyawanna AMN, Kadoguchi K (2001) Influence of rigid and flexible face on geogrid pull-out tests. Geotext Geomembr 19(5):257–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ouria A, Mahmoudi A, Sadeghpour H (2020) Effect of the geotextile arrangement on the bearing capacity of a strip footing. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 6:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Michalowski RL, Shi L (2003) Deformation patterns of reinforced foundation sand at failure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(5):439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen J, Guo X, Sun R, Rajesh S, Jiang S, Xue J (2021) Physical and numerical modelling of strip footing on geogrid reinforced transparent sand. Geotext Geomembr 49(2):399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Derksen J, Fuentes R, Ziegler M (2022) Geogrid-soil interaction: experimental analysis of factors influencing load transfer. Geosynth Int 30(3):315–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourdeau PL, Chapuis J, Holtz RD (1988) Effect of anchorage and modulus in geotextile-reinforced unpaved roads. Geotext Geomembr 7(3):221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) Effect of submergence on settlement and bearing capacity of surface strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jha JN, Shukla SK (2015) Bearing capacity and settlement characteristics of sand subgrades with vertical reinforcement supporting a square footing. Inte J Geosynth Ground Eng 1:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  30. Saha Roy S, Deb K (2020) Effect of aspect ratio of footing on behavior of two closely-spaced footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 48(4):443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khalvati Fahliani H, Arvin MR, Hataf N, Khademhosseini A (2021) Experimental model studies on strip footings resting on geocell-reinforced sand slopes. Inte J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(2):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Latha GM, Somwanshi A (2009) Effect of reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square footings on sand. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gedela R, Karpurapu R (2021) Laboratory and numerical studies on the performance of geocell reinforced base layer overlying soft subgrade. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Skejic A, Medic S, Dolarevic S (2018) Influence of wire mesh characteristics on reinforced soil model wall failure mechanisms-physical and numerical modelling. Geotext Geomembr 46(6):726–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khatami H, Deng A, Jaksa M (2019) An experimental study of the active arching effect in soil using the digital image correlation technique. Comput Geotech 108:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gedela R, Kalla S, Sudarsanan N, Karpurapu R (2021) Assessment of load distribution mechanism in geocell reinforced foundation beds using digital imaging correlation techniques. Transp Geotech 31:100664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacobs F, Ruiken A, Ziegler M (2016) Investigation of kinematic behavior and earth pressure development of geogrid reinforced soil walls. Transp Geotech 8:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ezzein FM, Bathurst RJ (2014) A new approach to evaluate soil-geosynthetic interaction using a novel pull-out test apparatus and transparent granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 42(3):246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Peng X, Zornberg JG (2017) Evaluation of load transfer in geogrids for base stabilization using transparent soil. Procedia Eng 189:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aramis 2D® software. GOM-Gesellschaft fur Optische Messtechnik mbH, Optical Measuring Techniques. http://www.gom.com/EN/index.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2018

  41. Das BM, Shin EC, Omar MT (1994) The bearing capacity of surface strip foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand and clay-a comparative study. Geotech Geol Eng 12(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yetimoglu T, Wu JT, Saglamer A (1994) Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2083–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Adams MT, Collin JG (1997) Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(1):66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, AS and SM; methodology, AS, and SM; formal analysis, AB and MK; resources, AS, SM, MK, AB; writing—original draft preparation, AS, and SM; writing—review and editing, AS, SM, MK; visualization, AS, SM, MK, supervision, AB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adis Skejić.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kapor, M., Skejić, A., Medić, S. et al. Experimental Evaluation of Relative Soil–Geotextile Displacements Induced by Strip Footing Pressure on a Reinforced Foundation Bed over Soft Subgrade. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 9, 82 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00503-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00503-5

Keywords

Navigation